Posted on 09/14/2025 10:13:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The September 9 hearing on vaccine safety led by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) exposed what many Americans are now beginning to realize: the medical community has arguably been duped into believing that vaccines are unequivocally safe. The hearing, titled “How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines,” was led by Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It followed other hearings conducted by Johnson on the subject of COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 mRNA shots.
Three witnesses — physician Dr. Jake Scott, attorney Aaron Siri, and Stanford infectious diseases researcher Dr. Toby Rogers, with Scott defending vaccine research and trials and Siri and Rogers questioning them — offered sharply divergent pictures on the reliability of vaccine research and, by extension, vaccine safety. Both camps cited data, but Siri and Rogers proved to be the more nimble and better-informed interpreters of the evidence. Taken together, their testimony reinforced the growing impression that vaccines have never been subjected to the kind of rigorous study the public assumes.
Importantly, the committee put into the public record two irreconcilable records about how vaccine safety should be demonstrated. Siri submitted to the committee an unpublished study conducted inside Henry Ford Health in Detroit. The Ford study contends that real-world comparison is the most meaningful. It studied two cohorts over time, vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children, showing large, repeated signals of vaccine harm in the Ford health system.
The study tracked 18,468 children from birth within the Henry Ford system (1,957 unvaccinated, 16,511 who received at least one vaccine). Using Cox proportional hazard models, the analysis found that vaccination exposure was independently associated with elevated risks across several outcomes: any chronic condition (HR 2.53, 95% CI 2.16–2.96), asthma (HR 4.25, 3.23–5.59), autoimmune disease (HR 4.79, 1.36–16.94),...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
It’s cheaper to get vaccinated. Keeps you healthy, too.
—————-
You are funny. RFK and those following close know better. You are a victim of senile Joe’s “ safe and effective” rubbish.
Why are you spamming me? Please stop.
You paid a little over $2 per 22 mg capsule.
—————-
I looked at the Amazon “ Ivermectin” brand. Correct me, no “country of origin” listed. I prefer to use a licensed U.S. pharmacy who I can call and ask questions, and is governed by Tenn. law.
When I called, the Pharmacist answered my many questions, the important question, effective against Cancer? She replied they now have many people ordering that are undergoing Cancer treatments….and some of them have prescribed Ivermectin by doctors in their treatment.
The “ battle” with the entrenched Pharma, medical and insurance companies has silently begun….with many doctors now trying inexpensive Ivermectin as treatment for Cancer.
no fair using facts...
My skepticism increased when I went to the CDC site to research masks. There was a lot of wearing a mask is good because ... we say it’s good, go to this page that says it’s good because ...
The first time I went, after digging deep into their site, they had a number of studies that showed masks caught droplets. Nothing about reducing the chance of catching Covid or lessening its severity.
The second time I went, months later, same thing. Masks catch droplets, nothing about whether this helped. And still nothing about the downside of masks - bacteria and reduced social interaction.
Months later, I went again. More on catching droplets. And one (one!) study with a weak conclusion masks might help.
The deadliest disease in the history of the world and they can’t do a study that definitively addresses the efficacy of masks. Five years later, I still haven’t seen such a study
**
I waited a few months to see a specialist about a medical issue. I remember going back to my car after deciding to humor them if they were still requiring masks. To my surprise, not only were they requiring masks, but patients had to wear one of theirs. The cheap Chinese blue ones.
I refused to do so. A manager came out and made a token effort to convince me. I left without being seen. They never followed up to try to work something out.
Where is your Ivermectin from? One site touts that theirs is from India, everybody else’s is from China.
On whether or not masks work on viral particles, I relied upon clean room engineers. Those guys know more about airborne contaminants than anybody. They found a properly fitted N-95 50% effective, at best. A surgical mask was good for no more than 10%. They’re good for stopping a sneeze into an open wound, but no more.
My Amazon order went through @ 3am CT this morning. Try again?
Where is your Ivermectin from? One site touts that theirs is from India, everybody else’s is from China.
—————-
I no longer buy from abroad. US manufacture now. With more and more States now allowing Ivermectin without presciption, I buy from Tennesee, a few hour drive. I wouldn’t trust Amazon Ivermectin unless it is from the US.
It doesn’t look like there is any low-hanging fruit here in the Northeast. May have to get from India again.
While the chain link fence analogy was flawed, the cheap blue masks never looked like a good idea.
The other problem was what the masks were keeping in. If one inhaled the virus and subsequently exhaled it, was keeping a mask on all day a good idea? How about breathing exhaled bacteria? Particularly after putting it in a warm moist environment? How about getting less oxygen all day?
Is that any vaccine at all? Just the CoViD “vaccines”?
Brian, in ‘77 the Swine Flu vaxx was halted after causing fewer than 3 dozen reported deaths and around 500 injuries.
Why is human life worth so much less now?
The mRNA therapy for SARS-CoV-2 (the "COVID vaccine") is destructive to reproductive health, especially in women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.