Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

“This is a complete fallacy, weather versus climate. It is one and the same,” said Lars Peter Riishojgaard, director of the Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center at the University of Maryland.

Not true.

We have been told over and over again by our DEI scientific betters that hot weather is climate and cold weather is just weather. 🤡

1 posted on 09/01/2025 3:01:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

It doesnt take a genius to figure out the weather, you go outside, its hot, you go outside, its raining, see that simple :-)


2 posted on 09/01/2025 3:04:19 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What a laugher. I am sure that these contracts are bloated AF. Plenty of services are available.


3 posted on 09/01/2025 3:05:16 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

so they admit climate is just weather ,LOL Farmers Almanac


4 posted on 09/01/2025 3:07:19 PM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I installed 4 weather apps. None of them are accurate. They say no rain while it’s raining, rain when it’s not. They can’t even agree on the temperature. Sometimes up to a 10 degree difference.

I rely mostly on my weather rock.


5 posted on 09/01/2025 3:07:58 PM PDT by Dutch Boy (The only thing worse than having something taken from you is to have it returned broken. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They are accurate 5% of the time now. How much will it go down?


6 posted on 09/01/2025 3:07:59 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They still can’t accurately predict three or four days from now, let alone a week or two.

I am unable to find a search result for the inaccurate call from the Weather Channel that cause expensive evacuation and shutdowns of stores and restaurants for a big storm that never arrived. People were chanting “Where’s the storm? Where’s the storm” and the headquarters made a call about the reporters and crew “Get them out of there. Now.”


7 posted on 09/01/2025 3:08:26 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Robert Heinlein onde wrote about the difference.

“People move somewhere for the climate, but when they get there they get weather.” [paraphrased]


8 posted on 09/01/2025 3:08:49 PM PDT by normbal (normbal. Non-native Tennessean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We will go bankrupt from superfluous spending but at least we’ll have idiots giving us dubious weather information. What a deal!!!!


9 posted on 09/01/2025 3:09:31 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NOAA got into the business of generating data that the climate alarmists use to beat us over the head with.


10 posted on 09/01/2025 3:11:38 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
But scientists said there is no such division between weather and climate.

I've been told for years that climate isn't the weather. Which is it? $cience.

11 posted on 09/01/2025 3:12:33 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I sure hope they don’t get rid of Kleinsassar, that dude has actually been right about the weather forecast here once or twice.


12 posted on 09/01/2025 3:13:18 PM PDT by kawhill ("Time will say nothing but I told you so." Auden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The idea that they can actually measure the co2 in the atmosphere is amusing......and know that it is the SOLE factor effecting climate is absurd....and that man is responsible for that number....is ridiculous.

That's not science....it's projection.

13 posted on 09/01/2025 3:17:37 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Utter nonsense, which is exactly what any normally intelligent and knowledgeable person would clearly understand.


14 posted on 09/01/2025 3:18:57 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (President Trump is America's long-awaited SUPREME Commander in Chief. Deus Hoc Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

NASA has never produced a cost effective weather satellite.


16 posted on 09/01/2025 3:24:40 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If I were to use the vocabulary and phraseology of these “scientists” in my job, I would be unemployed.

Maybe

Perhaps

Chance of

Partly

I would have no “chance of” a paycheck.

PS - I have lived in places where the “weather report” simply interchanged “partly sunny” and “partly cloudy” for WEEKS. When the clouds did not burn off, they “amended” the nighttime report to something close to: “today’s clouds were thicker than expected.”


17 posted on 09/01/2025 3:26:39 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How can we survive with only 15,000 weather satellites?


19 posted on 09/01/2025 3:31:18 PM PDT by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She blinded me with science


21 posted on 09/01/2025 3:38:11 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

the could cut the budget to 1 dollar and the models would still blame global warming on capitalism, cars, oil, coal, and people and the model would still predict denver under water in a few years, but always a few years from whatever year it is.


26 posted on 09/01/2025 3:52:40 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Liars at the Washington Post weigh in with more lies...


27 posted on 09/01/2025 3:57:48 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s all BS. Tracking CO2 adds nothing to weather prediction.


29 posted on 09/01/2025 4:10:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (The Golden Age of MAGA is upon us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson