Well I read the article. It’s the second paragraph in the article. But it’s not the second paragraph in the excerpt.
And what I haven’t yet read is why E Pluribus felt the need to hide this paragraph info from us. Does he get his jollies creating confusion?
He went to great pains to omit the second paragraph from his excerpt and he claims it was an accident? Normally I blame posts with bad excerpts on sloppy lazy FReepers. But what EPU did is worse than that.
I should like to give EPU a refresher course on how to post articles here at FR. But I won’t waste my time.
You should have me banned. If you don’t have me banned, you are a coward. You have proved that I commited a capital offense.
OFF WITH MY HEAD!!!
The editors put that same line as their lead-in above the full article, so one might be excused for repeating the editor’s omission if it weren’t for the fact it miscasts the critical aspect of the program that makes it a win.
It’s the sort of slip one could make posting several articles an hour, but so glaring, in this case, I was stunned it was missed.