Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/09/2026 8:29:02 PM PDT by Red Badger
While disagreeing on most else, teacher unions and conservative education policy reformers share views on cellphone bans, AI guardrails in K-12 public schools.
==================================================================
Teachers unions and education reformers are historically longtime rivals – frequently bumping heads over policies surrounding school choice, parents' rights, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion practices in K-12 schools.
There's one issue, however, upon which these groups agree – that technology, creeping first via phones and now Artificial Intelligence, is interfering with student learning.
"Social media and student personal device use have become a constant presence in our schools,” said Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, the nation’s largest teachers union. “And educators are seeing firsthand the serious impact they can have on student mental health, safety and learning.”
A survey of NEA educators found 90% of them consider the connection between students' mental health and the overuse of personal devices during the school day a “critical concern,” and the NEA offers templates for AI and student personal device policies on their website for districts to address these issues.
School choice advocate Virginia “Ginny” Gentles also has serious concerns about technology overload in the classroom, and she thinks parents, school districts and legislators should share the burden of limiting screen use of children in education settings.
“Smartphones have become constant companions for America’s students and a pernicious source of distraction, anxiety, and academic decline,” she asserted, noting school districts’ proven ability to set guidelines for dress code, attendance, and behavior.
“Banning smartphones from bell-to-bell is no different.”
School districts across the country have enacted laws restricting and outright banning personal technology devices in classrooms.
Cellphone bans – which restrict students' use of personal devices such as phones, iPads, and smartwatches during most of the school day ("instructional time") or all of it ("bell-to-bell") – have grown exponentially in recent years amid rising concerns about their impact on student wellbeing and learning.
Florida’s statewide cellphone ban, instituted in 2023, restricted cellphone use during instructional time. In the years following, the state reported a decrease in suspensions and unexcused absences, and higher test scores.
Aaron Leske, an eighth-grader from Minnesota whose school has a bell-to-bell no-cellphone policy for all middle-schoolers, says he thinks the rules “helps the whole class stay focused [during] work time.”
“Before this rule, phones were a big distraction in class,” he said, adding that students would often use their phones or text each other during instructional time.
“I think the benefits do outweigh the drawbacks because they can get an education without getting distracted by their phones,” he continued.
Thirty-five states and Washington D.C. currently maintain such device-restricting laws – 25 of which are “bell-to-bell.”
Ethical AI practices have also received near-unanimous support amidst concerns over student data privacy, although legislation frequently lags behind the quickly-evolving industry.
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation for Teachers, the nation’s second-largest teachers union, gave a speech in May titled, “Devices Down, Eyes Up, Hands-On: 10 Points to Boost Teaching and Learning in the AI Era,” which rolled out an action plan for school administrators to address growing technology use.
The plan recommends no student-facing AI in K-12 public schools, the establishment of a ‘gold standard’ for AI safety and privacy, independent research on the “effects of AI, screens and technology on students,” and bans on screens for children in Pre-K through 2nd grade.
The document also condemned “social companion” chatbot use at least until the age of 16.
The Heritage Foundation, a voice in conservative education reform, believes the growth of AI is unavoidable – creating an urgent need for guardrails.
“We cannot and should not try to stop AI development. That would be neither realistic nor desirable, especially in an environment where our adversaries will not slow down," the organization said.
Rather, legislators' real quandary is "whether to govern powerful systems early, while leverage still exists, or to react after control has already slipped."
Heritage says that “policymakers and families should scrutinize proposals to adopt artificial intelligence in education,” warning that “when powerful technologies are introduced without clear limits, safeguards often arrive too late.”
“Protecting children, supporting families, and preserving educational integrity must remain the central goals.”
Angela Morabito, spokesperson for Defense of Freedom Institute, a conservative education policy think tank, echoed this, emphasizing the need to retain human-focused education.
“State leaders, local leaders, and parents will need to actively determine what is best for students as [AI] develops,” Morabito told Just the News exclusively.
“No matter how advanced AI becomes, it cannot do the actual work of learning, which is the core of education.”
Despite such unity on cellphone and AI policies, the sides do not align on every aspect of the issue.
After a March event hosted by first lady Melania Trump meant to "empower children with technology and education," featuring "humanoid educators,” the NEA accused the White House of “sidelining educators, parents and communities,” while AFT’s President Weingarten called the initiative “every parent’s nightmare.”
The nation's largest teachers unions also urge increased education funding and frequently decry President Trump’s alliances with big corporations and billionaires.
As part of their ‘Devices Down, Eyes Up, Hands-On’ plan, the AFT recommends a “tech tax,” to force large tech companies to “pay their fair share”—an economic policy most conservative reformers oppose.
Still, broad support for technology restrictions in education remains a cause which transcends political divides, and cellphone policies have been adopted and proven successful in schools across America.
Eighty percent of New York teachers reported positive student outcomes, such as increased engagement and improved social connections, following a statewide ban during the 2025-2026 school year.
“I successfully fought for New York schools to go phone-free because our kids succeed when they’re learning and growing, not clicking and scrolling,” said New York Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul, “and these survey results show our nation-leading policy is working.”
The benefits go beyond basic protections; at Dallas ISD, students checked out 24% more library books following Texas’ state-wide cellphone ban.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Ping!................
When I was a kid in school in the 60’s we couldn’t bring so much as a small transistor radio to school..................
Close the public schools.
They do far more harm than good.
Get rid of teacher unions, Principal Unions and focus on the three R’s..................
I’d be very wary of anything that the teachers’ unions promote. They’re afraid of technology because:
1. Current teachers would have to learn how to use it (they want to just rely on their tenure to provide a sinecure forever without any further requirements or accountability).
2. They want to protect their jobs from erosion to AI and other software that will teach more effectively than they do.
The bottom line is that they’re Luddites whose intention is to stand in the way of technological change any way they can.
If we want to let China get ahead of us, a surefire way is to let them expose their children to modern technology while we prepare our children for a pretend rerun of the 20th century.
Why do teachers need unions?
AI is already political and leans left wing and establishment. AI is bad stuff for kids.
To protect incompetent so-called "teachers".
Can’t they all agree that the current education system is failing to properly teach kids?
Nice. Cell phone bans during “instructional time”...All the more to command the undivided attention of students as they’re being indoctrinated.
Actually I do not want cell phones in the classroom.
I want 24/7 camera recording and audio in each classroom where parents can dial in at any time.
These people need close monitoring.
Kids need protecting.
I want 24/7 camera recording and audio in each classroom where parents can dial in at any time.
These people need close monitoring.
Kids need protecting.
Why do principals nee unions?..............
One should never mistake the focus of Teacher’s unions as being on anything other than themselves. While there are thousands of “real educators” who, for whatever reason, belong to a union and actually care about education our young people, unions do not. Union efforts and monies don’t reflect what they are supposed to be about.
Unions represent their members. Technically that is what they are supposed to do. One union leader said as much, “I represent teachers, not students.”...............
“Why do Principals need union?”
They don’t, except to serve as money laundering entities for the left.
“Unions represent their members.”
The unions also have a desire to get as big and powerful as they can.
That leads to higher salaries and more power for their senior officials—which in turn gets them even higher salaries and even more power.
It is a winning parasite strategy.
Any discussion of students (or anything else for that matter) is propaganda and narrative.
The union wants what it wants—growth in members, growth in salaries for leadership, growth in power, always and forever.
Fine, get rid of cell phones and then get rid of teaching/testing/scoring by chrome books. Use real books that kids have to actually read for more than five minutes at a time. Take tests that include short written answers and essays written on paper that the teacher actually has to grade. Give out Ds for blow average work and Fs for failing work. Give out zeros for work not handed in at all.
Retired jr high teacher
No ‘open book’ tests, either..............
No ‘open book’ tests, either...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.