Posted on 12/03/2025 6:41:21 PM PST by ransomnote
Two minute video interview at the link:
Wide Awake Media
@wideawake_media
·
Dec 2
The Club of Rome's Dennis Meadows hopes the human population can be reduced down to one billion people—an 88% reduction from today’s population—"in a civil way". 🙄"The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have."
"If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people."
"And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship."
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Start with him.
That’s only fair, and I am sure the family would be glad to be a part of helping make the old man’s dream real.
SHADES OF “EARTH FIRST” & DAVE FOREMAN-—1980
I have yet to hear these big-mouthed pinheads demonstrate that they understand exactly how very many humans are needed to maintain and advance our technological base. The fact they make these grandiose pronouncements shows they don’t understand and they’re pulling these numbers our of the air.
Not to mention Ira Einhorn, who reduced the population when he murdered his beautiful girlfriend Holly Maddox in West Philadelphia.
Good point by Musk, but he’s also pointed out the problem of AI sucking up many jobs. I’ll get back to that in a moment.*
An interesting case can be made by examining Israel. Israel does not naturally have an environment conducive to a high density human population. Yet, it’s population density is over 10x that of the USA, and it does well (and very much encourages making babies), and it’s most definitely NOT any sort of dictatorship, even though it is under considerable threat(s). Technology and sensible decisions can get you a long way. (Perhaps Israel’s most sensible decisions have been those regarding their water supply.)
Israel HAS swung recently into a negative balance of trade, but for reasons that appear to be mostly external-political. Outside of those, there appears to be no reason Israel could not swing back to a positive trade balance.
The converse of Israel is Iran, which is also arid, is far more blessed with natural resources, and has a population density just over 1/8th of Israel’s. But... they have been idiots, and now face a staggering water crisis. Their fertility rate has also dramatically crashed, and had fallen to only 1.44 before this water crisis really began to bite.
On a planetary scale, because resources are not distributed evenly, you HAVE to have high volumes of international trade, to maintain a large population in at least halfway decent living conditions. So, those who go by the biblical adage “go forth and multiply” need to tack on “trade, but fairly” and perhaps even Rodney King’s “can’t we all just get along”.
*Several days ago, I observed as a road repair crew repaired some broken up asphalt pavement near my house. I also have some background, which ended a few years ago, with capabilities of AI robots in industrial production. (I’ve done some production engineering, but am not myself an AI developer.) Anyway, I couldn’t help but think the entire job could be done by advanced AI robots, perhaps with a human supervisor to address anything the programmers could not foresee.
Don't agree with you there. There are scads of ranchers, hunters, fishermen, foresters, and even heavy equipment operators who are passionate about what they do on the land. One could call them environmental zealots. Certainly what I do would fit. But at the same time I'm taking to task the people to whom you clearly do refer. The key difference between the two is that most of the former recognize the need for management, while the latter think unattended "Nature" is self optimizing. Little do they realize that a world operating under "survival of the fittest" necessarily results in planetary death. Darwin was wrong in generalizing a special case beyond its useful limits.
Good points.
Speaking of people crops, all them people would suppy a lot of
Soylent Green and Soylent Brown.
Why waste good crops?
I’m sure Satan is very proud of his little boy.
G.K. Chesterton
The Club of Rome’s reasoning may be based on how many of the ‘elite’ will be optimal for their maximum happiness. Then you just determine how many slaves are needed to support their lifestyle. That’s how these people think.
Fine, let’s start with him.
He’s singing the song of his people - “Lebensraum!”
Of course the elites suggesting this will be among the living.
I thought they wanted 100 million.
You go first buddy, show us how it's done. You believe we will follow you right........
Snicker, giggle, guffaw, full on belly laugh!!!!!!
It’ll be interesting to learn how they will determine who will be the slaves and how they’ll corral them. My guess is they’ll make sure the group is from their own class/caste, but then convince them that their “knowledge” and “expertise” as “doers” will make them… “essential”…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.