Posted on 07/24/2025 6:30:16 PM PDT by Racketeer
🚨 WATCH: Candace Owens just poured gasoline on the Macron lawsuit, straight-up telling Brigitte, “You were born a man and you’ll die a man… See you in court.”
She’s pledging to fight “on behalf of the entire world,” daring the French First Family to drag this into discovery.
“Owens thinks the moon landings were faked, too.”
And for a while Candace was saying that, not only is Brigette a man, but she/he is Macron’s own father! That story didn’t last long.
That’s funny stuff, right there!
Several children points to gene sharing.
...had 3 children.
Someone had 3 children, possibly one of the other siblings. It wouldn't be the first time someone took ownership of a child that wasn't theirs.
So all of her children are fake?
They may not be her children and no, they're not "fake" - they might just be someone else's.
For example, Jack Nicholson grew up believing he had a sister only to have researchers uncover the truth (when he was 37 years old) that his sister was actually his mother and that his father was still alive.
https://www.unilad.com/celebrity/news/jack-nicholson-discovered-sister-mom-330003-20250718
Please see your FRmail! :-)
All I did was state the arguement being used. I did the translation, that is all I did.
I’m also not above believing that there are things that the world will do to push the world away from God. Do you think this is an innocent world?
Stop trying to argue with me over what is not an argument with me. You seem to like starting arguments with people who are not creating arguements, but explaining why people do what they do.
What is that?
BS!
SPOT ON!
I don’t think Mrs. Macron is required to prove her sex in order to show she has been defamed by Ms. Owens.
Excellent summation.
There are photos of the brother and sister TOGETHER ( no double exposure! ) over many decades!
Her brother is a private person, so IF he has died or chosen to "go missing" ( i.e. get out of the public's view ) it's understandable.
And as far as MY "research", I'll put my expertise and knowledge against yours any day of the week and twice on Sunday and you'd lose BIGLY!
Just the FORK in that TREE needs to be examined, I believe.
Macron is already “weak”; there’sno need to go after his wife. Igen?
Maybe, but it's hard tell among the French.
What’s true?
Then what's the defamation?
Mrs. Macron WILL NEVER BE TOLD BY A COURT TO SUBMIT DNA TO PROVE HER SEX. That is not necessary to show she has been defamed by C. Owens.
Now if she decides to qualify for the Olympics that would be a different matter depending on the sport.
Well played!
🇭🇺
See post 60 - if it’s the same suit, Macron actually won; but it was overturned and she has appealed again. (I haven’t found any info on why it was overturnedl but - one of the defendants was apparently some kind of ‘spiritual medium’!
The nuts seem to be out in force against Mrs. Macron...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.