Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/13/2026 9:21:47 AM PDT by WhiteHatBobby0701
A Quiet Coastal Revolution
“Why only two?”
The question, posed six years ago by J.T. Scott, a member of the city council of Somerville, Massachusetts, is at the heart of the debate concerning government recognition of polyamory.
Scott and his colleague on the city council were considering a domestic partnership ordinance. The original language of the draft specified a domestic partnership as being “between two people,” according to The Harvard Crimson.
Councilor Lance L. Davis paused, saying “something didn’t feel quite right,” reports The Crimson. Scott asked the question: “Why only two?”
Davis, in his words, executed a “few simple tweaks,” altering the ordinance to permit groups of more than two adults to register in domestic partnerships together. The city council voted 11-0 to pass the ordinance.
It was signed by then-Mayor Joe Curtatone on June 29, 2020, becoming the first “multiple-partner domestic partnership ordinance” in the United States, according to the Harvard Law Review.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Spiritual decline, moral decay.
“Why only two?”
Because the Bible tells me so.
And for me, thats all I need to know.
♬Life would be ecstasy, you and me, and Leslie....Groovin’.....♬
These people are going to wind up so miserable, they’ll give the experiment up pretty quickly.
islam.
I see this creating all kinds of complexity for property and child custody. Nothing good can come from it.
I wouldn’t support it anywhere, but I will say that in another culture (Islam) things gets smoothed out by the concept of “The man is always right / no one cares what the woman thinks”. That helpful bit of guidance will never fly in the US and so our legal system will be tied in knots trying to split things which cannot be neatly split.
Predicted this would happen if they allowed for same sex marriage.
“Noooo bigot, marriage is only between two people.”
Pedophilia isn’t far behind this and that just leaves marriage with animals and all my predictions will come true.
Unfortunately true
This all began in Seattle-Portland area about 20 years ago.
Portland had very few good paying jobs and women quickly found out if they had two BF, it was easier to afford a nice place.
I had a very close friend who was trying this out for exactly this reason.
After a couple years it just got way too creepy for her.
She is now VERY happily married to one guy living in eastern Oregon.
I always wondered 🤔🤔🤔 about that song
This is bad for children.
The sins of the fathers will visit the offspring down to the 3rd or 4th generations.
Thinking about it, if one partner gets any infectious disease, they might all get it. If one partner is unfaithful sexually to the group do they get kicked out? How do they live together knowing there is someone in the group who could be possibly plotting against the other two?
If men murder their wives in single couple marriages, or women murder their husbands, what could happen with multiple partners.
Difficult enough to keep 2 together, keeping 3 together is much harder. Expect trend to die, when people start being severely damaged, or even murdered due to dynamics of their relationships.
Enjoy the future.
Just read Genisis chapter 19.
These people think they’re doing something original....depraved behavior such as thishas been going on fore.
Because as one ages, two ugly horny bats in the house who need a good @$%)(!!! to keep them quiet are a PITA.
who’s the sucker the married the pig?
islam and mormons, both created with immoral behaviors of sex with children and multiple women.
Gosh, who could have seen that coming... /sarc
Death spiral culture. To them, Islam or some other dictatorship will bring iron fisted clarity, and stability.
Actually, after Ogberfell, I predicted this would be the immediate next step. Who knew the Transoids would jump to the front of the line?
But now, a certain Religion of Peace cannot be offended in any way, hence the new legal reasoning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.