Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Show me the Law" (To File for Income Tax)
X ^ | 23 March | Dinesh D'Souza

Posted on 03/23/2026 5:41:55 AM PDT by RandFan

@DineshDSouza

He hasn’t paid income tax in over 30 years and claims he hasn’t gone to jail because Americans are not legally required to file…..

@PeterSchiff

My father also said, “Show me the law.” He coined the term “confession” to describe the 1040. Though the government never showed him any law that required him to pay income taxes or file an income tax confession, corrupt judges orchestrated convictions to protect the government.

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: dinetteisuzu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: RandFan

“””””Yes. The judiciary will back-up the government
That’s the issue.”””””

Post 30 asked you “Have you ever filed income taxes in this country, or been required to?”

That seems relevant to your thread.


41 posted on 03/23/2026 9:06:48 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain; unixfox; RandFan

I remember this subject came up 15-20 years ago on
FR, seems Minnesota never voted to approve the 16th
yet the powers that be went ahead with taxes anyways.

One half of 1 percent if you made over $20k about
110 years ago or so iirc.


42 posted on 03/23/2026 9:59:18 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels ("And We Know - all things work for good to them who love God, called according to his purposes." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

In Law, definitions mean something. Those who state that they are not required to comply are technically correct, like Germans who were not technically required to support Hitler. If they didn’t, the Law had them put down. The Law has been outside its proscribed limitations for over a Century now, that doesn’t make it right.


43 posted on 03/23/2026 11:57:32 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

It is in the definition of income that is the problem. Wages are not income. It is a barter with an employer. Now the employer takes an idea, turns a profit. An employee makes no profit.


44 posted on 03/23/2026 12:00:38 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts

Wages are literally income. Income is money that comes to you.


45 posted on 03/23/2026 12:02:48 PM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

So a businessman invests money, makes a business, has an income from it. He gets to deduct the cost of the buildings, the facilities, transportation, and write off the wear and tear on machinery. This man is deducts all before profit.

A man goes to work, everything he is paid, is considered income. In short, the equipment which is his skill, mind and body are non deductible, although they are finite. He is chattel. Wages are not income, it is a straight trade for value. Like purchasing his time. This is time he can never get back no matter how long he lives.


46 posted on 03/23/2026 8:27:11 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson