Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outrage as Sikh trucker who killed 3 in US crash brought in court without turban
India Today ^ | 10/28/2025 | Gaurav Kumar

Posted on 10/28/2025 7:26:53 PM PDT by marcusmaximus

A 21-year-old Indian truck driver, Jashanpreet Singh, accused of causing an eight-vehicle crash in Southern California that killed three people, appeared in a US court without his turban—sparking outrage in India. Many, including Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) president Sukhbir Singh Badal, demanded that his turban be returned. A petition has also been launched, describing Singh's bareheaded court appearance as "a violation of Sikh faith" and urging authorities to "restore his religious rights and ensure a fair trial."

-snip-

Former Deputy Chief Minister of Punjab, Sukhbir Singh Badal, in a post on X, said he met the family of the accused, who asserted that Jashanpreet was not under the influence of drugs at the time of the accident.

"They firmly asserted that Jashanpreet, a hard-working youth, had been falsely accused of being under the influence in the tragic I-10 crash in San Bernardino County (US). They told me that the toxicology claims are a grave error and should be reviewed," Badal wrote.

"The distressing images of Jashanpreet being produced in court bareheaded—a violation of his Sikh—heighten our concern. Let justice prevail with mercy," he added.

In the post, he also urged Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar to ensure Jashanpreet's rights are protected.

PETITION SEEKS RETURN OF JASHANPREET'S TURBAN

(Excerpt) Read more at indiatoday.in ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegaltruth; india; indians; jashanpreetsingh; sikh; singh; summaryexecution; turban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: marcusmaximus
He didn't CAUSE the accident.

He WAS the accident.


41 posted on 10/28/2025 8:51:12 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Je suis Charlie Kirk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> sparking outrage in India.

to the outraged, GTH, GFY, ESAD... and don’t forget to bathe in the sewage of your nearby slum


42 posted on 10/28/2025 8:53:42 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

Trying to cope with the strain of the trial.

(It also prevents mind control.)


43 posted on 10/28/2025 9:10:18 PM PDT by PTBAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: whitney69
Separation of church and state.
_______________________

No, it's separation from church and state. In England the King is the head of the State and the leader of the church.

In the USA we do not have a church of the USA. It is separate.

44 posted on 10/28/2025 9:23:54 PM PDT by BarbM (Men who look at porn are impotent for God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

“He would likely be viewed more favorably by a jury without the turban.”

You are probably correct. So send him his turban, I want a guilty verdict.


45 posted on 10/28/2025 9:41:44 PM PDT by Morgana ( “Abortion is the ultimate exploitation of women.” — Alice Paul 🇺🇸 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Who gives a rip about the *outrage* in India???????

The guy murdered 3 people and seriously injured others, and caused lots of property damage and hardship to the AMERICAN families.

I don’t give a rip about anyone’s *dignity* or decorum at that point.


46 posted on 10/28/2025 9:42:21 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
He has not been adjudicated guilty yet. Our Constitution protects religious exercise. I don’t know if he wanted to wear his turban or not but if it is a religious obligation for Sihks and he was prevented from exercising it that would be a violation of our Constitution.

He's not an American citizen.

Besides, it's NOT a violation of our Constitution. Or do you consider it Constitutional right for muslims to carry out jihad against us, or vandalize church building, too? And then it would be unconstitutional for us to prosecute them in your book.

47 posted on 10/28/2025 9:47:32 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

Also, the court system is not Congress and they are not making a law regarding a religion, so there is no violation of the Constitution.


48 posted on 10/28/2025 9:49:24 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

That’s not funny, it’s Sikh!


49 posted on 10/28/2025 9:58:06 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I tried on a turban for the first time today...Made me feel a bit Sikh.


50 posted on 10/28/2025 10:23:52 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Too bad. We can send him back by catapult if they’re that ticked off.


51 posted on 10/28/2025 11:24:07 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Perhaps his lawyer had him remove it to make him more likeable.


52 posted on 10/29/2025 12:49:46 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
Obviously, there have got to be limits to Constitutional rights to practice religion.

Because Moose Limbs' religion says to lie, ambush, and cut off our heads.

Noodle that out please.

53 posted on 10/29/2025 2:07:33 AM PDT by caddie (Going forward we all need to become Trump, and also Captain Obvious, and Charlie Kirk too. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

He’ll find his turban back in India - where he belongs. Ship him back to it.....after he serves his prison sentence for 3 counts of manslaughter.


54 posted on 10/29/2025 2:32:24 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good Lord! That’s horrific!


55 posted on 10/29/2025 2:41:35 AM PDT by George Rockwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

As per the Sikh religion, the turban is NOT mandatory, but keeping his hair uncut (a la Samson) is Mandatory.

his hair is uncut, so this entire outrage is manufactured.


56 posted on 10/29/2025 3:19:45 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Both countries have extradition treaties with each other.

he should be sentenced in the USA and tossed into an India jail. The jails in India are far, far worse than in the USA.


57 posted on 10/29/2025 3:23:03 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: edwinland; metmom

“I don’t know if he wanted to wear his turban or not but if it is a religious obligation for Sihks and he was prevented from exercising it that would be a violation of our Constitution.”

The thing is that wearing a turban is not a religious obligation for Sikhs.

Keeping their hair long and uncut IS a religious obligation. Now he could wear it loose or tied into a bun or in a turban, but as long as it wasn’t forcibly cut, there is nothing against the Sikh religion here


58 posted on 10/29/2025 3:24:59 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LizzieD

I was looking through the punjabi papaers - Indian commenters have expressed little sympathy for Singh’s bareheaded appearance, suggesting that his alleged crimes are far more serious than his religious attire


59 posted on 10/29/2025 3:27:23 AM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Oh the horrors of not having his turban on in a courtroom. You morons who are OUTRAGED on that needs to be outraged on CALIFORNIA issued him a CDL License!!


60 posted on 10/29/2025 5:38:06 AM PDT by DeplorableTrumpSupporter (FKA ConservaTeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson