Posted on 07/08/2025 7:12:52 AM PDT by Racketeer
Mike Benz is asking the right questions..
I’d say that the women who have been brave enough to testify (one of them now dead) are more than inuendo. Then there’s that reporter who lamented that her station had all of the evidence, had everything, and the big bosses killed the story.
Epstein was an AI creation.
The real Epstein files are at a Goodwill center in Omaha .
Innuendos that there is a cover up, versus evidence that there is a coverup.
The bad guys do not play fair.
First they destroy evidence and then they say “see there is no evidence”.
Nondisclosure of secrets is not a coverup.
The age of people having the internet and the belief they know and have a right to know everything is the age of ignorance. Governments have secrets.
People have no rights to know government secrets
It is reasonable to debate the benefits and costs of government secrecy.
Both sides have valid arguments.
“Innuendos that there is a cover up, versus evidence that there is a coverup.”
Evidence of a cover-up occurs when further investigation is stopped and/or case is closed.
The files were seized and then stored, and then disappeared by the SDNY.
I suspect that some of the truth will come out just before the next election. There’s gamesmanship afoot here!
I understand "transparency" is not absolute and, realistically, cannot be applied to everything in government, but in a free society I should think that alleged felonious criminal activity by elected officials must be exposed lest these powerful people in positions of authority are not subject to the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment a presumption which is not beyond the realm of possibility in "modern" American politics).
“Evidence of a cover-up occurs when further investigation is stopped and/or case is closed.”
No. That is an innuendo, because it assumes there is evidence that the case should not have been closed; yet what it presented is not such evidence, but innuendo.
If the CIA has a basement 10 levels deep to hide all their super secret stuff, then Epstein’s is on the ll1th lever down there, never to be seen or read again.
Or was it first come, first served? 🤔
Yeah, but they were Tonka trucks.
“I was thinking they’d operate on him. Wait a few months and then present him to the world as a woman-naked. What would all the muzzles think?”
They wouldn’t be able to tell, he would in his burka.
I agree with you.
There is zero evidence of any wrongdoing.
It is great that this matter is being dropped.
In fact Bondi and Kash should take a three year vacation since they have no evidence of any wrongdoing by anybody!
Agreed. There is a Russian proverb, "One-hundred rabbits do not make a horse", meaning, among other things, that no amount of suspicion equals proof.
Bull!!!!
There are so many higher up’s, connected types, Holywood, politicians, business mogels, + probably spouses of any involved in this, (and for a long time), that there was NO WAY this info was going to EVER come out!
“There are so many higher up’s, connected types, Holywood, politicians, business mogels, + probably spouses of any involved in this,”
Eostein was very prolific in making high profile connections.
The suspicion is that they all were involved with or knew about his illicit relations with minors.
People think there is evidence that that is true.
And people assume that lack of revelations that that is true amounts to a coverup.
That suspicion is not evidence.
This rings as ‘very possible’...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.