Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Sarah Palin a political savant or ‘chicken’s guts’?
The Toronto Star ^ | August 27, 2010 | Various Pundits

Posted on 08/27/2010 12:06:33 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

JOHN DICKERSON, Slate: “Sarah Palin has special medicine. That’s about the only clear conclusion to be drawn from Tuesday’s primary results. She backed five candidates in Arizona, Florida and Alaska and they all won. The rest of the results from the evening defied easy matching. . . Palin now has more support for a favorite story line of hers: The pundits and so-called experts said things were going to go one way but she had faith; she knew the real deal. This is part of her larger pitch: that she understands something fundamental about conservative voters. That, in turn, is what voters believe about her, which makes them think she has a special light to guide the country out of the muck.”

JENNIFER RUBIN, Commentary: “Being a political soothsayer and a superb judge of talent doesn’t ensure a successful candidacy or an effective presidency. But it’s not nothing. And having experienced an over-credentialed, pseudo-intellectual president who lacks a basic understanding of the American people, the public may find something refreshing about someone who ‘gets’ what the country is about. Palin knows what to look for in candidates because she is in sync with the centre-right zeitgeist.”

KEN BLANCHARD, SouthDakotaPolitics.Blogspot.com: “When Sarah Palin resigned as governor almost everyone (yours truly included) thought it was a dumb, even inexplicable move. Well, guess who looks smart and who looks dumb now. . . . Had she remained a governor with hopes of a presidential run in 2012, she would have had to start all over again. She would also have left behind a Dan Quayle-like reputation. Palin guessed that this was her year to be a national force, and she guessed right.”

CHRIS WEIGANT, Huffington Post: “Whether her clout wins some races or loses some races, the big honking important thing (to her, at any rate) is that everybody in the media is raptly paying attention. Major news sites not only have their traditional red/blue maps of the individual races to see the state of the polling, most of them have also now added a ‘Sarah Palin pick record’ map as well. If you think about that for a minute, it really is kind of stunning. Nobody else in politics, that I can remember, has ever gotten the media to examine their ‘picks’ with such microscopic detail — Democrat or Republican.”

ABC NEWS: “She’s had her winning streaks and she’s had her slumps. Earlier this year, Sarah Palin seemed like a Republican king- and queen-maker, helping candidates score a string of victories in hard-fought Republican primaries in South Carolina, Kentucky, California, New Mexico, Iowa, Texas and elsewhere. Since July 20 and up until last night, six Palin-supported candidates had been on the ballot and all had lost.”

MARK MARDELL, BBC: “It’s true John McCain won after she backed him against a Tea Party supporter. It’s true that in her home state of Alaska, it seems her support has helped propel a little-known Tea Party activist to victory over the sitting senator. And it’s true the other three candidates she endorsed have won. But beware. It is wise to be a little wary when looking for patterns . . . and trends in elections. Sometimes there are trends of great importance. Sometimes they have as little predictive power as a pattern in a flight of birds or a chicken’s guts.”

STEVE M., NoMoreMister.Blogspot.com: “She’s savvy enough, or her advisers are savvy enough, to play up her skills at turning out Republican votes at this time. But I suspect she thinks she’s hotter stuff than that. And the upcoming GOP wave election may feed her delusion — this go-round, the broader electorate will vote for a lot of her candidates, and she may credit herself. And that will motivate her toward a presidential run.”

ELEANOR CLIFT, PoliticsDaily.com: “Palin’s win-loss ratio is unlikely to improve in November since most of the candidates she favors tend to be so far to the right that if they get through the primary, they’re outflanked in the general election. . . There’s a difference between having a sliver of the electorate love you madly and reaching out to 50 per cent plus to win a national mandate.”


TOPICS: Campaign News; Polls; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2012; dinosaurmedia; jourbalists; lamestreammedia; mamagrizzlyroared; msm; palin; palinendorsements; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

And yes, I realize in the Huffpo quote I just reposted that Miss Chris tried to be snarky by saying this fact is important “to her” (meaning Palin) as if it’s not important in its own right. Which it is. Which is why s/he (Chrissy) mentioned it in the first place.

A classic case of a leftist unable to restrain him/herself from pointing out an obviously important fact while at the same time trying to deride the importance of that fact.


21 posted on 08/27/2010 4:22:55 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Dear Pundits:

You are all Idiot Savante’s

S/B -

Dear Pundits:

You are all idiot savants

22 posted on 08/27/2010 5:16:47 AM PDT by jla (Have you used Rosetta Stone language method? Please Freepmail me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: onyx

There once was a gal from Wasilla
The media thought dumb as a gorilla.
She pulled a right Cross
Out of every “big loss”
On her way to the big White Villa.


23 posted on 08/27/2010 6:07:03 AM PDT by Melian ("There is only one tragedy in the end, not to have been a saint." ~L. Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Melian

That’s wonderful!!!
I wish I’d saved that Sarah pic of her blowing a kiss!


24 posted on 08/27/2010 6:15:46 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445; hoosiermama; Melian

Come read this, by Melian!


25 posted on 08/27/2010 6:17:05 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Maybe we should have a “Limericks for Liberals” thread. It would be fun to skewer them and it would keep us cheerful during this battle.


26 posted on 08/27/2010 6:25:12 AM PDT by Melian ("There is only one tragedy in the end, not to have been a saint." ~L. Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yep, but she’s always mean and hateful whenever she talks about conservatives, and Sarah in particular. Jealous.

Yep, and her privates are all dried up.

No love there.

27 posted on 08/27/2010 6:28:14 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Melian; MinuteGal
Leni, you'll love this one. Right up your alley!

There once was a gal from Wasilla
The media thought dumb as a gorilla.
She pulled a right Cross
Out of every “big loss”
On her way to the big White Villa.

Melian

28 posted on 08/27/2010 6:29:22 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Melian

What a great idea!

You’re talented and it would be a lot of fun!!


29 posted on 08/27/2010 6:33:38 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
“And having experienced an over-credentialed.....president.”

Jennifer Rubin wasn't saying that to be kind to Obama. I think the implication is long on "credentials" and short on talent and experience.

Or as they say in Texas, "all hat and no cattle".

30 posted on 08/27/2010 6:33:49 AM PDT by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

ROFLOLOL.
You know you’re right! LOL.


31 posted on 08/27/2010 6:34:34 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Melian

I love it! Sarah would too!


32 posted on 08/27/2010 6:35:44 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jla

Didn’t like my spelling? LOL


33 posted on 08/27/2010 6:38:40 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I was trying to work “vanilla” into it too, but gave up! LOL!

Thanks for enjoying it.


34 posted on 08/27/2010 6:50:54 AM PDT by Melian ("There is only one tragedy in the end, not to have been a saint." ~L. Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Will we ever get rid of Miss Clift?
She babbles away like she's squiffed
Her predictions are nuts
She must read chicken guts
In between each and every face-lift

Leni

35 posted on 08/27/2010 7:08:28 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: onyx

She has this uncanny knack for making libs scream. lol. “Her win/loss ratio is unlikely to improve.” Eh..Eleanor, so long as her’s is better than 0’s...I’m giddy with joy there ol’ gal.


36 posted on 08/27/2010 7:42:49 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("Sorry I'm late. I had to stop by the wax museum to give the finger to FDR!" C.Hill (Palin '12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

Arianna might fire this guy...lol.

CHRIS WEIGANT, Huffington Post: “Whether her clout wins some races or loses some races, the big honking important thing (to her, at any rate) is that everybody in the media is raptly paying attention. Major news sites not only have their traditional red/blue maps of the individual races to see the state of the polling, most of them have also now added a ‘Sarah Palin pick record’ map as well. If you think about that for a minute, it really is kind of stunning. Nobody else in politics, that I can remember, has ever gotten the media to examine their ‘picks’ with such microscopic detail — Democrat or Republican.”


37 posted on 08/27/2010 7:46:41 AM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

It’s because Sarah Palin has bigger Jueves (balls) then 95% of the GOP and 110% of the demonrats and she calls it like she sees it!!


38 posted on 08/27/2010 12:14:26 PM PDT by PissdOffPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: onyx
May I steal that?

Yes you may! Love your photos too. She just keeps looking better and better. . Hope she announces soon. . They'll be a Flood of Support!! People will go wild. . Daily Money Bombs and she'll have more $ than anyone!

39 posted on 08/27/2010 6:49:41 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson