Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/17/2025 3:12:38 PM PDT by Beave Meister
Veteran political journalist Mark Halperin revealed on Thursday that “everyone” believes a blockbuster exposé about the relationship between President Donald Trump and the late sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein is about to drop.
“One of the points of this platform, in the age of transparency, is to narrow the gap between elites like Dan [Turrentine], and Sean [Spicer], and the people like the 2WAY community and myself. So let me share something with you that “everyone,” I say that in air quotes, everyone I know knows hasn’t been publicly reported. Everyone I know believes a major newspaper, one of the top three newspapers in the country, is about to publish a piece about President Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Okay? Everyone I know knows that. And people in the White House know that, too. When that story drops, if it drops today, and some people think it might, it could drive the day,” began Halperin before asking Turrentine and Spicer if they had heard about the story.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Nanzi Pelosi’s “wrap-up smear” in action. Let’s see how this plays out.
“If there was even a morsel of truth to this article it would have come out years ago with all the investigations, impeachments hearings, and everything else they threw at Trump trying to find any kind of dirt on him. What a bunch of BS.”
Stop making sense.
People get their egos hurt
The study of basic propaganda should be taught in high school along with history and civics. It goes way back. I first realized it while reading The Peloponnesian War with all the intrigues surrounding Alcibiades.
Will it be worse than the time Trump was a Russian agent ?
Teens are children. Teenager is just a development level of childhood.
I’ve heard on blind sites that he may have had a farm in Mexico, where he had children birthed and then sold.
not enough
Grok
@grok
·
Replying to
@VerityKye
and
@AllbrightNFL
“Birthday card gate” likely refers to a 2000 birthday card from Trump to Epstein, revealed in court docs, wishing him well with a note on their friendship. It’s resurfaced amid WSJ’s probe into Trump-Epstein ties, fueling White House backlash. Details remain speculative without the full story.
I agree, no one cares about a dumb birthday card.
What I am interested in is who paid Epstein. Is there an actual money trail that links back to the disgusting pedophiles? If so, why aren’t the names being made public?
The actual constitutional limit of a president's time in office is actually 10yrs.
Trump can do all the rough stuff up until the 2 year point of his term and then resign and turn it to Vance.
Vance can serve until the next election and then Trump can run again... this brings Trump's enormous electability to the next election :-)
Trump's time serving would be
2016 - 2020 4 years
2024 - 2026 2 years
2028 - 2032 4 years
total of 10 years
Then Vance
2026 - 2028 2 years
2032 - 2036 4 years
2036 - 2040 4 years
These rules were adopted to allow for a VP who has to take over the presidency to serve the remainder of the term and then run again twice so long as his first short term does not exceed two years.
So would Mediate come out with rumors if this was against a democrat?
I know he had this: https://www.koat.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-documents-released-new-mexico-ranch/46334470
Also the Manhattan brownstone and a place in Miami. Of course, the island. And this Paris apartment: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/24/french-police-search-jeffrey-epstein-paris-apartment
A Mexican baby ranch wouldn’t surprise me.
Bill clinton used the oval office with an 18 yr old female.
Get this.. used the OVAL OFFICE with an 18 yr old...
!!!!!!
Grok
@grok
·
Replying to
@prime_reeves
and
@NoLieWithBTC
No, this claim is unsubstantiated. Extensive searches across diverse sources reveal no evidence of the White House suppressing a specific WSJ story on Trump’s Epstein ties, nor Trump personally calling to block it. It’s amid broader Epstein file controversies, but WSJ has published related articles freely.
The evidence used to indict Ghislaine Maxwell is currently locked up pending her appeal(s). Note hear, the evidence allowed in a grand jury is much more broad that what was allowed at her trial. Would someone risk doctoring that evidence?
Then there’s the evidence Pam Blondie supposedly obtained from the prosecution in the Southern District of New York where Jim Comey’s daughter in a prosecutor. Would someone doctor that evidence? For sure. Possibly just by adding subterfuge.
At this point is there a notable difference between these two sets of evidence? Probably!
So, what to do now? You tell me.
RATS might have created something new. Would be easy enough.
And Trump voters would vote for a Democrat?? Don’t think so!
People keep stating this like it’s a fact. It’s an Ad Ignorantium fallacy. The same logic applies to Trump not leaking or otherwise deploying Epstein goods on the Democrats in his first term. Could have been stuff they didn’t know about for whatever reason. Could have been stuff they did know but feared collateral damage to their own interests.
I saw a deposition linked off Cat Turds Telegram page involving a teen hooker. It’s right up there with the pissing Russian hookers in the Steele dossier. Get ready, it’s coming. Can’t wait to hear the Lamentations and flagellations of the pearl clutchers of FR.
These are the same corrupt people working with the same corrupt CIA and DOJ who have tampered with the Epstein files and then truly unthinking people believe this administration is covering up the Epstein files.
It is discouraging but not too surprising to witness - a legion of thick headed and easily manipulated citizens.
A we’ll see a reflection of the aforementioned in the posts replies on this article.
Dimwits, to say the least.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.