Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Misery for California shoppers as grocery bills set to spike due to new law (recycling)
NY Post ^ | 7/12/26 | Nina Joudeh

Posted on 07/12/2026 4:21:28 PM PDT by Libloather

Misery on the menu?

California shoppers could soon be paying even more at the checkout line as a sweeping new state recycling measure threatens to send grocery prices soaring, with dairy manufacturers warning some businesses may be forced to shut down or flee the Golden State.

Senate Bill 54 is now entering its first phase of implementation, with companies expected to receive their first bills as early as next month, reported SFGATE.

The measure aims to reduce landfill waste by making manufacturers financially responsible for the packaging they sell after it is thrown away.

It charges companies impact fees on products they sell while also requiring them to phase out packaging that cannot be adequately reused, recycled or composted.

The dairy industry says it stands to be among the hardest hit because many of its products rely on packaging that does not currently meet the measure’s requirements.

CalRecycle, however, estimates the impact will be far smaller, projecting households will pay between $57 and $190 more annually based on data from the California Department of Finance.

Supporters say those added costs are outweighed by shifting the financial burden of packaging waste from taxpayers to the companies that produce it.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Food; History
KEYWORDS: affordability; california; californicated; demagogicparty; garbage; gavinnewsom; gettingitgoodandhard; grocery; law

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Libloather

“making manufacturers financially responsible for the packaging they sell after it is thrown away.”

In what warped concept of law and government is that okay?


21 posted on 07/12/2026 4:51:01 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

California is run by economic criminals.


22 posted on 07/12/2026 4:54:43 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hey - They’re gonna need another brand-new, huge, overpaid bureaucracy to test and evaluate all the different packaging produced by the manufacturers.

Just getting started.


23 posted on 07/12/2026 5:03:21 PM PDT by dagunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I care not.


24 posted on 07/12/2026 5:05:22 PM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“”””The measure aims to reduce landfill waste by making manufacturers financially responsible for the packaging they sell after it is thrown away.””””


If something simply exists, then California is determined to TAX it.

The people of California are foolish enough to believe that such a tax on manufacturers is a good idea.

Yup, the people of California will pay more as the manufacturers increase the price of packaged items sold in the state.

Socialism and totalitarianism is so adept at fooling people.


25 posted on 07/12/2026 5:09:04 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Supporters say those added costs are outweighed by shifting the financial burden of packaging waste from taxpayers to the companies that produce it.

Figures never lie, but liars always figure: Those "saving" will NOT trickle down to the consumer.

26 posted on 07/12/2026 5:09:40 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Mother Nature needs to give El Nino a good spanking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Idiocy supreme reigns in CA


27 posted on 07/12/2026 5:10:57 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
wondering what a cogent argument in opposition

The first argument is that there is no cogent argument FOR the new law.

You could also say such recyclable packaging won't hold the product fresh as long as it will decompose, shortening the supply chain. Instead of an expiration date, your milk will come with a "leak by" date.

28 posted on 07/12/2026 5:11:08 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vision

My heart goes out to conservatives living in that wretched state. There are a lot of them as theFR donations indicate.

Not everyone is in a position to move out.


29 posted on 07/12/2026 5:12:45 PM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Post consumer recycle of most packaging is impossible. Aluminum cans and cardboard boxes are about it and the cost to do so is rediculously expensive in collection, transportation and conversion. The incremental cost of unrecycled packaging in a landfill is miniscule. Landfills are big plastic lined and capped bags of junk that’ll be there forever. So what? We have enough suitable landfill space for all our waste for a thousand years.
So we are turning something that doesn’t cost anything into another tax stream for the government to spend.


30 posted on 07/12/2026 5:20:41 PM PDT by JeanLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Soon California will ban all food except Beans and Rice

Uh Oh!

Beans?

Danger Danger Will Robinson!

There will be an added flatulence tax due to...........yes.............you guessed it............. Globull Climate Crisis!

31 posted on 07/12/2026 5:21:40 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I have owned several businesses. I can guarantee 100% I only got my money from one place. My business may have collected taxes, my companies also remitted taxes collected from customers and employees. Every last cent that my company pad came from the one place that I got all my money from…my customers.

Customers and employees pay taxes. That includes the sales tax on imports.


32 posted on 07/12/2026 5:22:48 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“The measure aims to reduce landfill waste by making manufacturers financially responsible for the packaging they sell after it is thrown away.”

No, it’s the consumers who are going to be financially responsible. The manufacturers will simply pass the cost to them.


33 posted on 07/12/2026 5:25:23 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

“The first argument is that there is no cogent argument FOR the new law. “

One could argue there is a cost for the proper disposal of these various packaging products. And that God charged us to take care of the earth.

And that levying what is essentially a tax on the purveyors of it will pay for proper disposal.

OF COURSE that cost is passed on to the ultimate consumer.


34 posted on 07/12/2026 5:27:11 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Yeah. I am in Canada where we have a supermajority of idiocy which gets worse every week.

Family obligations prevent me from moving, even though my brother and I qualify for US citizenship based on grandparents.

We own a farm in Alberta and may move there eventually if they Separate. But my mother will never leave the West coast so we won’t leave while she is alive.

Observation about both CA and Canada: “Once they get what they voted for they will change...” No...


35 posted on 07/12/2026 5:28:06 PM PDT by Reverend Wright ( Anschluss now !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The cost in this implementation is actually higher than without it so that doesn’t work.

We can’t take care of the earth if we can’t take care of us. The people that advocate these things seem to have forgotten that throughout most of human history, pestilence and famine are real threats. The industry we use today is the only way we can support large populations. Without that industry, we are back to hunter-gatherer days.

And to top it off, just because landfills are unsightly, we are not destroying the earth. We tend it quite well.

So cost and tending are false arguments and again I say there is no cogent argument for the law.


36 posted on 07/12/2026 5:35:48 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Everything they touch turns to Dormbamastuff.
The left - when failure is the only option.
The left - they never learn, because they cannot.


37 posted on 07/12/2026 5:39:11 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

FIRST of all - I LOVE the things that you post. Ping me for the h#ll of it every day, would ya? Could ya? ;)

Secondly - is California messing with the Chocolate Rations, yet? When and if they do, people MIGHT finally wake up to the EVIL that is their State Government! (’1984’)

I lived in that gawd-awful state when water rationing and a WHOLE lot of other things were already accepted without question. Without. Question! Ugh!


38 posted on 07/12/2026 5:39:14 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

They(California voters) voted for this by voting in “woke” legislators who can’t help themselves by coming up with this B.S. They have NO ONE to blame but themselves.


39 posted on 07/12/2026 5:39:50 PM PDT by wetgundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Just when you think they’re running out of stupid ideas


40 posted on 07/12/2026 5:40:43 PM PDT by Dr. Zzyzx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson