Posted on 07/02/2025 4:12:56 AM PDT by MtnClimber
As frustrating as many of the Supreme Court’s decisions have been of late, in the past week or two, they seem to have come to their senses.
That they finally put a stop to the unconstitutional intervention, intrusion into the purview of the executive branch’s powers, and stopped those far-left activist judges from kneecapping the president (Trump vs. Casa).
They also ruled that no state can allow the genital mutilation of minor children (US v. Skrmetti).
That this issue got this far is a sad commentary on the state of our nation.
And in a third victory, the Court ruled that parents may opt out of the LGBT grooming/indoctrination that has been going on in our schools, public and private, since the Obama administration and escalated under Biden’s ill-fated regime (Mahmoud v. Taylor).
Fourth, the Court decided that porn sites must require age identification; a no-brainer one would think (FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., ET AL. v. PAXTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS).
But, in each case, the three leftist women on the court voted the wrong way. They voted for activist judges superseding the president. They voted against banning the mutilation of minor children, against children as young as kindergarten being able to escape LGBT indoctrination. And they voted against porn sites requiring those attempting access them reveal their age.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan do not have children; Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has two daughters.
Not being a parent, however, should not render a person devoid of common sense when it comes to protecting the innocence of children.
And yet, how else to explain the votes of Sotomayor and Kagan beyond the fact that they have no experience with or affection for the youngest among us?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Leftists are suffering from severe mental disorders.
BTTT
How does one read this article without all those menacing ads? I thought I had turned those off on my iPhone settings. Maybe not?
You mean....”the girls”...well, I’m not a biologist...but “the girls” are a good guess.
Brave browser.
+1 for Brave browser
“Not being a parent, however, should not render a person devoid of common sense when it comes to protecting the innocence of children.”
Statistically it does, although there are many exceptions (I learned of 2 more exceptions in my circle last month). Probably the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT of the Left has been to convince many millions of White women to NOT have kids.
They really aren’t very SMART!! Embarrassing!
When speaking of the three justices it has become clear that they are activists. They have no intention on blind justice. They are driven by their activism and have no interest in our Constitutional Republic. To title them as Associate Justice is a lie at this point. They should always be referred to as Activist Justice because they have no intention of upholding the law. They have every intention of interpreting the law through activism. In other words make the law do what they want it to do. Hopefully each of the rulings going forward the three can be skewered in the writings of the ruling by the majority. Shame them so the history books can dutifully record their activism and their love for judicial tyranny.
Kagan’s argument on the porn case was pretty good. I personally agreed with the majority decision but think they should have reached it a different way.
I’ve always had a good impression of Elena Kagan. Figured she was liberal in the vein of a traditional Democrat from the days of yore - and not the woke-extreme sense.
Yes the court shouldn’t be partisan and it’s important to take note and applaud when justices are simply doing the work of the law.
I think it is the new pope. He does not seem to be as lefty as the old one, and Amy the pope’s handmaiden has fallen in line.
Yes, she is the smartest of the 3, not surprisingly, given her ethnicity.
Really? Genital mutilation of children should not be legal anywhere. But I would've thought the ruling only applied to Tennessee where the lawsuit came from.
Any justices retiring? I’d like Alito and Thomas to retire before 2026. I know they are the best. But they are the oldest. I want two superior justices in their 40’s as replacement. We can never be in the position of an RBG being replaced by democrats. We should learn and heed that lesson.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.