Posted on 12/09/2025 5:04:45 AM PST by MtnClimber
The US has released a new National Security Strategy which re-envisions the Monroe Doctrine for a new century. Bernhard at MoA covered it in full here for those interested in the thorough details. I’ll instead look at the bigger picture, as well as one specific, fascinating aspect of this major rethink of US foreign policy.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/06/world/europe/trump-europe-strategy-document.html
NYT’s subheading reframes the new vision as a hatred for Europe:
A new White House policy document formalizes President Trump’s long-held contempt for Europe’s leaders. It made clear that the continent now stands at a strategic crossroads.
Well, why wouldn’t Trump hate the new Europe? It’s a continent that has turned its back on civil liberties, the principles for which America itself was supposed to stand first and foremost.
It accused the European Union of stifling “political liberty,” warned that some NATO members risked becoming “majority non-European,” and said the U.S. should align with “patriotic European parties” — code for Europe’s far-right movements.
Most interesting in the above is the mention of one particular aspect of Trump’s new document, which essentially reframes US’s waning support for Europe as a backlash against Europe’s continued policy of erasure of its own peoples and cultures.
A different NYT article focused entirely on this:
The Trump administration said on Friday that Europe was facing the “stark prospect of civilizational erasure” and pledged that the United States would support like-minded “patriotic” parties across the continent to prevent a future in which “certain NATO members will become majority non-European.”
Others covered this most intriguing of angles directly as well, here the National Pulse:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/12/05/trump-admin-fears-nato-allies-will-become-disloyal-partners-as-mass-migration-turns-them-majority-non-european/
And why wouldn’t that be a legitimate security concern for the US? When the demographics of your chief allies completely revert to a people with understandably questionable loyalties to the very security architectures which underpin your key alliance—well, that becomes quite a tangible problem.
Here are the exact relevant passages from the new Trump NSS—read the bolded carefully:
- Page 25: “The larger issues facing Europe include activities of the European Union and other transnational bodies that undermine political liberty and sovereignty, migration policies that are transforming the continent and creating strife, censorship of free speech and suppression of political opposition, cratering birthrates, and loss of national identities and self-confidence. Should present trends continue, the continent will be unrecognizable in 20 years or less. As such, it is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies.”
- Page 27: “Over the long term, it is more than plausible that within a few decades at the latest, certain NATO members will become majority non-European. As such, it is an open question whether they will view their place in the world, or their alliance with the United States, in the same way as those who signed the NATO charter.”<.i>
The point is so significant, let’s run it again: “As such, it is far from obvious whether certain European countries will have economies and militaries strong enough to remain reliable allies…As such, it is an open question whether they will view their place in the world, or their alliance with the United States, in the same way as those who signed the NATO charter.”
To repeat: Isn’t that a genuine concern? When your very own allies have shifted their core demographic to the point that you must worry about the civic, social, and cultural underpinning of the agreements with those very allies, it’s time to rethink relevant strategic alliances you have with them.
This has long been a growing concern in the West, ever since the globalist migration social engineering wave had begun peaking and reshaping the social fabric of Western nations.
In the US in particular, this was highlighted in the early 2000s in a kind of cult-essay written by Stephen Steinlight, called “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography”.
In the essay, Jewish writer Steinlight makes a similar argument, but from the perspective of Jewish influence in the US. His argument is that the mass migration sweeping through the US will eventually alter the demographics of the nation to such an extent that it will pose a serious threat to Jewish-American ‘special interests’, given that the predominantly Latin-American and Muslim immigrants will lack the same inculcated sense of respect for Jewish values and guilt for the Holocaust that native-born Americans possess.......SNIP
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
It seems that President Trump is letting Europe know that he thinks they are finished.
They ARE finished. There is no way they will expel all those muslim invaders. The invaders will displace the natives in very short order. The EU doesn’t have the nerve to turn it around. Someone might call them racist.
As usual, the New York Homosexual Times takes the side of the globalist EuroTrash, the Jew haters and the Muslim Jihadi’s.
Europe is no longer Western. It has been taken over by the barbarian Islamic hordes. And it’s exxactly what the Homosexual Times wants to happen to the USA.
Much like a good friend being brutally honest, President Trump is telling them what they need to hear. I doubt they will listen, and the part of the world many of us have ancestral roots within will be adversely affected.
Those in Europe speaking out and trying to effect change need amplification and support. They may be a silent majority, Europe’s best hope to return to normal. European countries need their own version of President Trump. Someone to rationally, unapologetically, and systematically dismantle failed policies. Someone charismatic that gain swift gain momentum.
Two pertinent statements. Europe is suffering a collapse that began in slow-motion but is rapidly accelerating.
America is also at this moment faced with unpleasant issues, whether it wants to be or not.
More directly, the HT is simply part of a mouthpiece for the new, obviously infiltrated and aggressive anti-MAGA Dem party.
We'll just watch Europe disappear from a safe distance...
In 1970 non-Hispanic whites made up 90% of the U.S. population; today it is 63%; and by 2043 at the latest it will be 50%. Almost 90% of the 1.1 million LEGAL immigrants we bring in annually are minorities as defined by the USG. We are headed down the same path as Europe.
“Almost 90% of the 1.1 million LEGAL immigrants we bring in annually are minorities as defined by the USG”
So, when whites become the minority do they get to hold sway like current “minorities”? Asking for a friend.
This is good. The EU is finished.
With present mass migration, the nukes of the EU countries will be in enemy hands.
Time to restrict legal immigration to those who embrace American values, bring value, and are willing to join the culture - not radically change it.
He ain’t wrong.
Actually it has been done before, but I doubt they have the balls to do what has to be done to achieve it.
Whites are already a minority of the world population. Only 8% of the world is white and they are taking that from us also. Don’t tell me that it isn’t a planned extermination of us?
They pretty much are finished. The EU is a failed enterprise that is destroying western Europe. We need to get out of NATO and it looks like Trump is moving that way.
Time for a moratorium on legal immigration.
Many EU Countries have been actively hostile toward the US in general and any Trump policies in particular. = not a good Ally.
Several EU (5 eyes) intelligence agencies have attempted to support a political coup against Trump. = not a good Ally.
When Trump tried to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons, what did the majority of the EU countries do? Did they support limiting Iran nuclear weapons progress with military action or did they opt for strongly worded letters and speeches? = not a good Ally.
In the whole Gaza/Palestinian/Hamas October 7th attack on women, children, and in general civilians in villages and at a music concert, did the various European Countries allow/encourage pro-Palestinian protests or did the Countries side with Israel and its right to attack those who killed their people? Trump, quickly and firmly sided with Israel. European countries, not so much.
Don't get me started on the various “no-go zones” in France, and many Scandinavian Countries, or the Sharia courts in the UK and other portions of European countries.
What I don’t get is the explosion (pun intended) of the Muslim population here. In some places Blacks were the majority (where I live), other places Whites, other places Hispanic.
But at least here there’s been a massive increase in Muslims and Hindus such that in some elementary schools there’s just a token White or Black kid, all the others from other countries.
I have read that sharia courts are in the US.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.