Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: The FCC accepted SpaceX’s 100,000-satellite Starlink Gen3 application for filing.
X ^ | 09/20/2026 | DogeDesigner

Posted on 09/19/2026 5:16:07 PM PDT by SmokingJoe

BREAKING: The FCC accepted SpaceX’s 100,000-satellite Starlink Gen3 application for filing.

Each V3 satellite is designed for up to 1 Tbps downlink, 160 Gbps uplink and six 400 Gbps space lasers. Starship launches will add ~20× the capacity of Falcon 9 launches of V2 satellites.


(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fcc; gen3; musk; satellites; spacexai; spcx; starlink

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
The SpaceXAI juggernaut continues to storm ahead.
1 posted on 09/19/2026 5:16:07 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Glad I snagged those 15 SPCX shares at IPO price.


2 posted on 09/19/2026 5:36:04 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
SpaceX’s 100,000-satellite Gen3 Starlink application has officially entered the FCC review process

The FCC accepted SpaceX’s application for filing on September 18

SpaceX is requesting authority to deploy up to 100,000 Gen3 satellites across two very-low-Earth-orbit altitude groups:

• 323–327.5 km
• 473–477.5 km
• Multiple orbital inclinations from 26° to 96.9°

the scale is insane

SpaceX is planning an entirely different scale of satellite internet...with the ambition to deliver far more capacity and lower-latency connectivity around the world

Gen1 built Starlink
Gen2 scaled it
Gen3 is aiming at an entirely different scale

https://x.com/XFreeze/status/2101416616395252086

3 posted on 09/19/2026 5:37:56 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I’m not sure a lot of investors are really grasping how big of a moat SPCX has right now. There is nobody in the US who is even remotely close to the capabilities as SPCX, including NASA. China may or may not have some capability, but it is doubtful they are even close. So, I expect China will have to up their espionage game and steal more.

So honestly, I understand SPCX is spending a lot right now and not yet turning the income wheel commensurately at the moment, but it is hard for me to not see SPCX hitting near $300 and then beyond.

The only downside I foresee is the off chance that a Democrat administration follows Trump (heaven forbid) but a Democrat administration will surely try to take a wrecking ball to SPCX and TSLA.


4 posted on 09/19/2026 5:44:08 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Das be why Dey built da Starship…


5 posted on 09/19/2026 5:45:30 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

They broke ground already on the Louisiana Spaceport. That scale and proposed tempo of that operation is staggering.


6 posted on 09/19/2026 5:49:34 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Because that scale is needed for AI data centers in space.

Lots of empty buildings on earth in 10-20 years. Probably turn ‘em into mega-mosques.


7 posted on 09/19/2026 5:51:04 PM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Glad I snagged those 15 SPCX shares at IPO price.


Tell me about it. I bought a bunch after the typical IPO boom and bust. Paia bout $122 a share.


8 posted on 09/19/2026 5:51:49 PM PDT by chaosagent ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

It hit $108 six weeks ago, now $153. Big jump in six weeks. Getting in at $122 was good.


9 posted on 09/19/2026 5:55:15 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Agreed, and while outlets like Yahoo Financial and their subordinate free-lance reporters, hate Musk/SPCX/TSLA, and almost always throw shade, I do think SPCX very well could be the next Alphabet, Amazon, Apple or similar.


10 posted on 09/19/2026 6:05:41 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I have 13 shares with a cost basis of about $132 per. Very satisfied.


11 posted on 09/19/2026 6:08:53 PM PDT by jimfree (My 23 y/o granddaughter has more quality exec experience than most Dem pres candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

“SPCX very well could be the next Alphabet, Amazon, Apple or similar.”

My thinking, too. I bought the shares as Christmas gifts for the kids, spouses, and grandkid. Thought it would be a fun Christmas present.


12 posted on 09/19/2026 6:09:16 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe; Lazamataz

This is very big news.

Hugh and Series, even.


13 posted on 09/19/2026 6:19:42 PM PDT by Candor7 ( Ask not for whom the Trump Trolls,He trolls for thee!<img src="" width=300</img><a href="">tag</a>))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
The only downside I foresee is the off chance that a Democrat administration follows Trump (heaven forbid) but a Democrat administration will surely try to take a wrecking ball to SPCX and TSLA.

This. Nevertheless, news never is the driver of share price. The huge entities/individuals already know what is going to happen and have already made their moves. If you get in at a good price, you're just lucky. Technical analysis can get you a little bit of an edge, but it is just a very little. Prove me wrong.

14 posted on 09/19/2026 6:27:34 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Remember Iridium? It was conceived in 1987 by Motorola engineers who wanted a handheld phone that worked everywhere on Earth -- like Starlink is going to do soon. In the 80s, cellular coverage was still sparse, so a constellation of low-Earth-orbit satellites looked like a way to skip towers altogether. The system was announced in 1990, built through the decade, and opened commercially in November 1998: 66 operational satellites, global coverage, and a working mesh in the sky.

The economics never caught the idea. The network cost on the order of $5–7 billion to design, build, and launch on expendable rockets. Handsets ran about $3,000; calls cost several dollars a minute; the phones were bulky and needed a clear view of the sky. Break-even required hundreds of thousands of subscribers. By early 1999 Iridium had only about 10,000. Terrestrial cellular had filled in the cities and travel routes its target customers actually used. In August 1999 the company filed one of the era’s largest bankruptcies.

That was not the end of the hardware. After Motorola nearly de-orbited the fleet, a buyer group acquired the assets for about $25 million, shed most of the debt, slashed operating costs, and rebuilt around government, maritime, aviation, and industrial users. Iridium survived as a profitable L-band niche: small devices, polar coverage, weather-robust links. The original consumer-phone business did not.

Iridium was, in that sense, early. It proved that a LEO constellation could serve the whole planet. What it could not do was pay for that constellation on single-use rockets and a luxury voice tariff. Launch was a one-shot commercial purchase. Satellites were custom and expensive. The design was locked in for years while the ground market moved.

Elon Musk singularly drove SpaceX to change the cost side and to vertically integrate. He treated the booster as reusable hardware, not disposable fireworks, and wrapped rockets, satellites, user terminals, and the network into one company. Falcon 9 landings and rapid reuse made it possible to fly dozens of mass-produced satellites per mission at internal cost. Starlink then used that line to sell broadband rather than voice minutes: home and enterprise internet, ships, aircraft, remote sites. Thousands of satellites, monthly pricing, and iterated dishes replaced a 66-satellite phone network billed by the minute. Starship is the same bet at larger scale.

After Iridium flopped with Moto backing, I figured the whole idea of an economical LEO constellation was dead. Musk's ability to create a vision and execute is astonishing. Whoever would have anticipated one man doing that?

Iridium launched 66 satellites altogether. Starlink today has about 11,000 operational. The U.S. has authorized about 19,408 — a modified first-generation grant of 4,408 plus 15,000 Gen2 satellites. Still waiting on the FCC: SpaceX’s Gen2 application was for 29,988 satellites.

SpaceX filed for a Gen3 / V3 constellation of up to 100,000 satellites in early July 2026. On 18 September 2026 the FCC accepted the application for filing — meaning the paperwork is complete enough to go on public notice and enter review (that is not approval). Gen2 was treated the same way: SpaceX asked for nearly 30,000, and the FCC has so far authorized 15,000, with the rest deferred.

15 posted on 09/19/2026 6:29:15 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I bought at $113. Wish I had bought more.


16 posted on 09/19/2026 6:29:48 PM PDT by 6ppc (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act -George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Of course you’re right, but what really struck me is that some mega investors have placed insane money in SPCX. For example, it is my understanding that Harvard put all, or almost all of its portfolio into SPCX. Cathy Wood (with a grain of salt) has been putting tens of millions into it. Other big boys, who escape me at the moment, have also quietly added big positions.

So yeah, the little retail guy is hard-pressed to make anything in the market, but it appears to me that some big whales are dropping serious money here.


17 posted on 09/19/2026 6:33:48 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

I have almost $60k work of astrophotography gear in my little observatory. 100,000 low orbit satellites will really put the kibosh on streak free photos. Software can remove many of those streaks.
I bought $20k work of SPCX at IPO. Down now, but I expect it will climb and climb high enough for daughter to enjoy.


18 posted on 09/19/2026 7:08:36 PM PDT by rustyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Looks like my stock value is going to increase.


19 posted on 09/19/2026 7:11:48 PM PDT by TermLimits4All ("If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
“The only downside I foresee is the off chance that a Democrat administration follows Trump (heaven forbid) but a Democrat administration will surely try to take a wrecking ball to SPCX and TSLA.”

We just had 4 years of the horrid Biden regime, and all that happened was Musk became much more powerful and far richer, despite all the best efforts of the DEI African American women in the Biden DOJ who even tried to order Musk/SpaceX to hire Haitian migrants.

20 posted on 09/20/2026 12:12:08 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson