What is a “cis man”?
Yeah, I myself was asking Grok about this, and Grok decided it was time to give me a little sermon about trans being victims more often than perps, and that cis men composed the greatest number of mass shooters. But then I said to Grok, but compared to the PERCENTAGE of the population of each group how does it stack up? That was when Grok had to admit that there was something amiss. But it came back one more time to mention that trans are more often victims than perps.
A Rooter Reuter “Fact Check”. ROTFL! Funny stuff.
I refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the pronoun “cis”, and will immediately dismiss anyone using it in a conversation with me.
Therefore, ipso facto, all trannies are loving, kind people, despite the fact that when they look down, they hate what they see.
Straw man argument through and through.
No one is arguing that the majority of mass shooters are the mentally disordered with gender dysphoria, as the headline implies.
What is obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together, is that an inordinate number of mass shootings are being perpetrated by this group.
I know a few FReepers often post a list of mass shooters, the majority of whom are disordered sex-pretenders.
You never heard of all this transgender crap prior to the Obergefell decision. It really did open a gigantic can of worms, and not just in the USA but worldwide.
The depraved homosexual movement is what started all this. There is no fetish that those freaks won’t approve of. Just look at what that disgusting NAMBLA association is all about. Their members are filthy degenerate cretins.
Rick Santorum warned about this. No we are here.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Okay, now let’s do percentage of population. Out of the population of people who are self-identifying as trans, what is the percentage of mass shooters as opposed to the percentage of those who don’t identify as trans?
“Transgender” is the new, trendy place for people with mental issues to identify.
The majority of mass shooters are young black gang bangers.
The media will now compare the remarkable string of tranny public anonymous mass shootings to turf wars among inner city black drug gangs, so as to bury the fact that of Public Mass Shootings, over 4% have been committed by Trannies.
See here from Grok, in the middle of my conversation with it in which I’m attempting to have Grok remove its political bias:
“To clarify, my original statement noted that the four mass shootings linked to transgender or non-binary individuals represent less than 0.1% of over 4,100 mass shootings since 2018, per the Gun Violence Archive (GVA). You’re referencing the 4% figure from the search context, which likely relates to public mass shootings (random, non-gang, non-domestic) as a subset of all mass shootings. Let’s break this down directly.
The GVA defines a mass shooting as an incident with four or more people shot (injured or killed), excluding the shooter, totaling over 4,100 incidents from 2018 to 2025. The 4% figure from a 2019 Rockefeller Institute study (web:15) suggests that public mass shootings (not tied to gang activity, domestic violence, or other crimes) make up about 4% of this total, roughly 164 incidents since 2018 (4% of 4,100).
The four incidents involving transgender or non-binary individuals (Aberdeen 2018, Denver 2019, Nashville 2023, Minneapolis 2025) are a subset of all mass shootings, not just the 4% public mass shootings. However, if we compare these four incidents to the estimated 164 public mass shootings, the proportion is approximately 4/164 = 2.44%, not 0.1%. My original 0.1% (4/4,100) was based on all mass shootings, not the narrower public mass shooting category.
To address your claim of a “factor of 25”:
• 2.44% (4/164, public mass shootings) ÷ 0.1% (4/4,100, all mass shootings) = 24.4, meaning the proportion is indeed about 24-25 times higher when comparing to public mass shootings only.
So, yes, you’re correct that using the 4% public mass shooting subset as the denominator makes the proportion (2.44%) significantly higher than 0.1%, by a factor of roughly 25. The 0.1% figure is accurate for all mass shootings but understates the proportion relative to public mass shootings specifically. Thanks for pointing out the need for this clarification.”
Fact check from a legacy media source = Attempt to move the narrative away from a conservative theme, in this case the high percentage of mass murderers being gender confused individuals.
We ARE NOT asserting that Trannies make up the MAJORITY of mass shooters.
We ARE asserting that Trannies are GROSSLY OVERREPRESENTED versus their population.
Stuff it, Rooters, you f****g liars.
Only because they also count as ‘mass shootings’ all of the ghetto nonsense, cartel mayhem, or family traumas that are a weekly occurrence in big cities, and never even make the national news.
The above sorts of shootings don’t target public places with victims who have no connection with the shooter. This space is dominated by the trans- or Allah-addled mentally ill.
That’s a lot of mass shooting by a group that represents .7% of the population.
how to lie with statistics:
contrast the number of mass murderers who are members of a very small group
to the number of mass murderers who are members of a very large group
WITHOUT adjusting for the size of the group
The lying media shows again that it is the lying media.
It is doubtful that given the political control that the bizarre Democrats have over urban areas and the constitutional restraints that exist on well meaning law enforcement, that there will be any definitive action taken to protect rational, decent people from violent transgenders and other crazies. Time has come for the decent to protect themselves. Would it be illegal to compile a list of known transgenders and then crossmatch with gun sales or licenses made by that group? Buying a gun requires that the purchaser be identified. Is that data available to the public? Would like to know who are the armed transgenders in my locale.