Posted on 05/02/2025 4:28:20 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS)—the same technology which is powering the development of tailor-made medicines, cancer diagnostics, infectious disease tracking, and gene research—could become a prime target for hackers.
A study, published in IEEE Access, highlights growing concerns over how this powerful sequencing tool—if left unsecured—could be exploited for data breaches, privacy violations, and even future biothreats.
Led by Nasreen Anjum from the University of Portsmouth’s School of Computing, this is the first comprehensive research study of cyber-biosecurity threats across the entire NGS workflow.
NGS is a cornerstone of modern biotechnology, enabling rapid and cost-effective DNA and RNA sequencing that supports important advances in cancer research, drug development, agricultural innovation and forensic science.
The sequencing process within NGS workflow involves a series of complex, interdependent steps—from sample preparation and sequencing to data analysis and interpretation—each involving highly specialised instruments, technologies, software, and connected systems.
While the steps are essential for generating accurate results, they also open up multiple points of vulnerability. As many DNA datasets are openly accessible online, the study warns it is possible for cybercriminals to misuse the information for surveillance, manipulation, or malicious experimentation.
"Our work is a wake-up call. Protecting genomic data isn’t just about encryption - it’s about anticipating attacks that don’t yet exist. We need a paradigm shift in how we secure the future of precision medicine," said Anjum.
The research was carried out in collaboration with colleagues from the Department of Computer Science at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, the University of Gloucestershire’s Department of Cyber Security and Computing, Narjan University’s Department of Computer Science and Emerging Research Laboratory, and the Department of Microbiology at Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University.
Mahreen-Ul-Hassan, microbiologist and co-author from the Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, said: "Genomic data is one of the most personal forms of data we have. If compromised, the consequences go far beyond a typical data breach.”
The research team identified new and emerging methods that hackers and those with malicious intent could use to exploit or attack systems, such as synthetic DNA-encoded malware, AI-driven manipulation of genome data, and identity tracing through re-identification techniques. These threats go beyond typical data breaches, posing risks to individual privacy, scientific integrity, and national security.
“Despite its importance, cyber-biosecurity remains one of the most neglected and poorly understood research disciplines and is leaving a critical gap in global biosecurity. To make sure our DNA information stays safe and is used only for good, we’re urging more research and collaboration to find ways to keep this powerful technology secure," said Anjun. "Governments, regulatory bodies, funding agencies, and academic institutions must prioritise this field and invest in dedicated research, education, and policy development before it’s too late. Without coordinated action, genomic data could be exploited for surveillance, discrimination, or even bioterrorism. Current protections are fragmented, and vital collaboration between disciplines is lacking. Key to successful prevention will be interdisciplinary cooperation between computer scientists, bioinformaticians, biotechnologists, and security professionals - groups that rarely work together but must align. Our research lays the foundations for improving biosecurity by providing a single, clear list of all the possible threats in the entire next-generation sequencing process.”
The paper also recommends practical solutions, including secure sequencing protocols, encrypted storage, and AI-powered anomaly detection, creating a foundation for much stronger cyber-biosecurity.
The study was funded by the British Council’s UK-Saudi Challenge Fund and a Quality Related Research Grant from the University of Portsmouth.
Republished courtesy of University of Portsmouth
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
So there! Ha!
According to whom?
The Book of Enoch. Don’t tell me you’ve not read the story of Samyaza.
Please someone make sense of this headline? GMO is a thing and has been for a couple of decades. Does this mean that more people are joining the "Henny Penny" mental illness bandwagon? Does the use of the pejorative term "hacking" for a scientific procedure or process causes more risk?
Sounds like more fear porn to me.
Don't tell me that you didn't know that the Book of Enoch is not part of the King James Version of the Bible.
I never said it was. The Nifster wanted a reference and I gave it to him. What's the problem?
There is no problem actually, but there 1.18 billion Protestants all across the globe who have not read the Book of Enoch or would even give any credence to it, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that people haven’t heard of gene-splicing from Heaven.
Well, it wasn't exactly from Heaven. These were fallen angels wanting to change their DNA to be able to copulate with human women. I understand it isn't canon but everyone knew about in NT times. It was available and well read.
That was quite a stretch.
Watson and Crick completed their model, which is now accepted as the first correct model of the double helix of DNA. On 28 February 1953 Crick interrupted patrons' lunchtime at The Eagle pub in Cambridge, England to announce that he and Watson had "discovered the secret of life".That's only a month before I was born. Nobody had even heard of DNA until my lifetime. How could they have known about fallen angels wanting to change their DNA if nobody had even heard of it?
Well Bigg, I hate to break it to you but angels are super smart. Smarter than our supercomputers. And Watson and Crick has nothing to do with what happened thousands of years ago.
I never imagined that any version of the Bible mentioned Deoxyribonucleic Acid and fallen angels wanting to change their DNA, so no, I was not making a statement about the fallen angels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.