Posted on 07/26/2026 1:03:04 PM PDT by Its All Over Except ...
"No. 1 has been tried for the past 5 months with no effect. No. 1 has been tried since 2018 with no effect. No. 3 can't be done because Israel is against it, so everyone will blame Vance and call him an antisemite."
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
🚨 Google AI:
1/2
“Several Jewish public figures, commentators, and Jewish political organizations have accused Vice President JD Vance of implicitly or explicitly tolerating, minimizing, or promoting antisemitic rhetoric, yet several Jewish public figures, commentators, and organizations have strongly pushed back against accusations of antisemitism leveled at Vice President JD Vance. They argue that his critics are mislabeling policy disagreements as hatred or weaponizing the charge for partisan political gain.
Key Arguments and Pushback from the Jewish Community
Separating Foreign Policy from Antisemitism:
Many conservative Jewish commentators align with Vance’s position that debating American foreign policy or skepticism regarding foreign aid packages should not be equated with antisemitism. They argue that labeling isolationist tendencies or specific criticisms of Israeli government actions as “antisemitic” dilutes the term and misidentifies the true sources of anti-Jewish hate.
Focusing on Action Over Rhetoric:
Supporters within conservative and Orthodox Jewish circles point to the administration’s broader actions on security, trade, and regional alignments as proof of alignment with Jewish community safety. They argue that political opponents focus heavily on verbal nuances, social media associations, or media appearances rather than substantive policy impacts.
Nuance on Free Speech and Public Discourse:
Some right-leaning Jewish figures have defended Vance’s appearances on controversial platforms or podcasts, such as his interviews with Tucker Carlson or Joe Rogan. They argue that engaging in open dialogue with platforms that hold diverse audiences is a mainstream political strategy, rather than an implicit endorsement of views held by other guests.”
🚨 2/2
While I sometimes agree with Coulter, and at other times I do not, by looking at the what Coulter said and at the outline provided by Google AI, the following can be ascertained:
Ad Hominem name-calling against Vance does put the opposing interlocutor(s) in the position of having to bolster their assertions against Vance as the burden of proof is upon them.
Speculative assertions, guilt-by-association, and failing to prove actual animus against Jewish people from Vance isn’t evidence.
And good luck providing this due to disagreement between the two sides on what constitutes proof.
#4: Degrade Shia Islam.
I vote for #1, #2 and #4 for at least 6 months.
Could someone please tell the NYT to sit down, shut up and fold their hands?
If we want Iranian propaganda we can get it ourselves.
Drop the bridges.
Bomb the turbines.
Give them the Stone Age.
No wheel.
No electrons.
Subsistence agriculture only.
Sucks to be you!
If only it were that.
Assessments provided by The Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, WSJ, etc, are being lashed out against as well.
Trump already declared victory on March 12th and our objectives were met. He doesn’t want to leave. He is out of control and needs to be removed from office.
Trump, March 12th 2026
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/donald-trump-says-ve-won-081633000.html
“We won. We won. In the first hour it was over, but we won.”
Pete Hegseth, April 8, 2026
https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4454276/epic-fury-quelled-for-now-objectives-accomplished-us-forces-remain-ready/
“Together with our Israeli partners, America’s military achieved every single objective on plan, on schedule, exactly as laid out from day one.”
Yeah, that would work, but it would undermine Trump’s prior assertions that the U.S. isn’t at war with the Iranain people themselves.
The NYT is run by deranged men boys and women girls who live in a fantasy that they know what is going on and they should be listened to.
Why do they address him as Mr. Trump and not President Trump? Error in grammar check?
New York Slimes?
The birds in my birdcage constantly place their comments right on the NYT paper.
They are anti-Democratic Election Deniers....
They are Deep State.
Yeah,IMHO many times the NYT leaves much to be desired, but even then I would argue that Ad Hominem against the NYT has limited appeal, often does not sway Independents and Libertarians, certainly not liberals (be they Dems or liberal RINOs), amd often the best course, be it against what they have written or against another newspaper, is to defeat their arguments.
Ms Coulter needs to proof read her tweets.
The Persians are the unlucky grandchildren of their grandparents’ choices. Let them be a lesson for the ages.
They can be both.
Their base load keel mass and their upper level Lame Stream vocabulary media analytic appearances.
Leftist Delegitimization
That’s why I always try to remember to
use PRESIDENT TRUMP
Why can’t we ban Ann Coulter on FR the same as Tyler Durden?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.