Posted on 05/23/2025 6:42:28 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
She is definitely not ready for her close-up.
A stylish woman in heels and a leather jacket used scissors to stab an amateur photographer who accidently captured an image of her as he took photos in the West Village, cops said.
The sunglasses and dress-wearing brunette flew into a Britney Spears-level paparazzi rage on Varick Street near West Houston Street around 4:20 p.m. May 5 as the 36-year-old victim was out shooting images for social media.
First, she slugged him on his shoulder — before flashing a pair of scissors and stabbing him in the back, police said.
The woman then stormed off, heading south on Varick Street and entering the Houston Street subway station, cops said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Just checked.
Still no arrest.
I’m betting LE knows who she is...
Sister of Edward?
I’m not sure that’s a woman.
Maybe we found a wife for Laz.
She’d probably take a stab at him....
“Was she RUNNING with those scissors?”
She was heading for the subway. Now we know why she was carrying scissors, and she was in “defense-mode”.
Sure she wasn’t a redhead?
At least he got her picture first.
Folks need to ignore the ages-old BS from police depts and commie trash politicos — protect yourself.
Someone pushes or strikes you, pop them in the nose. That was the only fix, ONLY, for school yard bullies. And, these arseholes who attack others with impunity never grew up.
Sharpest version of the Hot/Crazy matrix I’ve seen (except it left off that odd region defined by 8-to-10 Hot / 0-to-4 Crazy).
Sounds like 2nd Amendment would be justified here,after all scissors are a deadly weapon, not shoot to kill but shoot to disarm or threaten to shoot to disarm.
R.B.F.
That’s a man, baby!
More like RDF.
resting dude face.
"Woman", you say?
no kidding
You always shoot to kill.
One, the legal justification for any shooting is the same. You must be in fear of your life or severe bodily injury.
Two, you are the main witness.
I get a North Korean or CCP vibe from her. The cameraman was seen as a threat and she took what she considered defensive action.
She’s likely from a repressed society where ppl are not allowed to freely photograph. Because only spies and security forces use cameras and it’s to collect evidence and prosecute ppl.
Looks like a foreigner.
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.