Christian
@InTheTrenchesUK
·
7h
THIS MORNING. RAF FAIRFORD. 00:45.
A pensioner called 999. Not MI5. Not GCHQ. A villager spotted three suspicious vans heading toward a US bomber base and dialled 999.
Five men arrested under the Explosives Act, then upgraded to Section 5 of the Terrorism Act: preparation of a terrorist act. Three vans. 85 homes evacuated at 1.30am. Army bomb disposal robot inside a 400-metre cordon. Counter Terrorism Policing now leading. Major incident declared.
The operation was not intelligence-led. A resident made a phone call. That is what stopped it.
The IRGC already told you this was coming.
In July 2026, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a formal statement naming RAF Fairford specifically as "a legitimate target." They cited the US B-1B bombers striking Iran from British soil, authorised first by Keir Starmer in March 2026 and continued by Prime Minister Andy Burnham. They published the threat. They named the base. Seven months later five men turned up at it after midnight. The intelligence services had no warning. A villager did.
Now the part they really do not want you to know.
Last November the National Crime Agency arrested a man in central London on a German warrant. His name is Mohammed Naim. Son of Basem Naim, Hamas politburo member, former Gaza health minister, US-sanctioned terrorist. Mohammed served as personal bodyguard to Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh from 2006. He was photographed doing it. AFP published the images. In 2010 Egyptian police arrested him for smuggling weapons and gold through tunnels into Gaza. That arrest was documented. On record. Available to any Home Office caseworker.
In 2015 he walked into a British Home Office and claimed asylum. They gave it to him.
Theresa May's Home Office granted him indefinite leave to remain. He later received full British citizenship. Changed his name. More than once. Settled in suburban England as an IT consultant. Raised a family. The state never looked twice.
In summer 2025 he travelled to Berlin. Collected five handguns and ammunition from a Hamas contact. Drove to Vienna. Stored the weapons in a storage unit. Recorded a propaganda video announcing the plot. Target: Jewish community centres, Israeli diplomats, pro-Israel events across Germany and Austria. Timed for the second anniversary of October 7.
Mossad and German intelligence foiled it. British intelligence did not find it.
A court granted him anonymity for 100 years. He sits in a British cell while Germany waits for extradition. The state that gave him the passport is now hiding his identity. Indefinitely.
Now look at what your Prime Minister found time for this morning.
While five men were arrested at gunpoint outside an airbase the IRGC had publicly threatened, while 85 families were evacuated in the middle of the night, while bomb disposal robots crawled through vans a mile from sleeping US bomber crews, Andy Burnham was on the BBC.
He was asked about Daniel Thomas. A father of four. A former soldier. A working man. And Burnham said it is "hard to conclude" he is "anything other than someone who has racist views."
Instant. Confident. No hesitation. No "inappropriate to comment."
Asked about five terrorism arrests at a US bomber base: "It would be inappropriate to comment further whilst investigations are ongoing."
Asked about 85 families evacuated at midnight with zero intelligence warning: he is "being kept updated."
Asked about a Hamas weapons operative handed a British passport who moved guns across Europe: silence.
He found the words to attack a British father in seconds. He cannot find words for the people who were almost blown up this morning.
This is the government that calls you racist for wanting to know who is crossing the border. This is the government that houses asylum seekers in better accommodation than 75% of the working families funding it. This is the government that gave a Hamas weapons operative a British passport and then a century of anonymity when he was caught. This is the government that sat on an IRGC threat against British soil and left a pensioner to do the job of the security services.
They are not failing to protect you. They are choosing not to.
A villager stopped the attack this morning. Not the Prime Minister. Not MI5. Not the Home Office. A resident who looked out of a window at 00:45 and knew something was wrong.
They were right. This government was asleep.
Every fact in this post is verified and sourced. Screenshot it. Share it. They will not tell you. So we have to.
GROK ANALYSIS OF POST:
Yes, the core details about the call and the incident are accurate.
Multiple mainstream news outlets (BBC, The Guardian, CNN and others) reported the same sequence on 27 September 2026, based on police statements:
- Gloucestershire Police received a call at about 00:45 BST regarding three suspicious vehicles travelling towards RAF Fairford.
- Armed officers responded and arrested five men near the village of Whelford (roughly two miles from the base).
- The men were initially held on suspicion of offences under the Explosives Act and later further arrested on suspicion of the preparation of a terrorist act.
- A major incident was declared, around 85 households in Whelford were evacuated, a 400-metre cordon was put in place, and an Army bomb-disposal team (including a robot) examined the vehicles.
- Counter Terrorism Policing is leading the investigation. Police have indicated the operation was not intelligence-led — it began with the public report.
The Guardian specifically described it as stemming from a late-night 999 call after a resident noticed the vans and (in one account) found the airbase police number did not answer, so dialled 999.
Other elements in the original post that track with reporting include:
- RAF Fairford’s use by US forces for operations related to Iran, and the IRGC’s July 2026 statement naming the base a “legitimate target.”
- The separate case of the man with reported Hamas bodyguard links who received UK asylum/citizenship and was later arrested in connection with a European plot (details reported by The Times and others around the same period, with anonymity restrictions in the UK).
The post’s stronger interpretive claims (about government priorities, intent, or systemic failure) are the author’s opinion rather than verified facts. The factual account of the 999 call, the arrests, the evacuations, and the non-intelligence-led nature of the response matches official and contemporaneous reporting.
