Posted on 09/05/2026 1:41:53 PM PDT by Red Badger
Some intriguing information has come out regarding the feelings of the female jurors after they failed in their quest to let Lindsay Clancy get away with murdering her three little children. And it's safe to say they were not happy.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Judge William Sullivan officially declared a mistrial today in the Clancy murder trial while defense attorney Kevin Reddington melted down.
Reddington later asked the Massachusetts Supreme Court for relief, which was denied.
This was all made possible allegedly due to one brave male juror who refused to give in to bullying from both Clancy's defense team and the female jurors.
Following Judge Sullivan's declaration of a mistrial, CNN's Jean Casarez shared some very interesting details regarding the reactions of the female jurors, all of whom wanted Clancy to walk.
First, all of the jurors were tense as the judge spoke. One female was in despair as she shook her head, while another angrily clenched her fists.
Another woman was so distraught that she could not open her eyes.
Casarez then shared that another dismayed female juror pursed her lips while another nodded her head.
WATCH:
Female jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial were in total shambles as the judge declared a mistrial thanks to a lone holdout juror.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Modern feminism was hatched this way. It has, from the very beginning, seen children as an inconvenience to be eliminated.
I have to be honest... that surprised me. I didnt think they had whack jobs back then. and they didnt have the medications women have now to use as an excuse.
And that was the time is all started...
“After four years, partly due to a national effort to deinstitutionalize mental patients, Constance was released into her husband’s custody on March 6, 1959.”
Get 12 Muslims for the next jury and have the prosecution weave Quranic phrases and principles during the case and paint the defendant as the embodiment of jinn witchcraft.
It’s time to repeal the 19th Amendment. It was a terrible mistake. Women should no longer be permitted to hold political office or serve on juries.
They’ve proven themselves incapable of handling that responsibility.
Prove me wrong.
L
I’m a mother of two great people and I’d have had NO POBLEM In convicting her for what this obviously was - premeditated murder.
I might have had some sympathy for her if she had left the kids out of it and just offed herself.
I wouldn't even want one of them to make me a sammich.
She killed 6 children but since she drowned we will never know why.......
How was that jury not vetted better than in was by the prosecutor?
Most definitely
One eye open kiddies. Mommy ain’t done exercising her rights. Procrastination isn’t a crime. Keep an escape plan on hand.
I bet all the women were Democrats. I can’t understand how they would think is OK to murder your own kids?
How can that be? She murdered her children. And you're saying the trial was about whether or not she should be punished? I don't think the law reads like that.
Here’s what the judge gave the jury in the instructions:
BRAVE AI:
The jury in the Lindsay Clancy trial had five potential verdict options to decide her fate:
First-degree murder: Requires proof of deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity/cruelty, punishable by life in prison without parole.
Second-degree murder: Requires proof of criminal responsibility but without the specific aggravating factors of first-degree, punishable by life in prison with the possibility of parole.
Manslaughter: Requires proof of wanton and reckless conduct resulting in death, punishable by up to 20 years in prison per count.
Not guilty by reason of insanity (lack of criminal responsibility): A finding that a mental disease or defect prevented Clancy from understanding her actions were wrong or controlling her conduct, leading to indefinite psychiatric commitment rather than prison.
Not guilty: An acquittal based on the prosecution failing to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy killed the children, which would result in her immediate release.
Ultimately, the jury failed to reach a unanimous decision on any of these five options, resulting in a mistrial declared by Judge William Sullivan on September 4, 2026.
It’s Massachusetts.........
Ah! Reason of insanity is the out.
Thank you!
Can you imagine replacing the legal profession with AI.
They could learn to code
Do people realize that if she does finally get off via the insanity plea, or a straight ‘not guilty’, they might unleash a wave of child murders all across not just the USA but the world at large?..............
I don't either, but I do think we need to do something that takes 'maneuvering' out of the verdict.
First, I think the prosecutors and defense should be required to provide their versions of the case in writing. The jurors should be required to read all of this before the trial. The data can 'also' (not exclusively) be provided by video, and the jurors should be required to review this AND the written record. All of this should be required before the actual trial (but after jury selection).
I say this because the determination of verdict for too many trials is not based on the truth, but on what evidence and data the jury has been allowed to see. This is determined by legal maneuvering that is too often designed to conceal the truth rather than reveal it. Second, I think people on the witness stand should be allowed to say exactly what they think, not what the legal mechanics will let them say (e.g. "Object! Hearsay!). This should be true for both sides. Before the jury is sent out to deliberate they should be provided with further written (or digital) reports that delineate the parts of the testimony that are 'hearsay' or unverified, questionable, etc.
It shouldn't be that real exculpatory or incriminating evidence is blocked by attorneys. If it is questionable evidence, label it as such.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.