Posted on 03/21/2026 3:57:47 AM PDT by McGruff
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard fully intends to remain in her position despite rumors that she is planning to resign from President Donald Trump's administration in protest of the Iran war.
Right-wing activist Laura Loomer announced on social media Thursday evening that Gabbard was preparing to resign, citing a member of the director's political staff as a source. She advocated that President Trump fire Gabbard before she could resign.
But a senior administration official told the Daily Mail that Loomer’s claim was ‘total bull****.’
A spokesperson for the Director of National Intelligence also pushed back against the online rumors.
‘Any claims the Director is resigning are false,’ a spokesperson told the Daily Mail. ‘She is committed to fulfilling the responsibilities the President placed in her to protect the safety, security, and freedom of the American people.’
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
It’s hard to know what Trump believes anymore.
A conversation with duckai.com indicates Loomer the doomer is full of it:
Is there any substance to rumors that Tulsi Gabbard might resign?
Short answer: No confirmed evidence she plans to resign.
What’s publicly known (as of March 21, 2026):
A senior counterterrorism official (Joe Kent) resigned March 17 in protest over the Iran war; that prompted speculation about Tulsi Gabbard’s future.
Gabbard issued a public statement supporting the president’s authority to judge imminent threats and testified before Congress; White House officials say the president has confidence in her.
Major news outlets (NBC, Yahoo, Daily Beast, regional papers) report scrutiny and social-media rumors but cite no credible reporting or official statement that Gabbard intends to resign.
Bottom line: rumors are unconfirmed; rely on an explicit statement from Gabbard, the White House, or a named, credible report before treating them as fact.
This rumor comes from Laura Loomer who supposedly is right 9 out of 10 times regarding her predictions. Is she typically that accurate in her predictions, even though there is no significant evidence to support her current claim regarding Gabbard?
Short answer: No — independent checks don’t support a “9 out of 10” accuracy claim.
Evidence:
Major fact‑checkers and news outlets (PolitiFact, BBC, AP and others) have repeatedly flagged many of Loomer’s high‑profile claims as false, misleading, or unsubstantiated.
Her influence comes from proximity to certain political figures and viral posts, not a documented, consistent hit‑rate in verifiable predictions.
Public prediction markets or accountability trackers don’t show a verified 90% success rate for Loomer’s claims; when measurable claims are checked, many have failed.
Bottom line: Treat Loomer’s “9/10” accuracy claim skeptically and look for independent, named sourcing before trusting predictive assertions.
Know what to believe.
Loomer’s claim was ‘total bull****
Well I like to listen to what he actually says instead of what everyone else and the media speculates he’s thinking.
I would say she gets it right 75% of the time. The other 25% of the time she gets it terribly wrong.
Everyone is only as correct or incorrect as their sources.
Without knowing the sources it is kinda hard to figure out what is happening.
Then add the fog of war when propaganda increases tenfold and everything is a mystery inside an enigma.
Loomer is a rabid Zionist kook...which might explain why some here take him seriously.
Like this?
With Loomer, well you know.
https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1752010577084313763
Maybe ole Nikki was one step ahead of the esteemed, always honest Loomer. LOL /sarc
Your observation is I believe is totally, 1000% correct.
They (The Deep State) have nothing else to fight with. At CNN Trump with MAGA base is at an unheard of 100% approval rate. With the midterms fast approaching, its imperative they cut into this number. Therefore one way to combat in their depleted arsenal is to up the negative stories and activate more of their Joe Kents.
Note: When I write Deep State, that umbrella covers Dems, RINOS and those life long State Department employees still hiding like cockroaches in the shadows.
If it comes from the Has Been Media it is very, very, suspect from the get-go. See Tagline.
Egad. I am losing count of how many times I have seen on this one thread the equivalent of “Laura Loomer said it so it is the truth!”
SMH.
It doesn’t speak well for Trump that Loomer the psycho has such deep access to he and his White House.
I never thought Gabbard was a good pick. Trump should already have fired her when she hired back that guy Hegseth fired for leaking. Now we have that backstabbing drone Kent that she put in charge of an intelligence think tank running around trying to undermine Trump.
Laura Loomer is a narcissistic, sensationalist whack job.
.........................................................
100%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.