(When Will Obama Produce A Birth Certificate?) Supreme Court Accountablity"

The Washington Times ^ | January 17, 2009 | Lonnie Leczo

[real_patriotic_american]

I stand amazed at what I am witnessing in our constitutional republic. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Constitution the rule of law in this nation? Don't Supreme Court judges take oaths promising to protect and uphold that Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies? If our laws are derived from this text, then what is it called when those laws are ignored? It is called, "breaking the law." Our Constitution lays down the eligibility requirements for presidents. One requirement states that the president of the United States must be a natural-born citizen. Now, any reasonable thinking person knows citizenship is proven by one's birth certificate. President-elect Barack Obama's presentation of a Certification of Live Birth certified that he was born alive but not that he was born in Hawaii. So we have rumors of a Kenyan birth. How do you get to the bottom of rumors? You inquire and investigate. Our Supreme Court judges are required to uphold our law and get to the bottom of this unnecessary upheaval that Mr. Obama has hurled America into. What's so hard about producing a real birth certificate? He is challenging our rule of law by refusing to prove his natural-born citizenship and is, therefore, undermining the foundation of our nation. If our Supreme Court justices continue to deny "hearing" the many lawsuits that they are being presented with concerning Mr. Obama's citizenship, then they are failing to do their jobs. The law states eligibility through natural-born citizenship is required. It is the court's duty to get to the bottom of this and hold Mr. Obama accountable to the law. LONNIE LECZO Louisville, Ky.

[cleveland gop]

We all reject his agenda and what he stands for.

And as far as the other thing....... values before party.

I am conservative first, Republican second. There is no wiggle room in that.

[freebird5850]

teach me, I want to be educated in your thinking...pm me

[Non-Sequitur]

None of them were foreign born affirmative action presidents.

If you could show he was foreign born then we wouldn't be in this situation.

[plain talk]

Obama has produced a birth certificate. We all know it is the standard reproduction you get when you request a BC and not the real deal but he has produced one. That’s more than previous presidents produced. I know. I know. previous Presidents were known entities and didn’t need to produce a BC.

So I have a different take. My complaint is not with Obama. My complaint lies with the rest of the politicians in DC who are saying nothing about checking this out in greater detail. I have to produce a DL to vote yet Obama can become President with half a BC. Incredible.

[JustaDumbBlonde]

It appears to have been a letter to the editor and I’m not so certain that it made it to ‘print’, maybe just posted on the website. I don’t know for sure with the WT, but my newspaper puts things on the website that are not in the paper.

[LucyT]

If you could show he was foreign born then we wouldn't be in this situation.

If you could show he was born in the United States then we wouldn't be in this situation.

[TigersEye]

At least the Washington Times printed his letter. Getting closer to MSM coverage.

[Jet Jaguar]

Thanks

In case it get pulled.

Home > Voices > Letters
LETTER TO EDITOR: Supreme Court accountablity

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Comment
Print
Font Size
Share
Got a Question?
You Report
Buzz up!
I stand amazed at what I am witnessing in our constitutional republic. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the Constitution the rule of law in this nation? Don’t Supreme Court judges take oaths promising to protect and uphold that Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies? If our laws are derived from this text, then what is it called when those laws are ignored? It is called, “breaking the law.”

Our Constitution lays down the eligibility requirements for presidents. One requirement states that the president of the United States must be a natural-born citizen. Now, any reasonable thinking person knows citizenship is proven by one’s birth certificate.

President-elect Barack Obama’s presentation of a Certification of Live Birth certified that he was born alive but not that he was born in Hawaii. So we have rumors of a Kenyan birth. How do you get to the bottom of rumors? You inquire and investigate.

Our Supreme Court judges are required to uphold our law and get to the bottom of this unnecessary upheaval that Mr. Obama has hurled America into. What’s so hard about producing a real birth certificate? He is challenging our rule of law by refusing to prove his natural-born citizenship and is, therefore, undermining the foundation of our nation.

If our Supreme Court justices continue to deny “hearing” the many lawsuits that they are being presented with concerning Mr. Obama’s citizenship, then they are failing to do their jobs. The law states eligibility through natural-born citizenship is required. It is the court’s duty to get to the bottom of this and hold Mr. Obama accountable to the law.

LONNIE LECZO

Louisville, Ky.

Add as Favorite
TIMES NETWORK
Twitter | MySpace | Facebook
Get Answers From the Community

[Fred Nerks]

Check the documents linked to this texadarlin comment:

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/td-blogs-2009-forecast/#comments

jbjd

I am in the middle of perfecting a Complaint and, I need some help.

Someone sent to me a link to a posting of a letter from an official in HI in response to his inquiry, explaining how that state had determined BO was eligible to get his name on the state general election ballot. He posted the letter, explaining they took the word of the DNC. He also posted the 2 attachments to the letter: a copy of the “Official Certification of Nomination” signed by the RNC for John McCain; and the the DNC Certification, signed by Nancy Pelosi. But I noticed immediately, something was very wrong with the Certification provided by the DNC.

This HI version of the Certification letter is different from the version of the Certification letter received by SC.

Here is the material portion of that document from HI.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9344926/Hawaii-Dems-and-Repubs-Say-Constitutionally-Eligible

Here is the same portion from the Certification received by SC.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democratic Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:

http://countusout.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/foia-request-response-from-va-document-from-va-sos-signed-by-nancy-pelosi-stating-that-pelosi-certified-obamas-qualifications/dnc-certification_of_nomination-082908-2/

See the difference? Also, the SC version was date stamped received by SC, whereas this HI version contains no stamp of receipt. However, the RNC Certification also attached to that letter from HI, does contain a receipt stamp.

In addition, the signatures of Nancy Pelosi are different. Did she sign 51 Certifications, one for each state and the D.C.?

So as not to hijack this thread, if you have any information, please email my blog. ALL COMMENTS ARE IN MODERATION.

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/

http://countusout.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/dnc-certification_of_nomination-082908-2.jpg

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9344926/Hawaii-Dems-and-Repubs-Say-Constitutionally-Eligible

[LucyT]

Thanks, Fred Nerks.

Pinging for help.

[Fred Nerks]

SOURCE Issue: Given that Article II of the U.S. Constitution says the President must be a natural born citizen, could Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives and Chair of the 2008 Democratic National Convention have certified that Barack Obama was “duly nominated” as the Democratic Party’s candidate for POTUS; and could the Party chairs of the Democratic Party in all 50 states and the District of Columbia then have submitted his name to state officials, along with Ms. Pelosi’s certification, to be placed onto the general election ballots; and could state officials have placed his name on the ballot and then certified the final number of votes cast for him; and can he receive the requisite votes for POTUS from the Electoral College (”EC”) when it meets on December 15 and then on January 20, be sworn into office, all without being a natural born citizen? Answer: Yes, absolutely; if the EC fails to stop him.

While the U.S. Constitution spells out in Article II that the President must be a natural born citizen – “natural born” and “citizen” are distinct qualifications – neither federal nor state law requires that any government actor must determine whether the candidate for POTUS satisfies these conditions. True, Ms. Pelosi’s signed a Certification of Nomination after the Democratic National Convention; but in this document, she only promised he is the Party’s nominee and not that he is Constitutionally eligible for the job.

[BIGLOOK]

Background .....ping

What are the odds that the security groups haven't a file on Obama?

No compromise, no quarter.

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

“Movin’ On Up,,,!” (singin’~n~scootin’butt on ground)*<;0)

[jarofants]

I wonder if him and Anna Nicholes decoreter ever dated?

[BonRad]

Page not found, still.

[LucyT]

Oh.

You saw that video, huh?

[hoosiermama]

and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:

THAT is a significant difference!

[hoosiermama]

Check this difference out and post 69.

What have we gotten into?

[1COUNTER-MORTER-68]

LMAOROF!!!...;0)...Yup!!!

[hoosiermama]

Wonder how many of the other state have discrepancies? If their are consistent with how they voted or SoS party affiliation? Hope they have already turned this over to ALL the lawyers in the cases and the FBI.