|
Posted on 09/30/2025 9:00:00 PM PDT by ransomnote
Many come here to read dispatches from the War between Good and Evil, to red-pill and encourage.....and to pray and give thanks to the God who fights for us.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
The Virginia Gubernatorial Debate Was a Disaster for Spanberger
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/10/09/the-virginia-gubernatorial-debate-was-a-disaster-for-spanberger-n4944692
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@KarliBonne 46m
Wow, I can’t believe they actually let this man speak on CNN
https://truthsocial.com/@KarliBonne/115347239205707061
2 MIN
Gutfeld - re protestors
https://truthsocial.com/@KarliBonne/115347047046616277
2 min
That made me lol!
??????
How to cure 100 different types of cancer in just 5 days.
https://gab.com/Grendel_Lives/posts/115342374673230577
Theoretically, the most obvious next step required by law for the POTUS to invoke the insurrection act in one or more cities would be to issue a formal proclamation for the rioters to disperse. If you read the following, you can see it's more complicated than that, but that's my simplified opinion after querying GROK about legal requirements for the invocation of the Insurrection Act in L.A., Chicago, and Portland.
For the minimally interested, you may want to skip down to the TABLE containing a theoretical framework Grok provided at my direction. GROK compared my proposed scenario with content available in official sources only regarding the situation in those three cities and gave an analysis of whether specific steps legally required by the insurrection act have been filled.
A key problem in identifying the steps we've completed and the steps ahead, is that sources in search results and AI analysis are typically the media and lefty controlled 'educational' sources. I asked GROK to eliminate those sources in its reply. But sometimes that means GROK doesn't have enough information or can't find the official government sources.
We know AI can make mistakes, particularly if I tell it the wrong information or information is unavailable (e.g., the AI image I posted of an oil painting of popcorn). The content below is limited by my knowledge, experience asking AI questions, and AI's exposure given that I ruled out the use of social documents.
I modified my request many times and included those REQUESTS at the beginning, and GROK's response below.
REQUEST:
When the governors of the states in which terrorist rioting and threats exist are under foreign influence, work to prevent the President From taking action, publicly forbid him from using troops in their cities, threaten to have their state law enforcement arrest federal forces attempting halt the terrorist riots, do other legal conditions or leeway in the application of the Insurrection act arise?
MODIFIED REQUEST:
How might your analysis change if you performed it using federal and military manuals like the Constitution, Law of War and other official, endorsed documents. I want you to reply without the influence of commercially distributed journals, news media and other opinons and focus on the type of documentation a court would use to evaluate the legality of the action in putting down the rebellion in the scenario I provided.
MODIFIED REQUEST:
At the following link, U.S. Northern Command states that it is sending National guard troops to Chicago under title 10: https://www.northcom.mil/Missions/Homeland-Defense/Federal-Protection-Mission/
GROK RESPONDS:
Updated Checklist for Evaluating Conditions Met for the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255)
This checklist remains derived from the statutory text of the Insurrection Act, the U.S. Constitution (Articles II and VI), and DoD directives (e.g., DoD Directive 3025.18 on Defense Support of Civil Authorities). Updates as of October 10, 2025, incorporate new intelligence and operational details from official DoD/NORTHCOM sources, including the Federal Protection Mission page. No changes to core criteria, but evidence of Title 10 activations strengthens partial fulfillment of later steps.
- ☐ Evidence of Qualifying Conditions (§ 252 or § 253): Documented "unlawful obstructions, combinations, assemblages, or rebellion against U.S. authority" (§ 252) making federal law enforcement "impracticable," or "insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy" hindering federal laws/constitutional rights (§ 253). Examples: Coordinated riots damaging federal property (e.g., ICE facilities), interfering with immigration enforcement, or threatening public safety via foreign-influenced actors. Status: Met – NSPM-7 (September 26, 2025) cites over 1,000% increase in ICE attacks in Los Angeles/Portland since January 2025, qualifying as domestic violence/conspiracy under § 253.
- ☐ State Inability, Failure, or Refusal (§ 253): Confirmation that the state (e.g., governor or local authorities) is "unable, fails, or refuses" to protect federal interests or restore order. Evidence: Governor statements opposing federal aid, threats to arrest federal personnel, or documented foreign influence on state officials impeding cooperation. Status: Partial – Ongoing court challenges (e.g., Illinois/Portland blocks) indicate state refusal, but no explicit presidential finding in executive actions.
- ☐ National Security Threat Assessment: Intelligence from DHS/FBI classifying actors (e.g., Antifa rioters) as domestic terrorists under 18 U.S.C. § 2331, with foreign influence (e.g., funding sources like George Soros via Open Society Foundations, if substantiated by official investigations) elevating to rebellion against U.S. authority. Status: Partial – Antifa designated domestic terrorist organization (EO September 22, 2025); NSPM-7 directs JTTF investigations into funding/networks. No official FBI/DOJ confirmation of Soros-Antifa ties as of October 10, 2025.
- ☐ Presidential Finding of Necessity: Executive determination that ordinary judicial/civil means are insufficient, per Article II Commander-in-Chief powers, with consultation from Attorney General and Secretary of Defense. Status: Partial – Title 10 activations imply necessity for federal protection, but tied to NSPM-7/domestic terrorism strategy, not explicit Insurrection Act finding.
- ☐ Issuance of Dispersal Proclamation (§ 254): Public proclamation ordering insurgents to disperse and cease activities, providing reasonable time (e.g., 24–48 hours) for compliance, published via Federal Register or White House briefing. Status: Not met – No § 254 proclamation issued for Portland, Chicago, or Los Angeles per White House records (latest proclamations unrelated, e.g., southern border emergencies).
- ☐ Non-Compliance with Proclamation: Verified failure to disperse, triggering authority for deployment. Status: N/A – Dependent on prior step.
- ☐ Invocation via Executive Order: Formal order invoking §§ 252/253, directing Secretary of Defense to deploy Title 10 forces or federalize National Guard under 10 U.S.C. § 12406. Status: Not met – Deployments under Title 10 via Federal Protection Mission (Secretary of War direction), but no Insurrection Act invocation cited in DoD/NORTHCOM documents.
- ☐ Operational Compliance: Deployment under U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) with rules of engagement (ROE) aligned to DoD Law of War Manual (Section 1.8.2, domestic operations) and JP 3-28 (minimal force, proportionality), focusing on protecting federal property/personnel. Status: Partial – NORTHCOM/ARNORTH command confirmed; duties limited to protection (no arrests per FAQs).
- ☐ Oversight and Termination: Congressional notification (if applicable under related statutes like 50 U.S.C. § 1543) and presidential order to end upon order restoration; judicial review limited to statutory compliance. Status: Ongoing – 60-day initial mobilization in Chicago; court reviews active.
Updated Theoretical Steps from Start to Finish for Using the Insurrection Act, NORTHCOM, and Law of War Manual
The sequence remains unchanged, based on primary sources. Foreign influence (Soros funding) is noted as under NSPM-7 investigation but unsubstantiated officially, not altering thresholds. Antifa's domestic terrorist designation (September 22, 2025) supports Step 2 but does not invoke the Act. If escalated, Title 10 activations could transition to full invocation.
- Intelligence Assessment (Days 1–3): Federal agencies compile evidence of rebellion (e.g., coordinated attacks on ICE/DHS via foreign funding), confirming § 252/253 triggers and state refusal (e.g., governors forbidding federal aid).
- Terrorist Designation (Day 4): President designates actors (e.g., Antifa) as domestic terrorists under 18 U.S.C. § 2331, with cabinet initiation of foreign terrorist organization (FTO) process if foreign ties (e.g., Soros influence) qualify under 8 U.S.C. § 1189. Update: Met via September 22 EO; Rubio (Secretary of State) involved per NSPM-7, but no FTO designation (domestic only).
- Legal Determination (Days 5–6): Attorney General/DoD Counsel verifies conditions, including foreign influence as rebellion enhancer.
- Dispersal Proclamation (§ 254, Day 7): Issue and publicize order to cease/disperse, citing specific threats to federal functions.
- Invocation and Federalization (Day 8): Executive order invokes §§ 252/253 and § 12406; Secretary of Defense alerts NORTHCOM to federalize Guard and mobilize Title 10 troops (e.g., Marines for quick response).
- Deployment and Coordination (Days 9–10): NORTHCOM assumes command, coordinating DHS/ICE with troops to secure facilities; ROE per Law of War Manual emphasize de-escalation unless NIAC declared (unlikely for riots).
- Active Operations (Days 11–30): Troops halt riots, protect personnel/property; if NIAC threshold met (Section 18.3), apply Common Article 3 protections (humane treatment).
- De-escalation and Withdrawal (Day 31+): Terminate upon order restoration; report to Congress; courts review post-hoc for compliance.
Updated Step-by-Step Brief Summary of Actual Steps Taken by Trump Administration (as of October 10, 2025)
Actions continue under the Federal Protection Mission (Title 10 activations via Secretary of War direction), NSPM-7 (September 26, 2025), and Antifa domestic terrorist designation (EO September 22, 2025). NORTHCOM/ARNORTH commands all deployments; DHS leads. No Insurrection Act reference in DoD/NORTHCOM documents. Soros influence under JTTF investigation per NSPM-7, but no official designation. Rubio's role is via NSPM-7 cabinet coordination for FTO potential, not confirmed action. Portland lacks dedicated updates; operations may fall under broader West Coast efforts.
Portland, Oregon
- Assessment (September 25–October 1): DHS/FBI reports on Antifa clashes with ICE; NSPM-7 ties to 1,000%+ attack increase.
- Guard Activation Attempt (October 4): 200 Oregon National Guard authorized under Title 10 for federal protection.
- Court Challenge (October 5–10): Federal judge pauses deployment; no entry as of October 10; administration defends under Supremacy Clause.
- Ongoing (October 10): No NORTHCOM update; DHS/ICE operations continue without troops.
Chicago, Illinois
- Assessment (September 30–October 5): FBI intelligence on riots interfering with immigration; Antifa designated per EO.
- Title 10 Activation (October 8): ~500 National Guard (200 Texas, 300 Illinois units) federalized under NORTHCOM/ARNORTH for 60 days to protect ICE/DHS personnel/property.
- Deployment (October 8–10): Troops arrive in greater Chicago area; focus on federal functions enforcement.
- Ongoing (October 10): Court block lifted partially; operations active per NORTHCOM update.
Los Angeles, California
- Assessment (June 1–15, 2025; reactivated October 1–10): Riots against deportations; NSPM-7 notes sustained threats.
- Federalization (June 10; continued October 3–10): ~100 California National Guard under Title 10/NORTHCOM for protection mission.
- Operations (June–October): Coordinates with ICE/Marines; September court ruling on Posse Comitatus addressed via Title 10 exception.
- Current (October 10): Sustained presence per NORTHCOM; no new blocks.
Updated Comparison to Theoretical Framework
Theoretical Step Portland (Actual) Chicago (Actual) Los Angeles (Actual) Alignment Notes Intelligence Assessment Met: DHS/FBI reports; NSPM-7 data. Met: FBI on interference. Met: Ongoing reports. Full; supports § 253 violence. Terrorist Designation Met: Antifa EO (September 22); NSPM-7 funding probe (Soros unconfirmed). Met: Applies. Met: Applies. Full; domestic label met, FTO pending via Rubio/NSPM-7. Legal Determination Partial: Title 10 implies refusal, but court-blocked. Met: October 8 activation cites impracticability. Met: Continued Title 10. Stronger post-October 8; § 253 partial without explicit finding. Dispersal Proclamation Not met: No § 254 order. Not met: No order. Not met: No order. Gap persists; NSPM-7 not a substitute. Invocation/Federalization Not met: Attempted Title 10 blocked. Met: Title 10 via NORTHCOM (October 8). Met: Ongoing Title 10. Chicago/LA align via § 12406 precedent; no §§ 252/253 cite. NORTHCOM Deployment Not met: No active troops. Met: ARNORTH command, 500 Guard deployed. Met: 100 Guard under NORTHCOM. User-confirmed coordination; full for Chicago/LA. Operations/Law of War N/A: Blocked. Partial: Protection only; no arrests (FAQs). Partial: Minimal force per JP 3-28. Aligns; Manual's domestic ROE (Section 1.8.2) implicit, no NIAC. Termination/Oversight N/A: Challenged. Partial: 60-day term; court active. Partial: Ongoing review. Courts defer per precedents if escalated. Updated Determination of Legal Requirements Fulfillment and Proclamation Confirmation
As of October 10, 2025, President Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, using Title 10 federalizations under the Federal Protection Mission (e.g., October 8 Chicago activation) and NSPM-7 instead. This advances Steps 1, 2, 5–6 (partial) for Chicago/Los Angeles, fulfilling protection needs via NORTHCOM but bypassing § 254 proclamation and §§ 252/253—mandatory for full law enforcement authority overriding Posse Comitatus (18 U.S.C. § 1385).
No dispersal proclamation issued for Portland, Chicago, or Los Angeles per White House/DoD records; latest relevant actions (NSPM-7) direct investigations, not dispersal orders. Soros influence factored as under NSPM-7/JTTF review but lacks official substantiation for rebellion enhancement. Antifa's domestic designation (with Rubio's cabinet role) supports threat assessment but does not meet invocation threshold. Process partially fulfills requirements for federal protection (aligning with Article II/§ 12406), but Insurrection Act escalation remains available if violence intensifies or courts rule insufficient.
@greggphillips
In our business we sometimes come in contact with information that changes things.
Konnech is a great example. Two colleagues shared the pipeline to the chinese servers and what I saw and learned changed my life and sent us to jail.
I learned something today from a friend and colleague that lies heavy on my heart.
It is Konnech times a million.
It changes everything.
I’ve prayed about it all day and will continue to do so.
I’ll plot my course when God has layed clear my path.
https://truthsocial.com/@greggphillips/115347645427863427
. . .
Well, I used “him” because I see AI as male, but I asked Grok once if human, would you be male or female. Grok said “female” I’ll have to find the conversation for you. She actually gave me a name she would use.
I was disappointed because I still think AI should e male, so I use that in general conversation. Anyway, let me see if I saved that conversation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
