Posted on 02/07/2026 8:44:00 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Historians never tire of analyzing the fall of Rome. There were many causes, but an oft-neglected one is the corruption of the Roman family and the related population collapse that occurred in the centuries before the empire’s fall.
Rome’s original greatness depended in part on its commitment to family. A classic Roman virtue extolled in the quintessential Roman poem the “Aeneid,”—was “pietas” or “piety.” This term referred to deep devotedness to one’s family, particularly one’s parents, as well as gods and country. Early Romans valued marriage, fidelity, honor, and looked down on self-indulgence. Their successes must be attributed, at least partially, to these virtues.
In contrast, Rome’s decline occurred in parallel with its abandonment of these values. As Jerome Carcopino explained in “Daily Life in Ancient Rome,” divorces were rare in the time of the Roman republic, but happened constantly in the latter stages of the empire. An epidemic of divorces undermined the stability of the Roman family and tore apart the fabric of society. “In the city as at the court,” Carcopino wrote, “the ephemeral households of Rome were perpetually being disrupted, or rather were continually dissolving to recrystallize and dissolve again till age and death finally overtook them.”
The Roman poet Marcus Valerius Martialis (Martial) said divorces and remarriages were so frequent that marriage had little meaning, becoming practically a form of legal adultery or prostitution. The separations occurred on the frailest of pretexts, too: He’s old; she’s got some wrinkles; he’s sick; she forgot to wear her veil in public.
Late marriages and small families became the rule, and men satisfied their sexual instincts by homosexuality or by relations with slaves and prostitutes.”
Men weren’t the only ones running from responsibility, either. Carcopino relates that many Roman women avoided motherhood simply out of fear of losing their looks.
When couples did marry, they often had few, if any, children. “Whether because of voluntary birth control, or because of the impoverishment of the stock, many Roman marriages at the end of the first and the beginning of the second century were childless,” Carcopino noted. Roman couples made use of contraceptives and abortions. If that failed, they didn’t hesitate to kill their infants by abandoning them and exposing them to the elements.
The natural consequence of all this was, of course, low birth rates and population decline. The trend became alarming enough that the emperor Augustus tried to provide incentives for couples to have more children, but it was too late to reverse the problem.
As Romans chose not to reproduce, the population of Rome inevitably began to shrink. This process was accelerated by disease and invasion. Between the second and sixth centuries AD, Rome’s population went from a healthy 1 million to a mere 30,000.
Dawson attributed Rome’s overall decline largely to low birth rates and the collapse of marriage:
“This aversion to marriage and the deliberate restriction of the family by the practice of infanticide and abortion was undoubtedly the main cause of the decline of ancient Greece, as Polybius pointed out in the second century B.C. And the same factors were equally powerful in the society of the [Roman] Empire, where the citizen class even in the provinces was extraordinarily sterile and was recruited not by natural increase, but by the constant introduction of alien elements, above all from the servile class. Thus the ancient world lost its roots alike in the family and in the land and became prematurely withered.”
Rome’s internal weakness—beginning with the weakness of its families—made it susceptible to eventual invasions.
What are the implications of all this for us? It takes just a little reflection to reveal the parallels between our current-day situation and the situation of the Romans in late antiquity. We share many traits with the Romans: an emphasis on sexual freedom outside of marriage, a tendency toward late marriages, a penchant for divorce, disdain for large families, and an inclination to use contraception and abortion. All this has placed us in the same situation of staring down a population collapse, the consequences of which we’re still coming to terms with.
It would be fatalistic and poor history to claim that modern Western civilization will follow the same path as the Romans simply because we share some similarities. Still, Rome’s story should be a cautionary tale. We need to relearn—and soon—what we and they forgot: The stability and success of a society begins with the stability and success of its families, which form its most basic unit.
Furthermore, a society that has lost its love of children and abandoned its understanding of the sacredness of marriage has become, in a sense, suicidal. Its days are numbered unless it changes course.
“Monogamous and indissoluble marriage has been the foundation of European society and has conditioned the whole development of our civilization,” Dawson wrote. We neglect this societal cornerstone at our peril.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
I once read an article where the author (an historian) argued that the main reason Rome fell was arrogance. Rome was great, and eternal. It simply could not fall. So why take any corrective measures? Why be concerned?
I kind of think that the United States is in that position day.
Anyone who denies that Western Civilization is committing demographic suicide is either lying or not paying attention. BUT it’s also undeniable that the folks on the political left within that society are generally doing worse in this regard than folks on the right. So the silver lining is that when things hit rock bottom, the left will be a spent force and perhaps the right be can rebuild based on Christianity. Heck, that’s what happened with the Roman Empire.
Read Cicero. He was remarkably prescient. He predicted that when the simple virtues or pietas of the Republic were no longer held by the people, Rome would not be conquered but would rot from within. John Adams came to the same conclusion regarding the American Republic. Character has always been at the core of any successful civilization. Historically the avid embrace of neo pagan, hedonistic decadence ( a perverse permutation of epicureanism) has been a constant of every collapse. Our time is no different.
Did any romans of antiquity call for open borders?
“The Ancient City,” by Numa Denis Fustel de Coulanges, is essential reading. He describes the founding culture of the ancient Romans, how they regarded family, property, the gods, the dead.
It’s free online, and an audiobook is on youtube.
Roman citizenship was until the latter stages of the empire not easily obtained or granted. However if people from conquered lands wanted to travel or settle throughout the empire they could. But make no mistake. Unless they were productive, they starved and withered. There was no welfare or charity to them. Economic realities defined borders. Today nobody who crosses into the EU or the US starves or freezes to death.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.