Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2026 9:20:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 05/03/2026 9:23:38 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Oil is clean energy. So are coal and wood.


4 posted on 05/03/2026 9:35:25 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We’ve been developing and refining power production in the nuclear field for decades. Thorium reactors are still being developed and refined. Their ability to answer production problems short term aren’t here. AI energy needs and wants are. One won’t solve the giant energy hole AI is making. The timing don’t jive IMO


5 posted on 05/03/2026 9:44:03 PM PDT by Equine1952 (MM1SS SASOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

A Thorium Reactor in the Middle of the Desert Has Rewritten the Rules of Nuclear Power

Move over, uranium. Get out of here, water. Thorium and salt are the new MVPs of nuclear power.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/green-tech/a64550626/thorium-reactor-nuclear-power/

6 posted on 05/03/2026 9:46:05 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Thorium was considered in the 1950s, but Uranium was pushed by the DOD because that technology meshed better with the need for nuclear weapons.

Sad.

7 posted on 05/03/2026 9:51:55 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The fuel of the future is thorium, and it is being withheld from the world because too few people know about it to demand it—and there's no reason for this ignorance. Why the secrecy?”

This statement is unvarnished balderdash. Thorium is reaching the point where it is going to be a leading nuclear power source in the not-so-distant future. Here is a summary from Gemini:

“As of **May 2026**, thorium-based reactor development has transitioned from decades of theoretical research into a high-stakes “technology race.” While uranium still dominates the commercial sector, the last 24 months have seen breakthrough milestones—most notably in China and India—that suggest thorium is finally moving toward commercial viability.


## 1. China: The Global Frontrunner
China currently holds a significant lead, having successfully moved past the experimental phase into practical “fuelization proof.”

* **TMSR-LF1 Success:** China's 2-megawatt experimental liquid-fuel thorium molten salt reactor (TMSR-LF1) in the Gobi Desert achieved full operational power in **June 2024**.
* **2026 Breakthrough:** In **April 2026**, the Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics verified “fuelization proof,” successfully demonstrating the continuous conversion of thorium into fissile Uranium-233 within a salt-based system.
* **The Roadmap:** China is now fast-tracking a **10 MW Small Modular Reactor (SMR)** targeted for 2030 and a **100 MW prototype** by 2035. They have also announced plans to use thorium reactors to power large-scale container ships, potentially allowing for years of voyage time without refueling.

## 2. India: The Three-Stage Milestone
India possesses some of the world's largest thorium reserves and has long pursued a unique three-stage nuclear program to achieve energy independence.

* **PFBR Criticality (April 2026):** On **April 6, 2026**, India's indigenously built **500 MWe Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR)** at Kalpakkam attained its first criticality.
* **The Transition:** This is a pivotal moment because the PFBR marks India's official entry into **Stage 2**. This stage is designed to use plutonium to “breed” Uranium-233 from thorium.
* **Stage 3 Goal:** This success paves the way for Stage 3, where thorium will become the primary fuel source in Advanced Heavy Water Reactors (AHWRs), with a goal of operational readiness by **2030**.


## 3. Western and Private Sector Momentum
In North America and Europe, development is largely driven by private companies and a shift toward **Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)**.

* **Copenhagen Atomics (Denmark):** They are currently preparing to test a full-scale prototype at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland (**2026–2027**), aiming for commercial units by **2030**.
* **North American Funding:** The U.S. and Canada have seen a surge in funding for next-generation designs. Companies like **Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation** are integrating thorium into micro-modular designs for remote industrial use, while **TerraPower** continues to explore thorium as a long-term supplement to their natrium-based designs.
* **Netherlands (NRG):** The Petten research reactor continues to provide critical data on how thorium fuels behave under long-term irradiation, which is essential for global licensing and safety standards.


## 4. The Thorium Cycle Explained
Unlike Uranium-235, which is “fissile” (can sustain a chain reaction immediately), thorium-232 is “fertile.” It must first absorb a neutron to become Uranium-233.

### Key Technical Comparisons (2026 Data)
| Feature | Thorium Reactors (MSR/LFTR) | Conventional Uranium (LWR) |
| :-— | :-— | :-— |
| **Abundance** | 3–4x more abundant than uranium. | Relatively finite high-grade reserves. |
| **Safety** | Passive safety; fuel is liquid and drains if power fails. | Active cooling required to prevent meltdown. |
| **Waste** | Produces significantly fewer long-lived transuranic elements. | Produces plutonium and long-lived waste. |
| **Proliferation** | Difficult to weaponize (high gamma radiation from U-232). | Plutonium byproduct can be diverted. |
| **Efficiency** | Operates at higher temperatures; higher thermal efficiency. | Lower operating temperatures; less efficient. |


## Current Challenges & Outlook
Despite the recent momentum, two main “bottlenecks” remain:

1. **Material Corrosion:** In Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs), the combination of high heat and chemically aggressive salts is hard on reactor vessels. Research in 2026 is heavily focused on **nickel-based superalloys** and specialized coatings.
2. **Regulatory Hurdles:** Most global nuclear regulations were written specifically for solid-fuel uranium reactors. Regulators in the U.S. and EU are only now beginning to create the frameworks necessary to license liquid-fuel systems.

It is certainly not being kept a secret.

**Bottom Line:** 2026 is being viewed as the “Year of Proof” for thorium. With China operating a functional loop and India starting its breeder program, the technology has moved from a “maybe” to a “when.””


11 posted on 05/03/2026 10:21:44 PM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I worked for SAIC and Leidos from 1991 to 2025. Many of my co-workers were company founders. Nuclear engineers. Not just reactors, but also the "big boom" variety. The question of thorium reactors came up about 10 years ago. I asked many of my co-workers if there was interest and expertise to build a commercial thorium reactor. The interest and expertise was certainly present. What was missing was financing and proper regulatory interface to get the project underway. There was also the reality that you can't do it with thorium alone. You must have some uranium to start it up and keep it running. That adds extra complexity and safeguards. It's now 2026. I've retired. Most of my co-workers who could have jumped on the project have retired too. I don't know if there is enough talent and expertise still in the working world to form a build team now.
19 posted on 05/03/2026 10:47:26 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I just filled out a survey in Pocatello oriented to interest in supporting the Idaho National Lab (90 miles northwest in Arco) in rolling out SMR installations. The interest scope included new businesses in Pocatello that support the SMR fabrication as well as interest in hosting an SMR in the Pocatello region. Having worked around the industry since 1991, I'm supportive of the effort. We enjoy good electrical power rates in the Pocatello area principally from hydroelectric sources. My neighbors working at "the site" AKA INL are working on the SMR devices. I may live to see that come to fruition.
21 posted on 05/03/2026 10:56:04 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Written in the same style as someone saying they invented cars that get 1000 miles per liter of water. But BIG OIL is holding them back.

Sure thorium reactors may work. But in the mean time we have plenty of cheap coal and gas.


27 posted on 05/04/2026 12:04:20 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

thorium

make skynet possible


38 posted on 05/04/2026 4:32:32 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They don’t want clean energy. They want rationed energy.


40 posted on 05/04/2026 5:21:54 AM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"The primary obstacle to replacing uranium with thorium is the immense "lock-in" effect created by the global nuclear industry’s multi-trillion-dollar investment in the uranium-based light-water reactor (LWR) infrastructure. Because the existing fleet of over 400 reactors was designed specifically for uranium fuel, transitioning to thorium would require not only the development of entirely new reactor technologies—such as Molten Salt Reactors—but also the creation of a completely new, large-scale industrial supply chain for thorium fuel fabrication and chemical processing. This economic and logistical inertia is compounded by the fact that the uranium fuel cycle is a mature, globally regulated system, whereas thorium technology lacks the commercial-scale demonstration and regulatory framework necessary to compete with the established, highly optimized uranium industry."

Source: 'Large, Stanford. Thorium as a Nuclear Fuel Source.'

42 posted on 05/04/2026 5:31:01 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

All of that may be well and true, but someobe is going to have to build the reactors for it.


43 posted on 05/04/2026 5:35:23 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What about diLithium Crystals?


52 posted on 05/04/2026 7:30:48 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Thorium is fertile not fissile.

You must bombard it with neutrons and get it to capture them and then wait for it to decay to U233 which is fissile. This means you need U235 or Pu239 as the breeder starter fuel there is no way around this fact. You could use a particle accelerator at unthinkable expense to provide said neutron flux but thorium is not fuel it is breeding material nothing more. If you at a breeding fissile isotopes there is not one better than Pu239 it is the perfect fissile isotope only Np236 has a smaller crit mass and it’s super rare. Again if you are breeding fuel Pu239 is the goal , stop being ninnies about plutonium Jane Fonda is a commie lunatic. The French, Russians and Chinese all reprocess and burn MOX and we should too. There is ten thousand years worth of U238 for breeding just sitting as UF6 in cylinders at enrichment plants as waste right now today we don’t need to mine a single gram more. We need the political will to use the technology the USA invented but Clinton shutdown the IFR it worked flawlessly.

U233 is easier to chemically vs isotopic separate from thorium vs U235 is from U238 or Pu239 from spent fuel.

U233 is all bomb grade from the start unlike U239 which will always have Pu240/241 in reactor spent fuel. It’s never bomb grade. You need dedicated weapons reactors with very short irradiation cycles to make weapons grade Pu , thorium breeders do it as par for the course.

We don’t need new tech we need to have some Fing balls and make IFR reactors at scale.

I have friends and alumni working at Aalo in Austin they are the ones doing sodium cooled reactors for AI centers right now they have a working reactor at the National lab expected to go first crit on July 4th as part of the DOE renaissance program. They fully expect to burn Pu239 in the near future they chose sodium cooling specifically to be able to switch to the fast spectrum as soon as the USA grows a pair of balls.


59 posted on 05/04/2026 8:18:09 AM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

We spend billions on the development of batteries that have with even future technology only a slim chance of being able to store enough energy to light a small city let alone power an AI center. This research is being funded to fix the problem of so called renewable sources that don’t generate any power when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing. Perhaps it is time to look at thorium


60 posted on 05/04/2026 8:25:40 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I often wonder why someone like Elon Musk doesn't turn his attention and evident genius to developing solutions to energy production and infrastructure. Mars isn't going anywhere. And he seems to be hugely underestimating (understating) the actual difficulties and dangers in sending humans (radiation and temperature sensitive air, water, and food dependent bags of meat and feces) there and back alive.

Maybe we can practice for Mars by first colonizing Antarctica or the Continental Shelf. Sort out dealing with Martian like temperatures/lack of breathable air first. And work on safe, economical, and relatively clean nuclear energy as an existential priority.

67 posted on 05/04/2026 9:44:16 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You have never dealt with a treehugger, have you? Not only are they more stupid than a turnip, they just refuse to listen. No better than the hired thugs rioting in the street against ICE.

Simple Uranium will supply us for thousands of years, but no treehugger will let that happen.


69 posted on 05/04/2026 11:27:03 AM PDT by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson