Does Sarah Palin have a shot at U.S. presidency?

Xinhua ^ | December 21, 2010 | Matthew Rusling

[al baby]

I was sleep posting

[al baby]

I was sleep posting, Im going to have it removed

[t-dude]

This makes me smile.

Some people have no idea what is in store...

They certainly can mimic the establishment talking points...

Sarah Palin will win the nomination in a cakewalk and the White House in a landslide.

Just watch.

[JPG]

How’d you like your steak? Did you kill the steer yourself or did you have someone else do the killing for you? Clubbed any fish lately or did you let the fisherman handle that? By the way, your breakfast bacon didn't magically appear from the sky, a pig had to die. /s

[freedumb2003]

>>The Republican party will be better when we get rid of people like you from the party. You are not a conservative and you clearly don’t have the best intrests of your country in mind.<<

All because I see the truth about Mrs. Palin and the damage she will do.

*shakes head*

What has become of Conservatives where any dissent is seen as “not Conservative?”

You Palin-bots are the most narrow-minded I have seen since the Paul-bots.

[FreeReign]

She can not get to 270...

You must think that the people don't hate Obama.

Obama can not win again in Indiana, N. Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, and Florida and N. Hamphire.

[t-dude]

Hey freeDumb,

I want to thank you.

I don’t really know what your motives or intentions are by coming on here with your anti-Palin nonsense, but it has provided a valuable service here and I appreciate it.

I guess you may be unfamiliar with or just don’t understand the phenomenon of Sarah, but she connects with her supporters on such an elementary gut level, we feel she is actually one of us and represents our core values.

We tend to see all the unfair and false criticisms of her as attacks on us and what we personally believe in and hold dear. As such, when someone like you comes along spouting the usual mainstream narrative (that we know for a fact to be false) it strengthens our resolve, causing us to get even more invested in her victory.

You may single handily inspire enough of us to put her over the top early.

So, please, keep up the good work.

You have given no evidence to support your “position” that Sarah can’t win. You only repeat the establishment lie based on bogus polls. They are trying to sway public opinion with these, and it must be frustrating for you establishment types that it doesn’t seem to be working.

I have to ask, is Romney paying you? Because if not you are a fool. He is paying good money for agitators like you in an attempt to tamp down support for Sarah.

It’s just ironic how it has the opposite effect.

So thank you...now go get some of that easy Romney money. Fool.

[SoConPubbie]

You continue to confuse your liking of her (and I think she is great) with her appeal to the American public.

No, I am representing the truth that the base is solidly behind Sarah Palin and that is what is important for the Primaries, something that you in your vaunted CALCULUS, have dismissed.

Furthermore, you are relying on fallible polls, as shown by the history of Ronald Reagan, to push the falsehood that she cannot win.

Your calculus is nothing more than an irrational dislike/hatred of Sarah Palin.

Your calculus is nothing more than your unsubstantiated opinion.

[SoConPubbie]

All because I see the truth about Mrs. Palin and the damage she will do.

You're blinded by your dislike of Palin, how could you see anything in any type of proper perspective?

[jessduntno]

“I know YOU were giving an insult. I assumed that was because you believed the comparison between Palin and Quayle to be insulting to Palin.”

You misunderstood. I would not be insulted to be compared to Mr. Quayle myself. I don’t know why anyone would..

[jessduntno]

*shakes head*

I thought I heard a loud rattle.

[freedumb2003]

>>You’re blinded by your dislike of Palin, how could you see anything in any type of proper perspective?<<

One more time. I adore Mrs. Palin. I just think she can’t be elected and will do more harm than good as a candidate. I am looking out for the best interests of Conservatives in the long run.

This should be a difference of opinion on viability.

This thread is all but a carbon copy of the many Paul threads during the invasion of the Paul-bots. They pretty much said the same thing: anyone who didn’t support their candidate was a liberal dummy, (etc. etc. etc.)

Sound familiar?

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

“No shot, no way. A big fat NO. She lost me and a whole bunch of others(more that those hunters out there can imagine) with her slaughter of a clueless animal who didn’t know he was part of a bigger picture so it just stood there, minding his own business, waiting to be killed over and over until finally it died because over-exposed new-millionaire, president wannabee Palin could fill her freezer to feed her family.”

I agree with you. IT WAS AWFUL, HEARTLESS, and SAVAGE. The Moslems look civilized compared to what this uncivilized female did to some poor defenseless animal. It was and always will be unforgivable.

It makes me sick and rips my heart to think about it!!!!

I dislike this person very much.

[Windflier]

FD, you may be missing the big picture by standing too close to this thing, and trying to analyze it at the microscopic level.

Step back. Way back. You’ll begin to see the outlines of some large narratives begin to take shape. One of them is the fact that the Democrats/moonbats/progressives won’t have a charismatic “messiah” to rally behind in 2012.

Obama is damaged goods - a broken piece. He’s given the right volumes of ammo to use against him in the upcoming primary. His approval rating among his base is in the mid to low 40s. He has failed to deliver the Commie Utopia his base believed he would. The simple mechanics of incumbency will bring Democrats to the polls for him, but in nothing like the numbers we saw in 2008. Frankly, the thrill is gone.

On the other hand, enthusiasm and momentum is building on the right, propelling elections and the national agenda toward a conservative counter-revolution. November 2nd was our D-Day landing, and we’ve now established a solid beach head from which to project a major offensive against the heart of Leftistberg.

Now, take a look at the major victory we just won and notice the key Generals who mapped out and led the assault on the entrenched Democrat fortifications. You know who they are.

Make no mistake. We are now engaged in a battle for our survival that is every bit as dangerous as the one the Greatest Generation waged. The citizen army that has mobilized to defeat tyranny over the last two years will invest our “Generals” with elected positions of great power in 2012, including the presidency.

There is one of our “Generals” who stands head and shoulders above the rest, and that is Sarah Palin. Like it or not, she is the de facto leader of our movement. In 2012, that leadership will be acknowledged by the people when they officially declare her Commander In Chief.

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

“You’re blinded by your dislike of Palin, how could you see anything in any type of proper perspective?”

Let’s turn that around:

You’re blinded by your love of Palin, how could you see anything in any type of proper perspective?

[McGruff]

Does Sarah Palin have a shot at U.S. presidency?

I'd bet she's gotta a better shot that anyone else.

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

Please see my riposte in your favor at #175.

Keep up you good work.

These nuts are worse than Bushbots. This is one of several reasons we are in so much political trouble. They don’t think. These Sarahbots can’t see the forest for the trees.

[PghBaldy]

President Dewey is the one to emulate.

[tallyhoe]

Reagan doesn’t have a chance. Carter leads him in the polls by 22 points.

I remember that! Carter won didn’t he? LOL

[beezdotcom]

You misunderstood. I would not be insulted to be compared to Mr. Quayle myself. I don’t know why anyone would..

*click* Okay, I think I get you, now...sorry for the misunderstanding.