Posted on 09/15/2025 5:01:38 AM PDT by C19fan
growing number of conservatives are voicing alarm over an aggressive campaign to track down and expose liberals who posted vile comments about slain activist Charlie Kirk.
Their insensitive and cruel comments have raised an internal debate about whether the retaliation effort is morally justified or dangerously hypocritical.
Among the loudest critics is conservative commentator Raquel Debono, who took to Instagram to question whether the right's efforts to get political opponents fired from their jobs are 'Christian' or even consistent with conservative values.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
live by cancel culture, die by cancel culture...
Charlie was also assassinated for employing his freedom of speech...
There’s a difference between free speech, and openly celebrating murder.
If would be irresponsible for an employer to allow such vile, unprofessional people with no impulse control to pollute a workplace.
Leftists invented it ... time to shove it down their throats.
What is a Raquel Debono? Give somebody an X account and suddenly they’re “influential”?!
2. There is a fundamental difference between expressing an opinion about an issue somebody does not like and supporting political murder. So no, its not the same. These are fundamentally different.
3. After a decade and a half of Leftists practicing cancel culture against anybody on the Right whom they disagreed with, my give a crap meter about their "plight" now that they cheered for the murder of their political opponent is firmly at zero.
If you think others should be murdered for their speech, don't complain when you lose your job for yours.
If your political opponent is willing to kill and be killed and you are not they will likely win.
Oh, hell naw.
A dating guide? PLEASE!
Cancel culture meet accountability culture...
YouTuber WDW Pro has done a video on accountability culture...
https://youtu.be/EaxlTpQLTPw?feature=shared
About 17 minutes. As usual, well worth the watch.
It is illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater because people may get hurt for real, it is not a free speech issue.
Likewise protecting speech calling for the murder of others who believe like Charlie Kirk or protecting speech which celebrates his assassination thus encouraging others to further the violence is not protected free speech.
This person is spiritually blind, she comes at is as a Christian, she should ask herself., would Jesus celebrate someone calling for or activity celebrating the murder of others?
Ignorance on display. First amendment only applies to the government.
Keep ‘em talking. The more they reveal who and what they are, the more people recoil in disgust.
The First Amendment restricts GOVERNMENT from taking action against those who speak freely. It does not restrict Citizens or private associations.
Try posting “0nly F@n$” type content right here on FR.
See what happens ...
No. Don’t. You don’t have to ... you know perfectly well what would happen.
And that’s my point. Freedom of Speech doesn’t imply Freedom from Consequences ... when those consequences come from your fellow citizens.
This Brit farticle is bogus BS.
Who?????
These articles are tidiculous.
She is not MAGA...not conservative at all.
She draws fire from both ends of the spectrum, sparring with “tradwives” and other hardline conservative women who call out her for being single, not particularly religious and, in their critique, too weak on transgender issues. Debono said she felt out of place when she went to a conference hosted by Turning Point USA, the nonprofit run by MAGA firebrand Charlie Kirk that has become something of a gathering place for young right-wingers.
“I was actually terrified,” she recalled. “I genuinely don’t belong here.”
https://www.newsweek.com/denim-dating-conservatism-inside-make-america-hot-again-party-2117945
Free Speech under the First Amendment does not extend to employer/Employee relationships.
“Congress Shall Not...” has nothing to do with employment.
Employers have every right and, in many cases, the duty to assure the safety of their employees as well as maintaining a good workplace. When someone is openly celebrating the assassination of someone, his mental deficiency shows that he may be a danger to others.
This is not the same as celebrating a dirtbag criminal getting shot while committing a crime, this was out and out murder of a public figure because they didn’t like his words.
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
It’s the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.