Posted on 08/11/2025 11:58:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
It was six months ago that Selin Celikoyar bought her last tampon and switched to a reusable menstrual disc.
“I had already been wary of tampons from an environmental perspective and also from a biological perspective. I felt that they were very wasteful and expensive to consistently keep buying,” she said.
The flexible discs and other reusable menstrual products are gaining traction as alternatives to the billions of single-use pads and tampons that get tossed into landfills every year. Products such as the discs, silicone cups and period underwear can be reused for years, so they’re cost-effective and long-lasting in addition to helping people reduce waste. The popularity of the reusable alternatives has grown since the pandemic, when it was easier to experiment with period products in the privacy of a home bathroom, according to women’s health experts.
Celikoyar said she used tampons and pads for years because those are the options she grew up knowing about. But when she saw her friend make the switch to a menstrual disc, she decided to try it too.
“The experience has been such a game changer,” she said.
About 12 billion disposable pads and 7 billion tampons go into U.S. landfills every year, according to Dr. Luwam Semere, chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara. Pads are mostly plastic. Once they’re in the landfill, they take up to 800 years to degrade, according to the National Institutes of Health.
Single-use pads and tampons are by far the most popular period products. Women’s health expert Dr. Navya Mysore said that’s not because they’re better, they’re just usually the first options kids are shown.
“It was often...”
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
Anything to save money....🤮🤮🤮
That should save Minnesota billions of dollars every year in the mens rooms in the state.
Wayyyy TMI
DO I MAKE A SPECIAL WASH CYCLE FOR THOSE ITEMS?
I CERTAINLY DO NOT WISH TO WASH THEM WITH OTHER CLOTHES !!!
YUK !!
Yeah, well sorry it happened.
I did, both diapers and feminine products because hubby and I were being super frugal, trying to save money. No other “agenda”. There are sanitary ways to do this with buckets filled bleach water until laundry every other day and a separate cycle.
No one died, no stench, just 1-2 more extra laundry loads for me each week.
Not everyone who does reusable has some liberal agenda, for us it was about money plain and simple.
That said, thank God for menopause 😅
But then there’s this:
“What the 1993 study didn’t take into account, DeVore says, is the use of potentially harmful chemicals to bleach disposable diapers and enhance their super-absorbent capabilities.
Those of us who have recently changed an infant may have noticed a gel-like substance in the diaper that definitely didn’t come from the baby. That gel is a result of the sodium polyacrylate crystals, a superabsorbent polymer (SAP) that is used in disposable diapers for absorbency. Sodium polyacrylate can hold up to 300 times its weight in water and to date, no studies exist as to whether it is dangerous to children when absorbed through the skin. However, some experts have pointed to the SAPs in tampons as the possible cause of toxic shock syndrome, so some consumers are wary.
Of greater concern to many is the presence of dioxin, a highly toxic carcinogen and endocrine disruptor, in disposable diapers. Dioxin is a byproduct of the chlorine bleaching process, and the Archives of Disease in Childhood reports that trace amounts of dioxin are present on disposables. Some diaper services use chlorine bleach to whiten their cloth diapers, but conscientious consumers can ask questions to avoid those services.
A study published in late 1999 by Anderson Laboratories found that lab mice exposed to various brands of disposable diapers experienced asthma-like symptoms, as well as eye, nose, and throat irritation. Cloth diapers did not cause respiratory symptoms.
Dr. Rosalind Anderson, lead author of the report, says chemicals like xylene and ethylbenzene, suspected endocrine, neuro-, and respiratory toxins; styrene, a suspected carcinogen and respiratory toxin; and ispropylene, a suspected neurotoxin; were among those released from the disposable diapers. Anderson notes that human surveys will be needed to determine how important the link between diapers and asthma is to infants and asthmatic parents, but parents should be cautious.
In addition, a 2001 UK study published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood suggests that infant boys who wear disposable diapers could experience impaired fertility as adults. The researchers found that the temperature of the scrotum was almost 2oF higher in boys who wore disposables diapers rather than cloth. This temperature increase, they say, may negatively impact future fertility. Experts agree that disposables do keep babies warmer because of the plastic and insulation, but the link to infertility has not been further studied.
In short, there may be reasons to be concerned about the health effects of disposables, though we’re still years away from hard evidence that can tell us once and for all how serious these concerns are.”
https://www.greenamerica.org/green-living/get-better-diapers
Yes. I can understand that diaper rash would be a huge problem.
My next door neighbor at the marina told me she started using a reuseable cup. I said....that’s gross, then laughed at her. She was kind of one of those save the body from all the toxic crap gals. Used some weird deodorant. Started a compost thing at the police dept where she worked. I used to just laugh at her.
On the downside, using them delays toilet training for many children. They absorb so much that the child can't perceive discomfort until they are literally sopping. I babysat a four-year-old who was still in pull-ups. And nursery school teachers are complaining.
Oye! 😧
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.