Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Confirm Widespread Microplastics in Milk and Cheese
Food & Wine ^ | October 12, 2025 | Stacey Leasca

Posted on 10/20/2025 12:55:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Researchers in Italy’s University of Padua detected plastic particles in nearly every dairy sample they tested, with the highest concentrations found in aged cheeses.

-A recent study out of the University of Padua in Italy found microplastics in nearly all dairy products tested — including milk, fresh cheese, and ripened cheese.

-The researchers found an average of 1,857 particles per kilogram in ripened cheese, 1,280 in fresh cheese, and about 350 in milk, likely from processing and packaging.

-While the study didn’t evaluate health effects, previous research links microplastics to heart and liver issues, raising concerns about plastic contamination in the food supply.

Microplastics are turning up just about everywhere in the global food supply, including in fish, cups of tea, and even in vegetables freshly plucked from the ground. And now, a recent peer-reviewed study published in the journal NPJ Science of Food says they're swirling around in our milk, too.

Researchers from Italy’s University of Padua shared their findings after analyzing microplastics in dairy products, including milk, fresh cheese, and ripened cheese. The team examined 28 retail samples, including cartons of milk, 10 fresh cheeses aged less than one month, and 14 ripened cheeses aged more than four months. The researchers minimized cross-contamination risk by conducting their tests in a "Class 7 cleanroom" and using cleaned glassware, ensuring that any microplastics detected were present from the start.

The team then separated the dairy from any potential microplastic particles and used a powerful infrared microscope to identify each piece, scanning them repeatedly to confirm the results. Unsurprisingly, they found microplastic particles in 26 out of 28 products tested, most often identifying polyethylene terephthalate, also known as PET, a plastic commonly used in food packaging and plastic bottles, along with polyethylene, the most widely used plastic, and polypropylene, a thermoplastic polymer also frequently used in food packaging.

The team found significantly more microplastics in cheese than in milk. Ripened cheese had the highest levels, about 1,857 particles per kilogram, followed by fresh cheese at 1,280 particles per kilogram, and milk with around 350 particles per kilogram. The researchers noted that the difference between cheese and milk was substantial enough to be considered meaningful. Their findings suggest the additional microplastics are likely introduced during processing, due to the additional steps involved in pressing, aging, and packaging cheese, including everything from feed bags to retail wrappers.

As the authors noted, this study merely documented the presence of microplastics; it did not analyze or seek to understand the health effects on people consuming them. However, a growing body of research is pointing to the potential harm of microplastics to human health.

More Than Half of Plastic Food Packaging Can Be Replaced, According to a New Study Food & Wine has reported on numerous microplastic studies, including one that showed microplastics can build up in the arterial plaque of patients with cardiovascular disease. The researchers in that study noted that these micro- and nanoplastics can trigger "toxicologic effects" when they enter the human body through "ingestion, inhalation, and skin exposure." They added that the microscopic particles pose a risk factor for various conditions, including "altered heart rate, cardiac-function impairment, myocardial fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction," along with general oxidative stress and inflammation.

Additional research has found microplastics in nearly every part of the human body, including the lungs, blood, and liver, which one study noted could be contributing to liver damage. While there is little one can do at this point about microplastics in our environment, there are a few ways to limit your exposure, including taking these steps in your kitchen to reduce your chances of encountering additional microplastics at home.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: dairy; food; microplastics

1 posted on 10/20/2025 12:55:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Except for the weight, I would prefer milk, and other drinks, came in glass bottles.


2 posted on 10/20/2025 1:06:01 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

The article claims that the micro plastics were in the milk from the start, not from the containers the milk or cheese were packaged in.


3 posted on 10/20/2025 1:08:07 PM PDT by tcox4575
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcox4575

Kinda biologically impossible. Certainly improbable.

I’d like to know what size these ‘particles’ are.


4 posted on 10/20/2025 1:28:36 PM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Milk - go back to glass bottles we used to get from the milk man delivered to the house when I was a kid.

Plain glass is continuously recyclable.

A local whole foods store sells milk in glass bottles. Yes, they want more per oz than milk in milk cartons. Maybe worth it.

Yes. Milk in glass bottles will cost more due to a number of differences in production and transportation. But milk bottles could all go back to the retailer, to be picked up by the milk distributor, and glass bottles can be sterilized & reused, and don’t need to add to the landfill (cartons can good go to recycle but a lot of people just put them in the garbage). And yes, it takes more energy to bring and keep a glass bottle to the right cold storage temperature, but reusing glass bottles and their sterilization uses far less energy than the manufacture of single use paper or plastic milk cartons.


5 posted on 10/20/2025 1:33:38 PM PDT by Wuli (uire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“They added that the microscopic particles pose a risk factor for various conditions, including “altered heart rate, cardiac-function impairment, myocardial fibrosis, and endothelial dysfunction,” along with general oxidative stress and inflammation. “


“risk factor” coming out of their rear end.
Enough with the fear porn.


6 posted on 10/20/2025 2:31:16 PM PDT by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Skeptical about this latest food scare.


7 posted on 10/20/2025 3:06:00 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

8 posted on 10/20/2025 3:31:45 PM PDT by Delta 21 (None of us are descendants of fearful men!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21
Buck Henry stole that from It's a Wonderful Life.
9 posted on 10/20/2025 3:46:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Micro plastics are by definition, 1 nanometer (nm) and 5 million nm (or 5 millimeters [mm]) in size. The smaller sizes are in everything. You cannot sample water anywhere fresh or ocean with out some in it. Same for fish from the ocean. Every sample taken from a human or mammal regardless of where they live or what organ also had quantifiable microplastics. It’s in the waters all of them even rain, soil, feed, foods and air. If you wear synthetic fabrics like polyester it not only sheds on your skin but some of the particles are small enough to pass the skin barrier and be absorbed directly. This means wearing a polyester shirt can put microplastics directly into the blood stream plus what your inhale wearing it.

[studies found the average brain may contain 4,806 micrograms per gram (or 7 grams), which is about the weight of a plastic spoon]

Yeah it’s like this. Our planet is utterly polluted with plastics , something we should stop post haste. Glass, aluminum, paper and wax packaging.

It’s just science. Plastic is a bad idea for food contact, plates cups bottles wrap all of it no. Like I said every wearing it is exposing you.


10 posted on 10/20/2025 4:24:41 PM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Keep eating off plastics it will help the gene pool. Synthetic hydrocarbons don’t belong in the human body but do you boo boo


11 posted on 10/20/2025 4:26:09 PM PDT by GenXPolymath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
Except for the weight, I would prefer milk, and other drinks, came in glass bottles.

Indeed. Milk in cardboard tastes better.

Exposure of milk to UV light facilitates the oxidation of fats to aldehydes, and the degradation of sulfur-containing amino acids, both of which contribute to off-flavors. In addition, vitamin A and riboflavin are easily degraded by UV light. These reactions occur rapidly and are exacerbated by bright fluorescent lights in retail dairy cases. The invention of white light-emitting diodes (LED) may provide a solution to this oxidation problem. - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030216001351

12 posted on 10/21/2025 1:55:24 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves damned+destitute sinners on His acct, believe, b baptized+follow HIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

.
But, but the Mediterranean Diet is so Healthy.


13 posted on 10/21/2025 7:06:39 AM PDT by CoastWatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson