Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Failure's not an option': Trump budget bill will be 'big' help for seniors, top House tax-writer says
Fox News ^ | 5/17/25 | Elizabeth Elkind

Posted on 05/17/2025 10:41:20 AM PDT by Libloather

EXCLUSIVE: The top tax-writer in the House of Representatives is arguing that President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" will be "big" for American taxpayers as well – including seniors.

House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., and other Republicans on the panel spent months negotiating behind closed doors on how to enact Trump's tax policies.

Among those is an added $4,000 deduction for Americans aged 65 or older. Seniors with income of less than $75,000 as single filers, and less than $150,000 as joint filers, would be eligible for the full deduction, which then would begin to phase out.

"So, that’s on top of their guaranteed deduction, and that’s per person . . . anyone who has total earnings of $75,000 a year or less is going to be made completely whole, so all the low-income and middle-income seniors on Social Security will be paying zero on Social Security in the long run," Smith told Fox News Digital, while adding of others, "most of them will be paying much less."

Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process, which lowers the Senate's threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51 for certain pieces of fiscal legislation, to advance a vast bill full of Trump's priorities on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt.

Because the House already operates under a simple majority, reconciliation allows the party in power to pass sweeping legislation while sidelining the other side, in this case, Democrats.

Trump has directed congressional Republicans to permanently extend his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), as well as implement new policies eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay and retirees' Social Security.

But the law that established the reconciliation process, the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, also specifically forbade direct changes to Social Security via the process.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: bill; budget; house; seniors; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Libloather

It might save someone $500. They aren’t even entertaining the no tax on social security that Trump wants. The GOP are no more interested in getting rid of the income tax than the Democrats are. 🙄


21 posted on 05/17/2025 12:05:36 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie
How about no child tax credit, no mortgage tax credit, no special tax exemption for SS….just a low flat income tax rate that everyone pays so we all have skin in the game but not much?

We can do that if we permanently trim the fat that DODGE found.

22 posted on 05/17/2025 12:27:46 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Squishey republicans cant cut the budget enough to give us all what Trump promised.


23 posted on 05/17/2025 1:22:52 PM PDT by reviled downesdad (Abortion is the genocide of people of color by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Where are the Spending Cuts?
What was the purpose of DOGE if GOP House and Senate won’t enact them?


24 posted on 05/17/2025 1:40:23 PM PDT by tennmountainman ( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRobr 12-2-2023 DITTO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Is Trump continues to overpromise and under deliver again.


25 posted on 05/17/2025 2:37:34 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Donald John Trump. First man to be Elected to the Presidency THREE times since FDR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Well, yes… Trump over promises, Republicans fail to deliver

They’d rather lose than lead.


26 posted on 05/17/2025 2:51:09 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie

“Another Hand Out to Boomers is not the way to a brighter future.”

Could you possibly explain how the tax bill is “another” hand out to Boomers?

When was the initial on? I am a boomer and have never had a hand out from the Federal government.


27 posted on 05/17/2025 3:44:06 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie

Young people eventually grow older and reach retirement age. Ending taxes on SS benefits would help younger generations, too.

You pay SS taxes your whole working life. And those SS taxes are not deductible, so you pay income tax on the SS taxes you pay.

When you finally reach retirement and receive SS benefits, you shouldn’t have to pay taxes again on the SS benefits.


28 posted on 05/17/2025 7:11:50 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson