Posted on 05/25/2026 8:38:35 AM PDT by MarlonRando
A North Carolina woman allegedly shot two lawyers handling a civil lawsuit she filed against police as they were leaving the courthouse.
Gwendolyn White, 57, is charged with two counts of attempted murder after she allegedly shot two attorneys on Friday who were representing the Rolesville Police Department in a civil suit she filed, the News & Observer reports.
The victims, Mary Harris and Jeffrey Whitley, were leaving the Wake County Courthouse when White allegedly shot them in an alleyway.
First
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Most courthouses are gun free zones. Only the judges (and cops) can carry there. Lawyers have to leave their guns in the car.
There are plenty of good blacks, just like there are plenty of bad white people.
However, given their numbers and their propensity for violence and crime it doesn’t add up.
A review of the population of American prisons by race demonstrates that.
I’ve lived in the deep South all my life and I’ve observed black people up and doing the most bizarre things White people would probably never even think of doing.
And this story is a perfect example.
She’s just taking out the trash.
Much more tragic than funny. Dick, the Butcher, ("The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.") was a warning not an instruction manual.
When leftish women go goo-goo eyed over Luigi Mangione, we roll our eyes, as well we should. Rule of law is what he have instead of lynch mobs. John Adams successfully and vigorously defended the British soldiers accused in the Boston Massacre, because he felt all are entitled to vigorous representation. The lawyers in this case were representing the police department, and possibly the officers individually.
It's no laughing matter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9zy37-_0LU
You can not carry a gun in a court house unless you are a state certified police officer. That is why they screen every one coming into a court house.
Considering how difficult it is to hold anyone in government accountable for anything, this is not surprising.
The far-left retarded have turned America into the “Wild West” again with all their “F” Bombs, skanky old ladies, Molotov Cocktails, Luigis, Dipstick Court “judgies”, Presidential Assassination attempt “stagers and producers, and public school student assassinators.
oh, believe me, it is racial. Oh yes.
“The whole concept of “hate crimes” is profound BS! It’s a political weapon invented by the left to protect their filth.”
Couldn’t agree more. My guess is when someone kills another person intentionally very, very rarely it’s done out of love, so 99.99% of the time it’s a “hate crime”.
"Woman shoots two Lawyers handling Civil Lawsuit she filed against Police"
"Woman shoots two lawyers defending police in civil lawsuit she filed."
I guess I am with you.
Shakespeare spoke poorly of Cade’s Rebellion, writing as he did for his audience of Lords and Ladies who were at that time wearing the same mantles of egregious authority against which Cade rebelled, and replicating in their daily administrations the same gross injustices which the lawyers then, previously, and today consciously enable in their roles as minor functionaries of government’s grim grip on the necks of ordinary people.
Shakespeare’s audience was the middle class, but true, not the “rabble”. If you think that rule of law operates to enforce “gross injustices ... [by means of] government’s grim grip on the necks of ordinary people” today - or in the Elizabethean era, you are on the wrong site.
Rule of law, on balance was enormously beneficial to ordinary people in Elizabethean times, and far more so today.
in 1975 while working at Kansas State Pen, I asked a young Black inmate what he had learned from 5 years in prison? He told me,”Don’t leave any witnesses”.
Precursor to “The War of the Roses” but for different reasons.
You can not carry a gun in a court house unless you are a state certified police officer. That is why they screen every one coming into a court house.
When I first got to Yuma, Arizona in 1989, through about 1999, it was not illegal to carry a gun in the court-house. I did so many times.
About 1999, a chief judge instituted an anti-gun policy and the new Court house had screening by metal detectors and guards.
Now there are lock boxes inside the courthouse and outside the metal detectors where you can leave your weapons when you go into the courthouse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.