Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Bill
Uncle Bill,
Your post is very good. However, the second link is about a report on a "navy witness" who claimed to be a crewmember on a submarine involved in the accidental shootdown. This has been totally discredited and Reed Irvine has published a complete retraction.
42 posted on 01/01/2003 2:49:13 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker; Uncle Bill
"the second link is about a report on a "navy witness" who claimed to be a crewmember on a submarine involved in the accidental shootdown. This has been totally discredited and Reed Irvine has published a complete retraction."

The readers can review everything Reed Irvine said on that subject, from start to finish, by clicking here, the only place on the internet that has it all in one webpage. His closing comments about his own bellyflop and the alleged sailor whistleblower were as follows:

"He lied to me, and I regret having been deceived by him. But his lie is nothing compared to our government’s lies about TWA 800. The establishment media spread those lies. They refuse to do what I have done—check the evidence and admit that they have been deceived."

What Reed Irvine obviously should have done is "check the evidence" before he published the first article.

55 posted on 01/01/2003 10:01:51 AM PST by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson