Posted on 09/27/2026 4:12:05 PM PDT by ransomnote
Christian
@InTheTrenchesUK
·
7hTHIS MORNING. RAF FAIRFORD. 00:45.
A pensioner called 999. Not MI5. Not GCHQ. A villager spotted three suspicious vans heading toward a US bomber base and dialled 999.
Five men arrested under the Explosives Act, then upgraded to Section 5 of the Terrorism Act: preparation of a terrorist act. Three vans. 85 homes evacuated at 1.30am. Army bomb disposal robot inside a 400-metre cordon. Counter Terrorism Policing now leading. Major incident declared.
The operation was not intelligence-led. A resident made a phone call. That is what stopped it.
The IRGC already told you this was coming.
In July 2026, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a formal statement naming RAF Fairford specifically as "a legitimate target." They cited the US B-1B bombers striking Iran from British soil, authorised first by Keir Starmer in March 2026 and continued by Prime Minister Andy Burnham. They published the threat. They named the base. Seven months later five men turned up at it after midnight. The intelligence services had no warning. A villager did.
Now the part they really do not want you to know.
Last November the National Crime Agency arrested a man in central London on a German warrant. His name is Mohammed Naim. Son of Basem Naim, Hamas politburo member, former Gaza health minister, US-sanctioned terrorist. Mohammed served as personal bodyguard to Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh from 2006. He was photographed doing it. AFP published the images. In 2010 Egyptian police arrested him for smuggling weapons and gold through tunnels into Gaza. That arrest was documented. On record. Available to any Home Office caseworker.
In 2015 he walked into a British Home Office and claimed asylum. They gave it to him.
Theresa May's Home Office granted him indefinite leave to remain. He later received full British citizenship. Changed his name. More than once. Settled in suburban England as an IT consultant. Raised a family. The state never looked twice.
In summer 2025 he travelled to Berlin. Collected five handguns and ammunition from a Hamas contact. Drove to Vienna. Stored the weapons in a storage unit. Recorded a propaganda video announcing the plot. Target: Jewish community centres, Israeli diplomats, pro-Israel events across Germany and Austria. Timed for the second anniversary of October 7.
Mossad and German intelligence foiled it. British intelligence did not find it.
A court granted him anonymity for 100 years. He sits in a British cell while Germany waits for extradition. The state that gave him the passport is now hiding his identity. Indefinitely.
Now look at what your Prime Minister found time for this morning.
While five men were arrested at gunpoint outside an airbase the IRGC had publicly threatened, while 85 families were evacuated in the middle of the night, while bomb disposal robots crawled through vans a mile from sleeping US bomber crews, Andy Burnham was on the BBC.
He was asked about Daniel Thomas. A father of four. A former soldier. A working man. And Burnham said it is "hard to conclude" he is "anything other than someone who has racist views."
Instant. Confident. No hesitation. No "inappropriate to comment."
Asked about five terrorism arrests at a US bomber base: "It would be inappropriate to comment further whilst investigations are ongoing."
Asked about 85 families evacuated at midnight with zero intelligence warning: he is "being kept updated."
Asked about a Hamas weapons operative handed a British passport who moved guns across Europe: silence.
He found the words to attack a British father in seconds. He cannot find words for the people who were almost blown up this morning.
This is the government that calls you racist for wanting to know who is crossing the border. This is the government that houses asylum seekers in better accommodation than 75% of the working families funding it. This is the government that gave a Hamas weapons operative a British passport and then a century of anonymity when he was caught. This is the government that sat on an IRGC threat against British soil and left a pensioner to do the job of the security services.
They are not failing to protect you. They are choosing not to.
A villager stopped the attack this morning. Not the Prime Minister. Not MI5. Not the Home Office. A resident who looked out of a window at 00:45 and knew something was wrong.
They were right. This government was asleep.
Every fact in this post is verified and sourced. Screenshot it. Share it. They will not tell you. So we have to.
GROK ANALYSIS OF POST:
Yes, the core details about the call and the incident are accurate.
Multiple mainstream news outlets (BBC, The Guardian, CNN and others) reported the same sequence on 27 September 2026, based on police statements:
- Gloucestershire Police received a call at about 00:45 BST regarding three suspicious vehicles travelling towards RAF Fairford.
- Armed officers responded and arrested five men near the village of Whelford (roughly two miles from the base).
- The men were initially held on suspicion of offences under the Explosives Act and later further arrested on suspicion of the preparation of a terrorist act.
- A major incident was declared, around 85 households in Whelford were evacuated, a 400-metre cordon was put in place, and an Army bomb-disposal team (including a robot) examined the vehicles.
- Counter Terrorism Policing is leading the investigation. Police have indicated the operation was not intelligence-led — it began with the public report.
The Guardian specifically described it as stemming from a late-night 999 call after a resident noticed the vans and (in one account) found the airbase police number did not answer, so dialled 999.
Other elements in the original post that track with reporting include:
- RAF Fairford’s use by US forces for operations related to Iran, and the IRGC’s July 2026 statement naming the base a “legitimate target.”
- The separate case of the man with reported Hamas bodyguard links who received UK asylum/citizenship and was later arrested in connection with a European plot (details reported by The Times and others around the same period, with anonymity restrictions in the UK).
The post’s stronger interpretive claims (about government priorities, intent, or systemic failure) are the author’s opinion rather than verified facts. The factual account of the 999 call, the arrests, the evacuations, and the non-intelligence-led nature of the response matches official and contemporaneous reporting.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Thank God, and God Bless that pensioner.
“Thank God, and God Bless that pensioner.”
I’ll lay odds he’s arrested for racism.
L
That would be the expected response, wouldn’t it?
Can a member of the public just pick up the phone and call GCHQ?
It's a good thing that pensioner didn't slash the tires on those terrorist vans.
Well did they find any bombs yet?
Gaza Health Minister??
I can just see the "Minister's" memos:
Throw this guy off the 10 story building.
Throw the other guy off of the 15 story building.
UK gubmit arresting the callers in three, two one......
Andy "Aloha Snackbar" Burnham, prime minister of the United Caliphate.
Some logic for people here to consider:
1) The British police arrest Middle Easterners for Terrorism
2) Yet they say to the British People: “Don’t worry about it, no big deal, and definitely don’t call them terrorists, at least at this point.”
3) While, at the same time, police are knocking on doors of Brits and threatening/arresting them for posting criticism of Immigration.
4) Why is the British government defending immigrant terrorism, while not allowing any criticism of immigration?
5) Perhaps it’s because they fear the public turning against the mass importation of Middle Eastern men of fighting age? In other words, they need the importation...but for what end?
6) There is only one answer, and I’ll leave you guys to figure it out. But here’s a clue - think Lebanon.
Stupid-ass article. If it happened here, who’d know how to contact DoW or FBI? Of course they would call 911.
Dratts!! Foiled by a ‘Karen’...
Trump says we had them under surveillance for a long time. So Mr. President when were you going to pull the plug? After they pulled the plug? Something isn’t right here. You don’t wait until it goes BANG to acknowledge we knew about them.
Trump says we had them under surveillance for a long time. So Mr. President when were you going to pull the plug? After they pulled the plug? Something isn’t right here. You don’t wait until it goes BANG to acknowledge we knew about them.
It hadn’t gone “bang.” That’s the thing. I’m used to hearing stories of the aftermath of attacks. If other plots are stopped beforehand, it makes some sense not to publicize them so soon so the larger network can be uncovered.
I’m glad they were caught and we know about it. But I’m surprised to hear about it so soon after.
I was going to call you on this, but you are right:
US President Donald Trump tells reporters that the men arrested near RAF Fairford on Sunday were “looking to do big damage”.
“We had them under investigation. They were looking to do big damage to our fort, and working with the British worked out great,” he says.
“It may have been Scotland Yard, I don’t know. We worked with a lot of them. We had them under view for a long time, and we got them.
“It was fantastic. Working with Britain, it was an amazing job.”
I don’t understand why the President said this, unless the X post isn’t true, and while a pensioner called 999, the Brits actually were tracking these Snackbar boys?
Given how so many people in the UK get arrested and jailed for social media posts, I’m surprised the authorities in the UK didn’t arrest the woman who called 999, she probably described the people as middle eastern and that can get you arrested over there.
What I heard was the farmer called the base number but no one picked up so he called the police...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.