Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Welcome to the War Department' -- The reckoning begins
American Thinker ^ | 1 Oct, 2025 | Robert L. Maginnis

Posted on 10/01/2025 5:27:41 AM PDT by MtnClimber

At Quantico, Secretary Pete Hegseth and President Donald Trump delivered a blunt message to America’s generals: the age of political correctness is over, and uncompromising readiness is now the standard.

When Secretary Pete Hegseth strode to the podium at Quantico and declared, “Welcome to the War Department,” he did more than rename an institution. He called for a reckoning.

Hegseth’s speech was direct and unsparing. “The era of politically correct, overly sensitive don’t-hurt-anyone’s-feelings leadership ends right now.” He pledged to “clear out the debris, remove distractions, [and] clear the way for leaders to be leaders… You might say, we’re ending the war on warriors.” He ordered that “each service will ensure that every requirement for every combat MOS for every designated combat arms position returns to the highest male standard only.” He invoked a new rule “for commanders”: “Do unto your unit as you would have done unto your own child’s unit.”

President Donald Trump then completed the message with a vow to rebuild America’s military might. He promised to make the armed forces “stronger, tougher, faster, fiercer and more powerful than it has ever been before,” adding, “I support you, and as president, I have your backs 100%.” Yet he also issued a stark warning: “If I don’t like somebody, I’m going to fire them right on the spot.”

The words were bold, even historic. But the challenge is clear: rhetoric must be matched by disciplined reform.

Readiness Must Follow Rhetoric

The “warrior ethos” cannot rest on slogans or speeches alone. Standards must be tied to measurable outcomes: deployable brigades, validated joint certifications, combat-credible training cycles. “Clearing debris” must mean doctrine and discipline, not theater.

Meritocracy, Not Ideology

Trump’s solidarity line -- “I have your backs 100%” -- is important for morale. However, his threat to fire generals risks undermining professionalism.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: beardos; leftism; wokedepartments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2025 5:27:41 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No more furries.


2 posted on 10/01/2025 5:27:52 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
However, his threat to fire generals risks undermining professionalism

Does anyone agree with that?
3 posted on 10/01/2025 5:32:45 AM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Department of War ALERT! Thanks to every past, present and future warrior.


4 posted on 10/01/2025 5:32:58 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

WTF?

The generals at risk of being fired are the generals who undermine professionalism.


5 posted on 10/01/2025 5:35:39 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I highly recommend finding Hegseth’s speech and watching the whole thing through. His delivery was articulate, pointed and charismatic. Called out everything... No more of that $hit.

Basic Training goes back to the Beetle Bailey days.
Focus on war fighting and winning rather than political debris.
If you don’t want to lead in that direction, we thank you for your service, you’re invited to resign.


6 posted on 10/01/2025 5:37:17 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Does this mean the Queer dog masks and leather BDSM “ pup culture” are no longer a vital part of military culture


7 posted on 10/01/2025 5:37:36 AM PDT by rdcbn1 (..when poets buy guns, tourist season is over................Walter R. Mead.l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“Dudes in dresses...we’re done with that crap”


8 posted on 10/01/2025 5:43:26 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
"However, his threat to fire generals risks undermining professionalism"

Does anyone agree with that?

NOPE. I wondered what people would think about that.

9 posted on 10/01/2025 5:44:28 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

This is what WE voted for.


10 posted on 10/01/2025 5:46:31 AM PDT by MGunny ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

This is what WE voted for.


11 posted on 10/01/2025 5:47:29 AM PDT by MGunny ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
However, his threat to fire generals risks undermining professionalism.

Does anyone agree with that?

Is it a risk? Certainly. The question is: What criteria can result in an immediate firing?

First, there is a process for making assignments, and for terminating them. If this process is undermined so that an officer can be fired (or at least it seems like he can) for arbitrary reasons, or just because he embarrassed someone in the administration, then it leads to an overly-cautious mindset - which is bad for military professionalism.

Second, mistakes - particularly public mistakes - largely fall into two main categories: Mistakes from incompetence or carelessness, and mistakes from over aggressiveness. If there is no distinction between the two, then you'll get the overly-cautious mindset. Chester Nimitz had a couple of (relatively minor) shiphandling incidents when he was commanding smaller warships. If those got him fired, we'd lose a great leader. Richard Bong nearly lost his wings for showing off in his P-38 before he ever got into combat. There needs to be some tolerance for aggressive, even arrogant confidence.

On the other hand, if it becomes clear that CYA caution results in termination, then it might be the best thing that has happened to the US Military since 1944.


12 posted on 10/01/2025 5:53:03 AM PDT by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MGunny

This is what WE voted for.


I think that there were others who voted differently.
Good or Bad life moves on. Enjoy as best you can.


13 posted on 10/01/2025 5:53:41 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack
I highly recommend finding Hegseth’s speech and watching the whole thing through. His delivery was articulate, pointed and charismatic. Called out everything... No more of that $hit.

I agree. When I watched I developed what we a few years ago called a "man crush". LOL It was 100% right, 100% charismatic, and 100% the kind of leadership not only our military needs, but men in general need.

14 posted on 10/01/2025 5:58:53 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Pete finally came out of his shell and lived up and exceeded expectations....good to see.


15 posted on 10/01/2025 6:00:36 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I was extremely impressed with Pete Hegseth’s speech yesterday. It hit all the problems that the Obama and Biden administrations had foisted on our military. Ever since my son was in ROTC, I couldn’t understand why there was one set of standards for men and a watered down standard for women. Unless you are in a military family you have no idea what the military life entails.

I was talking to my daughter about the speech and only got as far as the overweight generals being told to shape up or ship out when her TDS took over. She blasted Trump for eliminating soldiers that had devoted their lives to the military. Feelings over facts. She felt they were ignoring the knowledge they possessed and focused on their weight. My father-in-law, an ex Air Force gunner during WWII, was at the same weight at 86 when he passed as when he was in the Air Force. A general in his 60’s should be able to state the same. The military is no place to maintain soldiers that are not up to the task, in mind and body.


16 posted on 10/01/2025 6:03:39 AM PDT by heylady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

Nope.


17 posted on 10/01/2025 6:08:44 AM PDT by MulberryDraw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Watched the entire speech, awesome! Especially loved Hegseth calling the generals and troops as, “FAT!”


18 posted on 10/01/2025 6:11:24 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Yes I agree. As someone stated above “The generals at risk of being fired are the generals who undermine professionalism.” If you have ever been a boss that required your staff to be professional and those that were not professional were not doing their job. Therefore: fired.


19 posted on 10/01/2025 6:12:43 AM PDT by Hot Rod Garage (Sh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy; MtnClimber; NorthMountain; Phlyer; MulberryDraw; Tell It Right; 1Old Pro
That stuck out at me as well:

Meritocracy, Not Ideology

Trump’s solidarity line -- “I have your backs 100%” -- is important for morale. However, his threat to fire generals risks undermining professionalism. Promotions, reliefs, and assignments must rest on performance in warfighting environments, not political litmus tests.

I did not like this one part. The two things, IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE OF CONSERVATISM AND LEFTISM (AS EMBODIED IN DEI) are NOT mutually exclusive.

I did not appreciate that statement at all. If the litmus test is support for DEI, that means prima facie that you do NOT support competency.

In an otherwise good article, this is a blemish in my opinion.

20 posted on 10/01/2025 6:13:52 AM PDT by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson