I’m not sure a lot of investors are really grasping how big of a moat SPCX has right now. There is nobody in the US who is even remotely close to the capabilities as SPCX, including NASA. China may or may not have some capability, but it is doubtful they are even close. So, I expect China will have to up their espionage game and steal more.
So honestly, I understand SPCX is spending a lot right now and not yet turning the income wheel commensurately at the moment, but it is hard for me to not see SPCX hitting near $300 and then beyond.
The only downside I foresee is the off chance that a Democrat administration follows Trump (heaven forbid) but a Democrat administration will surely try to take a wrecking ball to SPCX and TSLA.
They broke ground already on the Louisiana Spaceport. That scale and proposed tempo of that operation is staggering.
This. Nevertheless, news never is the driver of share price. The huge entities/individuals already know what is going to happen and have already made their moves. If you get in at a good price, you're just lucky. Technical analysis can get you a little bit of an edge, but it is just a very little. Prove me wrong.
We just had 4 years of the horrid Biden regime, and all that happened was Musk became much more powerful and far richer, despite all the best efforts of the DEI African American women in the Biden DOJ who even tried to order Musk/SpaceX to hire Haitian migrants.
We just had 4 years of the horrid Biden regime, and all that happened was Musk became much more powerful and far richer, despite all the best efforts of the DEI African American women in the Biden DOJ who even tried to order Musk/SpaceX to hire Haitian migrants.
Addendum to 20.
Grok:
During the Biden administration, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division—led by Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke (a Black woman and the first Black woman in that role)—sued SpaceX in August 2023 over its hiring practices regarding asylees and refugees.
justice.gov
The lawsuit (an administrative complaint under the Immigration and Nationality Act's anti-discrimination provisions) alleged that from at least September 2018 to May 2022, SpaceX systematically discouraged asylees and refugees from applying, failed to fairly consider their applications, and refused to hire them based on citizenship status. SpaceX had publicly and in job postings stated that export control laws (primarily ITAR, covering rockets and related technology) limited hiring to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents (“green card holders”). The DOJ argued this interpretation was incorrect: asylees and refugees have indefinite work authorization, stand on equal footing with citizens/green-card holders under those export rules for the positions at issue, and cannot be categorically excluded on citizenship grounds. The complaint noted very few (essentially one identified asylee) such hires out of thousands during the period and sought remedies including ending the practice, considering affected applicants, back pay, and civil penalties.
justice.gov
Clarke publicly described the findings, stating that SpaceX had imposed what amounted to a ban on hiring asylees and refugees regardless of qualifications. Asylees and refugees are legal migrants who have been granted status after fleeing persecution and undergoing U.S. government vetting; they are not undocumented or unauthorized workers. SpaceX (and Elon Musk) contested the claims, arguing compliance with export-control restrictions on sensitive technology was required and that the suit was improper or politically motivated. The case was later dropped by the Trump-era DOJ in early 2025.
nytimes.com
This matches the core of the claim (a prominent Black woman official in the Biden DOJ acting against SpaceX over employment of certain legal migrants/asylees/refugees), but it was an enforcement lawsuit alleging illegal discrimination rather than a direct “order” to hire migrants in general or unauthorized ones. No evidence supports a broader mandate targeting SpaceX for random or illegal migrant employment.