Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: DOJ Drops Criminal Investigation into Fed Chair Powell
thegatewaypundit.com ^ | Apr. 24, 2026 | Cristina Laila

Posted on 04/24/2026 8:11:22 AM PDT by V_TWIN

The Justice Department on Friday dropped its criminal investigation into Fed Chairman Jerome Powell.

This clears the way for Trump’s Fed Chair nominee Kevin Warsh to be confirmed.

Senator Thom Tillis vowed to block Trump’s Fed Chair confirmation until the Justice Department dropped its investigation into Powell.

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro made the announcement on Friday morning:

"This morning the Inspector General for the Federal Reserve has been asked to scrutinize the building costs overruns – in the billions of dollars – that have been borne by taxpayers.

The IG has the authority to hold the Federal Reserve accountable to American taxpayers. I expect a comprehensive report in short order and am confident the outcome will assist in resolving, once and for all, the questions that led this office to issue subpoenas.

Accordingly, I have directed my office to close our investigation as the IG undertakes this inquiry. Note well, however, that I will not hesitate to restart a criminal investigation should the facts warrant doing so."

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: cristinalaila; doj; fedchair; gatewaypundit; inflation; powell
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: V_TWIN

I love it that the media is now using derivatives of “drop” to actually mean what they say, rather than using this verb to mean just the opposite! The way they change common words to negate their actual meaning is very confusing! You would think that journalism school would teach them not to do this.


21 posted on 04/24/2026 9:25:53 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More (Things are fraying my nerves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

I saw that. I don’t believe they would actually drop it off they thought they had a good case, but we’ll see. I think the President tends to push political prosecutions that lack legal merit.


22 posted on 04/24/2026 10:36:40 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Tillis wins - Warsh will be confirmed.


23 posted on 04/24/2026 10:55:55 AM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Agree. But, I still don’t understand why Tillis was so adamant about not investigating Powell. Wonder why he is protecting him?


24 posted on 04/24/2026 10:56:01 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

This.


25 posted on 04/24/2026 10:57:24 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Not necessarily. It will be looked into instead by the Inspector General. A billion plus for that building is very suspicious.


26 posted on 04/24/2026 10:58:55 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

The question is what/who is Tillis covering for?


27 posted on 04/24/2026 11:00:17 AM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN
For anyone wondering what politics is.....this is it.

Yeah, well I for one am tired of it.

I propose KING TRUMP and the senate and representatives disbanded. They're useless.

No one in Washington is representing ME (even though I constantly tell them what I want them to do), so what's "representative" about it?

28 posted on 04/24/2026 11:23:47 AM PDT by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivenne
A billion plus for that building is very suspicious.
29 posted on 04/24/2026 12:02:28 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

Who says he is covering for anyone? He’s not allowed to think independently??


30 posted on 04/24/2026 12:34:50 PM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

Tillis has a lot of skeletons in his closet. He is a RINO on steroids.


31 posted on 04/24/2026 12:36:34 PM PDT by kabar ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

IGs, AGs and the GAO are useless wastes of money.

They accomplish nothing.


32 posted on 04/24/2026 12:38:48 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Really? An independent thinker? Why would Tillis care if there is a criminal probe into potential wrong doing and why would you defend his strong opposition to it???


33 posted on 04/24/2026 12:55:46 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kabar

His very vocal objections scream defensive moves so skeletons/closets make sense. Wish I knew more about them....


34 posted on 04/24/2026 12:58:26 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

“Really? An independent thinker? Why would Tillis care if there is a criminal probe into potential wrong doing and why would you defend his strong opposition to it???”

“Criminal probe”??? On cost overruns at a federal project??? And an allegation that someone testifying to congress about it “lied”? How often do members of Congress lie in their own testimonies (speeches) in Congressional “investigations” , every day, and never get prosecuted for “perjury”.

O.K. Powell (whom Trump appointed to the Fed) has not been a stellar Fed Chairman, and Trump feels his advisors advised him badly in choosing Powell, and Trump would like lower interest rates than Powell has achieved. “Criminal probe”??

No. Trump wanted Powell out sooner, and that’s it, period.

Tillis was right, drop the stupid “investigation” and get Trump’s new fed appointee confirmed, and move on.

It has nothing to do with Tillis being in anyone’s pocket.


35 posted on 04/24/2026 1:16:54 PM PDT by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“Drop the investigation.

Get your new guy confirmed.

Restart the investigation.

Rinse and repeat.”
____________________________________________________________

If it was dropped in the “furtherance of justice,” the indictments can’t be brought before a Grand Jury again. I’d also bet that the court dismissed the indictment “with prejudice,” which also forecloses future charges.

Even if Trump’s guy is confirmed, Powell doesn’t have to leave the Board of Governors, and the Chairman is just one vote out of 12.


36 posted on 04/24/2026 1:51:29 PM PDT by Bob Wills is still the king
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king

There is no indictment. There was never going to be indictments. The whole, manufactured mess was lawfare at its worse. Everyone in Washington, including the dim Tillis, knows it. Move on.


37 posted on 04/24/2026 1:59:03 PM PDT by Oystir ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bob Wills is still the king; piytar
If it was dropped in the “furtherance of justice,” the indictments can’t be brought before a Grand Jury again. I’d also bet that the court dismissed the indictment “with prejudice,” which also forecloses future charges.

Both statements are too absolute and usually wrong in practice.

Dismissal “in the furtherance (or interest) of justice” is a discretionary decision by the court—basically: continuing the case would be unfair or not serve justice. By itself, that phrase does NOT determine whether charges can come back. The key question is with or without prejudice, not “furtherance of justice.”

Dismissed with prejudice = final, Prosecutors cannot refile the same charges.It’s treated as a final adjudication (similar effect to a not-guilty outcome for that charge).

BUT—two important caveats: Caveat A: It must actually be “with prejudice”. Courts do not default to this—it’s relatively rare. Prosecutors themselves usually seek without prejudice if they want flexibility.

Caveat B: Scope matters. “With prejudice” bars the same charges based on the same facts. It doesn’t always prevent: Different charges based on different facts, or charges from a different sovereign (e.g., state vs federal)

Nor is there any public indication that the charges were dismissed with prejudice. In fact, I'm unaware that the DOJ made any pitch to a Grand Jury or a court at all. An internally-sponsored investigation could be turned on or off at will.

I thought you had some legal background?

38 posted on 04/24/2026 2:08:26 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The quickest and easiest way to untold riches is to be elected to national office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Sorry, but I want an investigation into why it’s costing over a billion dollars to renovate a Federal building. Trump knows, and so do I, that there is something very wrong with that number and it would point to monkey business in the construction process. Very common generally in the business but this situation is beyond believable on the surface. Any improprieties need to be prosecuted.


39 posted on 04/24/2026 2:15:53 PM PDT by vivenne (7Come to think of it. Fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz drops the hammer. Well done sir.


40 posted on 04/24/2026 2:48:59 PM PDT by piytar (NEVER FORGET Ashli Babbitt, Rosanne Boyland, Corey Comperatore, Iryna Zarutska, and Charlie Kirk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson