Posted on 09/08/2026 2:06:59 PM PDT by fruser1
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
That’s the picture!
Sheer and perfectly unbothered obstinacy.
“it was clear the husband committed the murders.” Oh, sure. But the mother said she did it.
One man.
Like Yeltsin. Like Tiennamen. Like David.
I’ve served on quite a few juries. One was even a first degree murder trial. I have seen the idiots that actually get selected and been in the jury room with them. Here it seems that teachers or government employees are always selected. And most of them have no logical thinking skills. We were deadlocked in the murder trial by a black gal who didn’t see that he was guilty. When asked why she said they didn’t prove blah blah blah. I laughed, shook my head, and said....yes they did, but it was WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING! We then had to ask the judge if that part of the transcript could be reread to the jury so she could hear it. Being on a jury is extremely frustrating for someone who can actually think logically.
I have read all of the FR comments and nobody has said that they would like to see the ENTIRE VIDEO OF THE INTERVIEW with these three jurors.
So now I am saying that I would like to see the entire UNCUT video.
https://truthsocial.com/@CitizenFreePress/posts/117238324146034414
The first one in particular looks like a poster-creature for radical feminism. Of course she (it?) would want to acquit a mentally unstable woman who murdered her children - these sorts of crusades are its life mission.
“Exactly as I would picture them. The crazy cat owning wine drinking frumpy white lib women stereotypes write themselves.”
Can you imagine the smell in the deliberation room?
Stale wine from the night before.
Seeping from every pore in those women’s bodies.
Yuck!
As I said, I’ve never been selected for a jury because of my PhD.
It’s too bad that teachers, to whom we trust the education of our children, are such dumb-dumbs. We trust them to enable children to learn to read, do basic math, and begin to learn science, literature, history, government, etc.
Not good!
If you have any scientific background at all, no attorney is going to want you on a case that relies heavily upon forensic evidence. Criminal defense attorneys want you to listen to their BS, not leverage factual knowledge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.