[escapefromboston]

I was hoping for another 1000 threads about this important issue.

[Kleon]

"After listening to a compilation of some of the “worst things” Fuentes has said, Johnson called it “vile, terrible stuff.”

So he heard some cherry picked, out of context comments and decided he was "terrible"?

[mitchjackson1972]

it was terrible for establishment

[jacknhoo]

There’s nothing good to be said about Fuentes.

[alternatives?]

I don’t want politicians controlling podcaster’s guest list.

[BigJimSportCamper]

Johnson is merely echoing what his AIPAC handlers told him.
Carlson can have anyone he wants on is show. TFB.

[pas]

Remember when the media went nuts on far leftists being interviewed. Me either.

[Mr. N. Wolfe]

Speaker Mike Johnson bent over backwards for the Biden regime prior to Trump’s reelection. I expect that he’ll do it again if the Democrats retake the executive branch.

Mike Johnson is a spineless weasel.

[cowboyusa]

It’s an opinion. thers have different opinions. Can

[cowboyusa]

Neither one should ne canceled. Let everyone see them for the idiots they are.

[nonliberal]

Johnson is no the arbiter of who Tucker can and can’t interview. Now, is Fuentes a complete retard, yes. But if Tucker wants to interview him, that’s only up to Tucker.

[Kazan]

So, Johnson is upset that Carlson told Fuentes that it was wrong to judge Jews or any other group by their DNA and as a whole rather than as individuals?

Carlson: "By the way, it is not a defense of all of Fuentes’ views. We interviewed him on the show and said it is totally immoral to hate Jews as a group because it’s totally immoral to hate any group. Period. That’s always wrong."

[Antoninus]

Tucker interviews Fuentes. Then, every outlet — left, right and center — talks about said interview for a month afterwards. And yet, somehow Tucker’s a bad guy for platforming Fuentes.

Make it make sense. If they really wanted to diminish Fuentes, they would have ignored the interview rather than amplify it.