 |   |
| Send FReepmail if you want on/off FMH list | |
| The List of Ping Lists | |
Posted on 04/30/2025 7:04:30 PM PDT by Red Badger
Must. Have. One!
I WANT ONE!!!!
That’s the way I wanna die and not sedated in some forgotten rat infested nursing home.
Me too.
If it looses power, it will come down like a streamlined crowbar.
Looks very cool, but in this new era of Ai videos, I’m not convinced it’s real. If it is real, then I suspect the flight time is probably 10 minutes.🤣
“no spinnign propellers”
Any mention in there about jet blast and noise level?
Your neighbors might object as they did to your Ducati with factory race exhaust.
“I see room to improve this with retractable landing gear in an aerodynamic way.”
It would be hard to tell for sure without testing hands on, but it might actually need that extra lower drag for an optimum stability balance.
| |
| Send FReepmail if you want on/off FMH list | |
| The List of Ping Lists | |
Smells like vaporware...
No specs. No cost. No details at all.
Somebody on X said it was An AI fake..................
Looks like it’s supposed to be a vectored thrust turbine engine... but there’s no topside air intake, no idea where it’s store enough fuel to run for more than 2-3 minutes, etc...
What’s the old saying, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
"Somebody" is right. Nice AI rendering, but no way is it real.
Objection #1: Way too small for the power it would have to produce.
Objection #2: Some of the video was "shot" from a vantage point a few yards in front of the machine, while it's flying, requiring another flying machine. The subject is always dead center and stable while the background moves. Sorry, no, that's not possible.
AI. Nice AI, but definitely AI.
Agree with #1, though. No room for fuel.
Oh, d-uh, yep you're right, that would be how it is done.
I don't get where the "jet engine" is. Under the seat? If so, where's the air intake? Blowing enough air down and out to do lift and movement requires having a ton of air being sucked in. On the sides? Can't be the front or back, it would create horizontal acceleration.
Nah, I don't think so. And your comment about fuel is likewise on the mark.
So... “plausible” in that regard...
Other than the size of the airbike eliciting engineering related questions... It's the lighting on the terrain and trees that makes it seem like AI generation to me. It doesn’t look natural.
A drone could easily capture the entire flight.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Vertical flight is hideously inefficient and expensive. That thing has ZERO lift-generating surfaces on it, so it’s all thrust. Look at the trees beneath it swaying in the breeze of its downwash. Which means not only is it incredibly inefficient, there’s no back-up — except a parachute — if the engine poops the bed.
In such a small package, I can’t imagine it’s controlled by anything except a gimballing exhaust nozzle. Which means it’s also using computer-aided stability. You’re balanced by a computer on top of a column of thrust. Which makes the computer a single point of failure.
The good new is, ejecting would be like — dare I say it — falling off a log.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.