Posted on 12/31/2002 11:42:38 AM PST by JohnFiorentino
After several years of looking into the TWA Flight 800 disaster, several things seem certain to this author/investigator. The material in this article comes from a year-end statement posted by myself on another forum.
1. I regard the CWT scenario (as proposed by NTSB) to be insufficient to support their theory as outlined. I will not debate whether or not the CWT "exploded." I believe there is overwhelming evidence that it did. NTSB's inability to pinpoint an ignition source is a major failure, which undermines the investigation's conclusions.
2. Many aspects of the investigation warrant a thorough review, including but not limited to: Analysis of metallurgical limitations in the detection of bomb or missile damage on aircraft wreckage after prolonged immersion in saltwater -- Conclusions relating to the source of PETN and RDX found on the aircraft -- Data used to produce both the CIA and NTSB video depictions of Fl800's demise -- Data used to interpret the FDR -- Review of the CVR (spectral analysis) -- Review of the radar tapes, with special emphasis relating to the "ghosting" purported to have been caused by "Jet Express 18" -- Data used to determine the identity of the object depicted in the Kabot photo -- Thorough examination of the articles analyzed, and data relating to the "red residue" -- Review of debris field database -- Analysis of engine damage -- Complete details relating to the examination of CW504.-- Investigation into the NTSB's failure to identify a private aircraft which transmitted messages to Gabreski ATC on the evening of 7/17/96. The pilot indicated he saw a "boat leaving it (the TWA800 crash scene) in a Westerly direction." The pilot transmitted his tail number to the ATC.
(Note -- Subsequent investigation by this author has identified this aircraft. The information was turned over to the FBI on 12/18/02)
The importance of interviewing the pilot of this aircraft cannot be understated. He just may be the only adult individual to witness what has been coined the "30-knot track" (as seen on radar) indicative of a surface vessel leaving the scene of the tragedy. This was the only surface vessel the FBI failed to identify.
3. Recently uncovered evidence gleaned from a once secret FBI report (BNLabs Report) offers indications of events totally unrelated to a spontaneous overpressure in the CWT caused by mechanical failure. This evidence warrants further investigation.
4. Finally, the investigation should be re-opened. The review should have the proper independent oversight.
Someone has finally talked! Reed Irvine on Navy witness who saw Flight 800 downed by missile
TWA Flight 800 - New Evidence of Missile Attack
TWA Flight 800 - New Evidence of Missile Attack - Thread #2
TWA Flight 800 - New Evidence of Missile Attack - Thread #3
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Related stories:
LOL! The FBI pumped out their corrupt chests and stated there was no missile, but they were looking for a missile. If there was no missile, why were they looking for a missile, when in their mind, there was no missile?
From Here
"The captains of those four trawlers were given written descriptions of several high-interest items the FBI was looking for, without telling them what those items were. The FBI accidentally left behind the documents detailing what they were looking for when they completed the search. Those documents were obtained by the Associated Retired Aviation Professionals in the course of its investigation and have been made available to WorldNetDaily (see related documents, below)."
FBI Document - Page 1
FBI Document - Page 2
FBI Document - Page 3
FBI Document - Page 4
FBI Document - Page 5
FBI Document - Page 5
Is there Proof of a Missile?
How Government Stopped Probers
Was there a Government Cover-Up?
Oh oh. What's this?
"Stinger"
"Eject"
"Motor"
"---Metallic"
"---Cotter Key"
"Please Page If Found"
"SA Bongardt (917)895-488?"
TWA 800 Investigator William Donaldson Dies
The FBI is your friend, the FBI is your friend, the FBI is your friend, the FBI is your friend........
Yes, it is on the Downside Legacy under these titles:
TRAGEDIES (remembering the people who were lost)
RON BROWN (suspicious circumstances concerning the death of Samir Ferrat)
TWA800 HERE AND NOW (excerpts)
TWA800 HYPOTHESIS (a Freeper investigation and research)
The readers can review everything Reed Irvine said on that subject, from start to finish, by clicking here, the only place on the internet that has it all in one webpage. His closing comments about his own bellyflop and the alleged sailor whistleblower were as follows:
"He lied to me, and I regret having been deceived by him. But his lie is nothing compared to our governments lies about TWA 800. The establishment media spread those lies. They refuse to do what I have donecheck the evidence and admit that they have been deceived."
What Reed Irvine obviously should have done is "check the evidence" before he published the first article.
As the webpage that has you in such a tizzy clearly states, the original was posted here in FreeRepublic on 21 November 1999 by Lazamataz who added the following:
[quote] This post was in a salute to the various Lunaticus Kookamungii that populate this forum. [end quote]
And again we find you quoting people out of context. Why didn't you post Lazamataz's entire IN CONTEXT comment?
This post was in a salute to the various Lunaticus Kookamungii that populate this forum.
I may have been considered a for being convinced that the Government was at fault at Waco, or that Flight 800 was downed by an errant or terrorist missile, but some of the Neo-Whack-Jobs available for perusal here on Free Republic defy description. This recycled post was a HEE-HAW SAAA-LUDE to them. ;^)
3 Posted on 11/21/1999 11:57:58 PST by Lazamataz
Elmer, it is obvious you did not post the entire comment because your purpose is to besmirch those who are trying to get to the truth on TWA-800 and quoting Lazmataz in context would not have suited your purpose which is to use argument ad hominum and attempting to ridicule your opponents or their sources, thus disrupting the discussion.
The inclusion of that link AND Keyword to this thread is not conducive to civilized discourse. You included them for the sole intention of being insulting and causing friction among those interested in this topic and hijacking the thread to your purposes. You mean it to be irritating and your are. You do it to instill anger in your opponents. You are certainly consistent and, quite frankly, it is boring.
Were missile parts hidden away? New evidence of cover-up found by investigator
Thanks again. The main thing to remember is, we can trust the FBI to do the right thing, will protect us, and, of course, they're honest.
"The FBI spent $3 million of your tax money to blow up the World Trade Center." - Joseph Farah
Have a great New Year.
Americans are watching football as Rome burns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.