To: E. Pluribus Unum
If I were young and making choices, I would be willing to take vaccines for polio and smallpox. That’s it.
2 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:46:42 AM PDT by 
ClearCase_guy
(Society has no reward for following the rules any more)
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think it bans the “forcing” of vaccines ...
3 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:47:48 AM PDT by 
bankwalker
(Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Headline: “Ban vaccines”
Article: “Eliminate vaccine mandates”.
Big difference.
4 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:48:22 AM PDT by 
Signalman
(When your enemy is digging himself a hole, don't take away his shovel.)
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Banning vaccines is very different from banning vaccine mandates.
5 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:48:51 AM PDT by 
coloradan
(They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media.  It's what they do. )
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The vaccines are mostly to mitigate discomfort very few like the polio vaccine.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Banning”? Or not making them mandatory.
8 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:50:50 AM PDT by 
rktman
(Destroy America from within? On hold!  Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉!  🇮🇱👍! Winning currently!)
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
During the early days of the Covid not-a-vaccine I kept thinking about that people should be able to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Informed decisions were not possible because most of the medical profession as well as the government were lying to us.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
When they changed the definition of “vaccine” to accommodate the clot shot, peoples’ faith in ALL the products stared becoming doubtful.
Like everything else these godless, communist basstids touch, they destroy.
10 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:53:09 AM PDT by 
lgjhn23
("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Lapado leapt right over the scientific jargon and even the legality of mandates, and grabbed the issue of morality.
In essence, he argued it is ‘wrong’ —immoral— to force a child to take an injected substance that their parents don’t want.
Yeah, what he said.
11 posted on 
09/06/2025 11:54:24 AM PDT by 
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Options and not mandates ... why that is even controversial in the United States of America escapes me. Even more infuriating is mandating shots for babies who can't even verbalize what the side-effects of the shots are. I 100% support eliminating mandates as to what goes "into" your body. I have no problem with mandates on what goes "on" your body, like dress codes. But what goes inside is my decision, for me and for my minor children, and any one who tries to withhold information or to otherwise intentionally deceive me in that decision making is a criminal.
14 posted on 
09/06/2025 12:08:58 PM PDT by 
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
 
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They are not “banning” vaccines. They are making them voluntary.
Headline writers are stupid.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson