Tuco got it right.
>
Posted on 11/25/2025 11:55:38 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Tuco got it right.
>
Yes!
“ but Mark Kelly has not crossed any lines as far as I can determine.”
It ain’t up to you, Scooter.
L
Enough of threats.
gotta say..ive never seen the democrats so rattled by this..they are freaking out. Kelly stepped in it and he knows it.
Who is this Pentagon?
It would be a leaker.
I thought Kelly was a pilot. He was not a JAG, so he has no business ‘advising’ military personnel about orders from the Commander in Chief. If a person in the Military believes that an illegal order has been issued, then he can bring it up with the JAG, but he better be right. Captain Kelly believes that he is better suited to render legal advice than JAG. For that, he must pay consequences for his actions.
“the former astronaut and decorated veteran.” and a slimy corrupt politician!
This should be done and put on pay per view. Give the people an education on how military tribunals work.
The JAG’s real job is to protect the Commander. Average Soldiers can’t even get the time of day from them.
There are only lawful and unlawful orders. Encouraging military members to substitute their own judgement or bias is mutinous/seditious etc. Sad part, except for this ahole the guys going down would be the fools that listened to this group. I’m sure they will be available to console the NoKs.
The you have had your head up your ass.
Set an example with this low rent a$$hole.
He didn’t say he would, he urged current military members to disobey illegal orders, without saying anything about what will happen to anybody who disobeys an order: in order to be acquitted by a court-martial, the Accused would have to prove that the order was illegal - a very high bar. The statement itself is just a restatement of the requirement to obey even orders with which we disagree, but it’s dangerous for the members who are likely to substitute their judgment for that of their superior officers.
Colonel, USAF JAGC (Ret)
I’m going to cite a couple examples where judgment was used.
At abu graib a dog handler was ordered to use his dog to intimidate the prisoners and he refused.
Some of lieutenant calley’s soldiers refused his orders and threats or court martial
I don’t know what training you had but I completed officer training
CANCEL HIS PENSION,ALSO
HIS MOUTH ALWAYS SEEMS AHEAD OF HIS BRAINS.
Both of those things took great courage but were also completely supportable. When they’re encouraged to second-guess orders that they think are subject to interpretation, it endangers them and their unit (hesitation is deadly).
HE IS NAVY-—A CAPTAIN-—SEND HIM OUT TO TAKE OUT THOSE DRUG BOATS.
MAYBE HE WILL GET AN EDUCATION
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.