Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Mace Recommends What Many Are Too Polite to Suggest for Lindsay Clancy
PJ Media ^ | 9/16/2026 | Matt Margolis

Posted on 09/17/2026 8:07:28 AM PDT by simpson96

When TMZ DC asked Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) about Lindsay Clancy's murder case this week, she was blunt. In fact, I think she said exactly what a lot of people have been thinking but are generally too polite to say out loud.(snip)

When TMZ DC’s Jacob Wasserman mentioned Reddington’s pardon request to Mace, she vented her uninhibited opinion. "Which is how retarded it is," she said. "He knows, as an attorney in the state of Massachusetts, you can't ask for a federal pardon for a state case. I mean, it doesn't take a lawyer — I’m not even a lawyer, I didn't go to law school — it doesn't take a lawyer to figure that out. It was just a publicity stunt. I think it's nasty; it's ugly."

Mace had more to say on the subject. "Her children are dead. She should be dead, too," she averred. "She should get the death penalty. It should be public. It should be a public execution."

I don't think Wasserman could wrap his head around what she was saying, and he pushed to spell out exactly what she meant: "So when you say public execution, spell that out for me."

If he expected her to walk it back, he was very wrong.

Mace laid it out. "It could be by a firearm, it could be electric chair — I don't really care. Not an injection," she said, adding that it should stand as "a warning to women everywhere. You don't kill your kids." When Wasserman suggested that might be "a little out of bounds," Mace rejected his premise outright and doubled down. "Absolutely not," she said. "Child rapists, too — add them to the list of public executions. If people can get away with murdering children, what else can they do?"

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: simpson96

She is very bold and direct.

She is so right about this evil amoral
monster.
I am glad she let it rip.

This devious plotting monster needs to be executed just like the
way this butcher tormented her lovely babies for three hours.
Its one of the most haunting tortured deaths I can ever recall.


21 posted on 09/17/2026 9:07:53 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I’m sure tho our favorite lesbian governor will wade right in and issue a state pardon…once things have settled a bit - surrounded with a gaggle of demon possessed women to cheer her on. Anyone happy to murder babies up to birth has no scruples about pardoning a ‘mother’ who did hers postpartum. MA is a failed state.


22 posted on 09/17/2026 9:21:03 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Assuming that 1/12=8.33% is a good estimate of the fraction of potential jurors in Massachusetts who could vote to convict Lindsay Clancy, then the probability of populating a jury with 12 such jurors to arrive at a unanimous verdict of guilty is (1/12)^12=(0.0833)^12=10^(-13).


23 posted on 09/17/2026 9:23:52 AM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel
And there it is ladies and gentleman!

The Absolutely DUMBEST thing you will read today.

Written by a troll who admits he/she or it knows nothing about what they are talking about but willing to proclaim it with total confidence.

24 posted on 09/17/2026 9:29:00 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (I just want FReepers to READ THE ARTICLE. And then think 30 secs before pounding keyboard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
The request for a federal pardon is just an attempt to bring Trump into this mess.

Everyone knows that a federal pardon is useless in a state crime. Furthermore, since no verdict was reached, she was not convicted, so how can she receive a pardon?

No, this is about forcing Trump to act, then exploiting it to form a "pink wave" in the upcoming election. I know Trump's not running, the wave is to target anyone he endorsed. If they can throw the election and get control of the Senate and the House, then Trump is a powerless lame duck for the rest of his term.

The issue is never the issue...

25 posted on 09/17/2026 9:29:52 AM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
When Wasserman suggested that might be "a little out of bounds,"

What a cuck.

26 posted on 09/17/2026 9:43:39 AM PDT by kiryandil (I give up with this crew of trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

It’s not the business of a US representative to weigh in on a murder trial.


As I read the except, she was asked her opinion about the stupid idea of Trump’s pardoning the child killer Clancy. Was she supposed to say she had no opinion on the matter?

The fact is the trial and its result has rightly or wrongly shown a decided split in the nation. One side is vilifying and attempting criminalize the juror who voted to find Clancy guilty and the other is holding him up as a hero.

It reminds me a bit of how the nation viewed John Brown in the 1850s. Half the nation saw him as a hero and half saw him as a monster.


27 posted on 09/17/2026 9:45:51 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Preferably in the public square.


28 posted on 09/17/2026 9:47:14 AM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

“The probability of actually having a competent jury who will convict Lindsay Clancy for deliberately murdering her children is, based on a recent finding, only 0.0833%.”

There was never any question as to whether she did it or not...she did. But the history of mental illlness and the over-prescribing of mind drugs by many doctors does create the entrance of reasonable doubt of whether she was even aware of what she was doing at the time of the action.

They found her in her back yard attempting suicide and she has been committed to a mental facility after the trial. Definately reasonable doubt. But, she’s in the same as prison in the institution. Hope she stays there for her own good and that of her family.

I’m just surprised this made it to court with all the background of mental instability and drug use current at the time of the incident. Defence was stupid but the outcome was the same. She’s committed and hopefully for a while, maybe permanent.

wy69


29 posted on 09/17/2026 9:47:50 AM PDT by whitney69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Since Mace voted with the Democrats to end the Iran conflict while those evil fanatics are still in power bombing our Middle East bases and slaying their citizens she demonstrates lack of practical sense and should not be in any position of influence.


30 posted on 09/17/2026 9:59:47 AM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Hell must certainly be an over-crowded place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

The lawyer’s requesting a federal pardon in this case is merely boosting his billable hours.


31 posted on 09/17/2026 10:06:29 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel
'This trial is simply an outrage vehicle, like all sensational trials.'

I think it's more than that, but you're correct that it has become an 'outrage vehicle'.
32 posted on 09/17/2026 10:08:00 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

A short drop and a sudden stop, given the infanticide in question, would put the appropriate punctuation at the end of the sentence.


33 posted on 09/17/2026 10:18:37 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Imagine what we'll know tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“It should be a public execution.”

Punishments are meant in part to send a message those considering the given crime, but a public execution is too barbaric for us. Other cultures, maybe not.


34 posted on 09/17/2026 10:25:23 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

BURN lmao


35 posted on 09/17/2026 10:37:54 AM PDT by al baby (Sarcasm )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Lock her up in solitary confinement with exercise bands


36 posted on 09/17/2026 10:54:40 AM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

Well said!


37 posted on 09/17/2026 10:54:51 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

“I suggest she be hanged by the neck until dead.”

Three times. Once for each child. Take her to the edge of Hell twice, resuscitate her twice, then finish her off. Let her experience a little of the agony each baby endured.


38 posted on 09/17/2026 10:58:43 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

She was asked; she responded.

Of course it’s her right to make bold statements! Have any RATs ever held their tongues expounding on ANYTHING?

When you become a public servant you don’t forfeit your 1A rights.


39 posted on 09/17/2026 11:02:46 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

She wouldn’t be getting any pardon anyway. Her lawyer’s full of shit.


40 posted on 09/17/2026 11:05:33 AM PDT by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man, but it's okay... I wasn't married to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson