Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/07/2026 7:11:45 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: dennisw

This is pro-family so looks good. But looks like a huge opportunity for fraud and pick up an extra $9000. Muslims will love this. Same for third world “migrants”.


2 posted on 09/07/2026 7:14:01 AM PDT by dennisw ("If they make something really good, they will inevitably stop making it." - Robert Quine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

more government handouts to abuse ...


3 posted on 09/07/2026 7:16:30 AM PDT by bankwalker (Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Hopefully it has some scam protection since muslims will scam the hell out of this.


5 posted on 09/07/2026 7:18:45 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Mr. Mom much happy?.


6 posted on 09/07/2026 7:20:19 AM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Oh no! The Learing centers may go out of business!


7 posted on 09/07/2026 7:22:25 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Just increase the deduction for children and be done with it. If you hand out money they will take advantage of it.


8 posted on 09/07/2026 7:24:03 AM PDT by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Scamailis are sad


10 posted on 09/07/2026 7:27:12 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Maybe Somalis have been practicing this policy for years in Minnesota.


11 posted on 09/07/2026 7:28:30 AM PDT by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Democrat heads are exploding.

It will be funny to hear how they are against this.


12 posted on 09/07/2026 7:31:35 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Let parents borrow from their Social Security fund.


13 posted on 09/07/2026 7:32:38 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

“child care”

One mom could work 3 days one week and another could work 4 days one week.

They could then alternate.

3,4
4,3
3,4
4,3
....

The non-working mom could watch the working mom’s kid(s).

If they worked 10 hours a day, they’d average 35 hours a week at say Amazon.

****

In retail or restaurant and if the daddies had M-F jobs,

It could be Saturday[10 hours] & Sunday[10 hours] for both plus two weekdays[8 hours+8 hours] for 36 hours/week each.


14 posted on 09/07/2026 7:35:42 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

NO, no, no. This is ridiculous. Does no one in Washington DC understand $40 Trillion in debt? All child care subsidies need to stop. Along with paying family members to take care of their own. That’s what family is supposed to do.


15 posted on 09/07/2026 7:36:15 AM PDT by Twotone (Sometimes I wrestle with my demons. Sometimes we just snuggle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

Unmarried couples suing in 3,2,1.


16 posted on 09/07/2026 7:36:55 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

We are all socialists and grifters now.


17 posted on 09/07/2026 7:37:45 AM PDT by buckalfa (More chaos and disruption please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

At first, I thought this was for all mothers, but thankfully it’s for married mothers. There are many single mothers out there with the baby daddy living in the house, and if they want it, the baby daddy needs to step up and do the right thing.


19 posted on 09/07/2026 7:43:24 AM PDT by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

When I was born in 1958, federal welfare was I believe limited to public housing and hospital construction subsidies.


21 posted on 09/07/2026 7:50:15 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

I am 100% supportive of the goal. But social engineering doesn’t suddenly become a good thing when we do it. It’s still socail engineering.

And the government can’t give you anything it hasn’t first taken from someone by force.


24 posted on 09/07/2026 7:58:31 AM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Democrat cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

The skinnies will take the money and have a slave tend the piccaskinnies.


26 posted on 09/07/2026 8:00:42 AM PDT by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

The federal welfare system was built piecemeal.

Each program is independent of the other and it encourages fraud and abuse at every possible opportunity.

What might be done instead is to have the welfare component of Social Security be used to fund most federal welfare benefits. The exceptions would be housing and medical.

If you got SNAP benefits now, you’d get less Social Security later on unless you repaid the federal government for the SNAP benefits.

But you say you’re hungry, then take the SNAP benefits as if you starve to death you won’t live to get Social Security anyway.

Ditto for Obamaphones, TANF, etc.

Would your Social Security be reduced? Only if you got welfare. Most people would get the same amount of Social Security. It would come as Earned SS and Welfare SS each month.

What about disabled children?

Parents and care providers could take a realistic look at Junior’s prospects.

It might be better to put the cost of Junior’s special education into a trust fund managed along with the state pension system and let Junior stay at home.

What about housing? States control the cost of construction.

Hotels used to have basic rooms only with bathrooms down the hall and no guest kitchens whatsoever.

Over a period of 10 years, federal housing subsidies could be phased out, first by freezing the amounts and after five years lowering the subsidies by 20% per year.


32 posted on 09/07/2026 8:19:01 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw

States might mandate a worker benefit fund.

That might be set at roughly 70% of the amount of a PPACA silver plan for a 60-year-old, which might come to $800/month (or $5/hour for a part-timer).

The 60-year-old worker would simply take employer health benefits.

The 25-year-old might take employer health benefits at say $400/month and put the remainder into a state pension plan managed investment trust at the rate of $400/month which might be used to pay for childcare, used as a down payment for a house, used for living expenses if unemployed or entering retirement.

States might phase in such a system in over five years.


34 posted on 09/07/2026 8:39:42 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson