Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/14/2025 10:13:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The September 9 hearing on vaccine safety led by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) exposed what many Americans are now beginning to realize: the medical community has arguably been duped into believing that vaccines are unequivocally safe. The hearing, titled “How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines,” was led by Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. It followed other hearings conducted by Johnson on the subject of COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 mRNA shots.
Three witnesses — physician Dr. Jake Scott, attorney Aaron Siri, and Stanford infectious diseases researcher Dr. Toby Rogers, with Scott defending vaccine research and trials and Siri and Rogers questioning them — offered sharply divergent pictures on the reliability of vaccine research and, by extension, vaccine safety. Both camps cited data, but Siri and Rogers proved to be the more nimble and better-informed interpreters of the evidence. Taken together, their testimony reinforced the growing impression that vaccines have never been subjected to the kind of rigorous study the public assumes.
Importantly, the committee put into the public record two irreconcilable records about how vaccine safety should be demonstrated. Siri submitted to the committee an unpublished study conducted inside Henry Ford Health in Detroit. The Ford study contends that real-world comparison is the most meaningful. It studied two cohorts over time, vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children, showing large, repeated signals of vaccine harm in the Ford health system.
The study tracked 18,468 children from birth within the Henry Ford system (1,957 unvaccinated, 16,511 who received at least one vaccine). Using Cox proportional hazard models, the analysis found that vaccination exposure was independently associated with elevated risks across several outcomes: any chronic condition (HR 2.53, 95% CI 2.16–2.96), asthma (HR 4.25, 3.23–5.59), autoimmune disease (HR 4.79, 1.36–16.94),...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The biggie is going to be reproductive integrity. That data will take a very long time to acquire.
I don’t believe the medical community was duped at all. I think at best they violated their oaths as medical professionals. Either they didn’t do their own research, or they knowingly submitted their patients to these killer jabs. The writer state that one important thing that occurred is that all this was put “on record”. That means nothing unless there are consequences to their actions.
“ The biggie is going to be reproductive integrity. That data will take a very long time to acquire.”
So why did anyone take this?
That’s obvious. They didn’t even take time to test mice
Trump said use hydoxychloroqine (which doesn’t even come up in auto correct) and ivermectin
Then he got completely ignored as is the case now about anything he is doing
But I heard him loud and clear.
” . .biggie is going to be reproductive integrity.”
Bill Gates talked about ‘doing vaccines right’ in his Ted Talk a few years before Covid.
Yes these people are that evil.
“AARON SIRI
Managing Partner
Siri & Glimstad LLP”
“Siri & Glimstad LLP is a law firm devoted solely to representing victims of vaccine injuries.”
https://www.nationalvaccineinjurylawyer.com/about/
The medical community were the ones doing the duping.
US educational systems very early adopted Wilhelm Wundt's emotional bases for childhood conditioning. It's easy to reinforce the response to fear as a flight into the arms of government to a population raised in a public education system pitching positive reinforcement.
Trump should have killed the EUA in writing because of the existence of effective multi-drug treatments, but he didn't because the public bleating drowned him out while the bureaucracy ignored him. He just didn't command the technical facts and is to a degree germ phobic. It's on him.
Didier Raoult's early work should have been sufficient to establish the existence of an effective treatment, but the FDA came up with a way to test hydroxychloroquine as a single drug treatment absent zinc, Vitamins C & D, and azithromycin in order to cast doubt upon its efficacy. In their defense, (according to Peter McCullough) muti-drug studies take about two years which never would have withstood said public bleating.
They get paid for how many they administer, and bonuses for hitting various numbers. There was/is financial incentive for them to administer as many as possible. Major conflict of interest.
Doctors are regular human beings with foibles and flaws and moral and ethical failings, personal and profesional. Same with nurses. Same with every healthcare worker. They have wrong ideas. They make mistakes and errors.
Everyone needs to stop putting them on pedestals and believing their word is the word of god.
“the medical community has arguably been duped into believing that vaccines are unequivocally safe.”
Define medical community
It was rigorously tested
On us
That's terrirble!
Only law firms devoted solely to representing manufacturers of vaccines should be allowed to represent anybody!
And they get a large charge out of telling you the agenda right up front: "Eco-Health" Alliance indeed.
These power freaks have believed in the population control agenda since the late Nineteenth Century. Yet I have proven that their thesis is technically wrong. They believe that to "save Nature" will require that people do less "damage" to the environment as if any of them have done any hands-on environmental management with which to establish that lazy assertion. I have shown that we don't have the labor available to keep native biodiversity alive and reproducing when inundating native plant systems Indians originally managed with a high-rate-of-disturbance against the combination of exotic species introductions and uninterrupted vegetative succession. People were a source of native biodiversity, as their survival depended upon it absolutely. Managed disturbance was the key.
"Unfortunately, while Dr. Zervos and Dr. Lamerato affirmed the study was well designed, executed, and worthy of publication, they would not submit it for publication because, among other reasons, Dr. Lamerato said she did not want to make doctors uncomfortable, and Dr. Zervos said he did not want to lose his job at Henry Ford."
"the study isolated 18,468 children in the Henry Ford medical system who were enrolled in that system from birth. This meant that the data captured all medical encounters from birth until disenrollment, including any vaccines each child received and the medical conditions they were coded for. Among these 18,468 children, 1,957 had no exposure to vaccination (meaning zero vaccines) and 16,511 had received at least one vaccine during their enrollment, with various levels of exposure."
"To be included in the study, a participant had to be “born and enrolled in HAP for > 60 days between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2016 with HFHS designated as their primary care system.”
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Siri-Testimony-1.pdf
“ but he didn’t because the public bleating drowned him out while the bureaucracy ignored him.”
Anyone could see that. It’s still true. The whole stadium at forest hills last week booed him at the tennis finals
He is the president of the US. People don’t understand how this country works. He is running the country
I don’t listen to him for medical advice. That’s not his job. He has the NIH, The CDC, the FDA, the AMA telling him, the country and all authorities that the vaccine is good and necessary
That group is terrible on this and on medicine. I ignore them. I know he got drowned out. It’s why he was on twitter and now truth
I don’t need him to tell me they’re not interested in our health. That’s no new. And what was he going to do tell a booing nation what to do? He did. They didn’t listen
“He just didn’t command the technical facts and is to a degree germ phobic. It’s on him.”
That’s just throwing blame at him. I hear it all the time. The people I know who did not get the shot listen to him. They all trust him. The ones who did get it, hate him. All of them. They don’t listen to him
It is BS you’re peddling. No sale
You’re right.
We must be content to rely on vaccine manufacturers and law firms devoted solely to representing vaccine manufacturers to investigate themselves and let us know of any adverse effects.
What could possibly go wrong?
A side track:
Get your Ivermectin while you can. Over the past two years the price has almost tripled….and I had a pharmacy in Tennessee ( no prescription needed to buy) tell me at the current rate ( since they passed the law no prescription needed in Tennessee) they expect shortages of Ivermectin.
I find this true. I used to buy my Ivermectin from India, the Canadian company that sold the Indian Ivermectin now says “ not available “. Stock up before the next pandemic hoax comes our way.
“In the United States, it is estimated that up to 9% of dogs are affected by at least one type of asthma.
“In the UK, a study was done to determine the prevalence of asthma in dogs and found that nearly 10% of dogs are affected by at least one type of asthma.”
“Many of these symptoms can be related to a compromised immune system resulting from either chronic malnourishment or recent vaccination.”
“Underlying genetic predisposition can be tested for by a simple blood test.”
“Dogs that are prone to asthma are typically the smaller breeds, such as the Bichon Frise, Cocker Spaniels, and Yorkies.”
https://petsmartgo.com/can-dog-have-asthma/
Accountability comes with the job. You can explain it away all you like.
I don’t listen to him for medical advice. That’s not his job.
The Federal government has no Constitutional power to control medical practice. Had we real Federalism, these problems would have been exposed far sooner.
And what was he going to do tell a booing nation what to do? He did. They didn’t listen.
Oh yes they did, and what they heard is that he wasn't competent to assess the technical facts. That may not be fair, but it was what the public was expecting.
The people I know who did not get the shot listen to him. They all trust him. The ones who did get it, hate him. All of them. They don’t listen to him.
I didn't get the jab because I knew better. I also knew masks were counterproductive. Neither was a matter of trust; both were matters of data, not trust. Didier Raoult's early data were all Trump needed to know the multidrug treatment worked because Raoult did actual counts of viral particles with a SEM. The inefficacy of masking was proven early on with particle counts by clean room engineers at Waterloo University and with field trials at Camp Pendleton.
Trump didn't know enough to know he was being sold a line of crap. He made the decision to let the EUA go while taking credit for Warp Speed. It's on him because he accepted that the public are accustomed to the Feds wielding those unconstitutional powers. He could have denied the EUA. He could have listened to the doctors behind the Great Barrington Declaration. He didn't. His technical judgment (for which he is accountable however illegitimately) is not trustworthy. It may not be reasonable to expect it, but your BS can't change the facts.
It's $1.00 a tablet already.
https://www.amazon.com/Unipomme-Ivermectin-Tablets-Person-Purity/dp/B0FLK7WVY3/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.