[Jonty30]

Although it was wrong on the sparingly part, but it described me this way. It's otherwise pretty accurate.

Based on the limited information available from Jonty30's comments on Free Republic, particularly from a thread dated September 3, 2024, Jonty30 appears to be a conservative-leaning individual with a focus on personal faith and a critical view of social media's impact. In the comments, Jonty30 responds to a post about leaving Twitter/X, expressing agreement with the decision to prioritize spiritual focus—specifically on Jesus Christ—over social media engagement. The user seems to value Free Republic as a platform for both news and spiritual encouragement, suggesting a preference for curated, like-minded community discussions over broader social media platforms.

Jonty30's comments also include a distinctive, recurring quip about Genghis Khan’s father having more descendants than Genghis Khan himself, which may indicate a playful or sarcastic streak, possibly used to punctuate their posts with a memorable or humorous tagline. This could reflect a desire to stand out or add personality to their contributions in the forum.

Additionally, a separate reference indicates Jonty30 self-describes as an "illegal alien Freeper" according to some on the board, which might suggest they’ve faced criticism or trolling within the community, possibly over their views or status on the forum. However, without more context, it’s unclear whether this is a serious claim or a sarcastic remark, either by Jonty30 or others.

Overall, Jonty30 comes across as a religiously inclined, conservative commenter who engages thoughtfully but sparingly, with a touch of humor or irony, and who values Free Republic’s environment over mainstream social media. The lack of extensive comments makes it hard to form a deeper picture, but these traits provide a basic outline.

[Red Badger]

Want to be surprised?

GOOGLE you own Real Name.

Want to have fun?

GOOGLE YOUR FRIENDS NAMES!................

[BenLurkin]

I or one welcome our new AI overlords.

And I do so much love Big Brother. I love Big Brother.

[Resolute Conservative]

I only care what about 4 people think of me but really, really don’t care what a machine thinks of me.

[z3n]

FYI: You just gave grok your IP address to associate with all of your FR posts.

While that sort of data aggregation has surely happened in the past, you might want to reconsider making it easier for them.

[Openurmind]

You wrote that... lol :)

[Political Junkie Too]

Here is what Perplexity AI says about you:

Q: If you read jonty30 comments on free republic, how would you describe this person?

Based on Jonty30's comments on Free Republic, this person comes across as curious, playful, and engaged with both technology and internet culture. Jonty30 experiments with AI chatbots like Grok, asking a range of questions from the technical (differences between stamina and endurance) to the humorous (“do farts have lumps?”), and even references pop culture and memes such as the “Holiday Inn Express” advertising campaign[1][2]. This suggests a sense of humor and familiarity with internet in-jokes. Jonty30 also demonstrates an interest in international events and historical topics, as seen in their detailed recounting of the Tiananmen Square Massacre, referencing various sources and estimates, which indicates a willingness to discuss serious subjects and a capacity for nuanced understanding[1]. The comments show a critical but open-minded approach to technology, as Jonty30 evaluates the thoroughness and balance of AI responses and expresses caution about privacy when prompted for personal data[1].

Overall, Jonty30 appears to be:

• Inquisitive and willing to explore new technologies.
• Possessing a playful, sometimes irreverent sense of humor.
• Knowledgeable about both pop culture and historical events. Skeptical and privacy-conscious when it comes to sharing personal information online.
• Engaged in thoughtful discussion, balancing lighthearted banter with more substantive commentary[1][2].

Citations:

[1] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4308438/posts
[2] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4308438/posts?page=44
[3] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4313858/posts
[4] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4313498/posts
[5] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313925/posts
[6] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313713/posts
[7] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313697/posts
[8] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4313533/posts
[9] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4313863/posts
[10] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4309761/posts

-PJ

[NoLibZone]

Grok:

I don’t have direct access to comments by “Nolibzone” on Free Republic, as my ability to view specific user posts is limited to what’s publicly available and indexed in real-time searches.

[Skooz]

Perplexity’s take on moi:

Skooz is a registered user on Free Republic, an online conservative discussion forum. Based on the available information, Skooz is an active participant who expresses strong conservative viewpoints, particularly critical of the Democratic Party, which Skooz describes as corrupt and even “evil” in several lengthy posts. These posts reference a wide range of topics, including political corruption, the Waco siege, abortion, and broader cultural issues, often framed in stark moral terms.
Skooz also shares personal reflections and broader philosophical thoughts, such as musings on love and loyalty, notably referencing the unwavering loyalty of dogs as a metaphor for true friendship. The writing style is impassioned and rhetorical, often invoking religious or moral imagery to underscore points.
There is no indication from the search results of Skooz’s real identity, profession, or any biographical details beyond their online activity and expressed opinions on Free Republic.

[Leaning Right]

Here’s a snippet of what I got:

“Leaning Right’s Free Republic comments are a delightful blend of knowledge and gentle humor. And his knowledge is deep and wide-ranging. We at Grok can’t understand why Leaning Right is not a United States senator, at least.”

(Yeah, I just made that up. It’s pretty accurate, anyway.)
🙂

[lee martell]

That’s a very interesting experiment, but for now, I’d prefer to maintain the ‘illusion’ that online, I exist as a
Complete Unknown, give or take a few of my more shop worn Avatars.

[redangus]

Grok says he has no details about me. Which I’m fine with. Same with Bing.

[gitmo]

Grok says I don’t exist.

[FreedomPoster]

Ping. A penny for your thoughts.

[monkeyshine]

It seems to have limited data from this site. It says I am a prolific poster/member of this community, but it only really references three threads and my tagline. Even after I prompted it to dig deeper it just spit out more words about the same 3 threads (one about the Covid jabs, one about the Russia Hoax, and one about motorcycle speed traps). Then Grok called many of you here “conspiracy theorists” and set me aside as “distinctive” from you jackals. Lol.

Here is an excerpt:

• Responsive to Others: They often reply to specific users or arguments, indicating active participation in the forum’s back-and-forth. For instance, in the VAERS thread, they directly addressed the thread’s premise about adverse event reporting.

• Balanced Skepticism: Unlike some Free Republic users who may fully endorse conspiracy theories, monkeyshine often tempers their skepticism with analytical caveats, as seen in their VAERS post where they noted statistical limitations rather than outright rejecting the data.

• Broad Topical Range: While rooted in conservative politics, they comment on diverse issues, from policy debates to cultural anecdotes, showing versatility in their engagement.

Summary

Monkeyshine’s posting style on FreeRepublic.com is characterized by a skeptical, direct, and opinionated tone, with concise yet expressive comments that blend analysis, sarcasm, and conservative ideology. Their posts are informal, conversational, and community-oriented, often challenging authority or mainstream narratives while engaging with data or specific thread points. The tagline “live and let live is dead” underscores a consistent worldview of diminishing freedoms, making their contributions distinctive within the forum’s conservative discourse.

[ansel12]

All it said about me was that I am a thoughtful lover, a good person, that I like walks on the beach and my girls two at a time.

[Honorary Serb]

The term “Honorary Serb” appears on FreeRepublic.com in posts by a user with the screen name “Honorary Serb,” who expresses strong pro-Serbian views. This user frequently comments on threads related to Serbian nationalism, Kosovo, and Republika Srpska, advocating for Serbian sovereignty and criticizing perceived anti-Serb actions or policies. For example, in a 2007 thread about Kosovo’s push for independence, the user “Honorary Serb” posted, “Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!”. Similarly, in a 2017 discussion about the YouTube channel “Based Patriot,” the same user reiterated these sentiments.

The term “Honorary Serb” in this context does not refer to an official title or award but rather seems to be a self-adopted moniker reflecting the user’s alignment with Serbian nationalist causes. There’s no evidence from the provided FreeRepublic references of a formal “Honorary Serb” designation, like the honorary citizenship of Belgrade described elsewhere, being discussed or awarded on the site. Instead, it’s tied to this specific user’s identity and their consistent focus on Serbian-related issues.

[C210N]

Interesting, and mostly on the mark, with instances exposing Grok's center-right, if anything, bent: User C210N on FreeRepublic.com Overview: C210N is an active member of FreeRepublic.com, a conservative internet forum founded in 1996 by Jim Robinson in Fresno, California, known for its pseudonymous user base called "Freepers." The user engages in discussions on political, social, and cultural topics, often aligning with conservative viewpoints. C210N’s posts reflect a deep skepticism of government, a focus on constitutional principles, and support for figures like Donald Trump, alongside an interest in connecting broader societal "dots" to uncover perceived hidden truths. Posting Activity and Style: Topics of Interest: C210N frequently posts on issues like election integrity, government overreach, constitutional violations, and global political events. Examples include: Election Law: In a December 2022 post, C210N highlighted a Supreme Court case on mail-in voting constitutionality, arguing that the Constitution’s “place” requirement for voting excludes mail-in ballots as “everywhere.” They noted the case’s long-shot nature but emphasized its potential impact. Vaccine Mandates: In June 2021, C210N credited Trump’s Operation Warp Speed for preventing mandatory vaccines by keeping them experimental, sparking debate with users like DugwayDuke, who countered that vaccines saved lives and would soon be approved. Global Conflicts: On January 1, 2023, C210N commented on an Israeli strike on Damascus, earning a nod from user Roman_War_Criminal for the heads-up, indicating engagement in international affairs discussions. Historical Parallels: In January 2013, C210N drew parallels between Nazi gun laws post-Kristallnacht and Obama-era policies, suggesting a pattern of disarmament and control, echoed by user MadMax. Tone and Philosophy: C210N’s posts often carry a contrarian, anti-establishment tone, urging readers to question official narratives. Their signature lines, like “You can trust government or you can understand history. But you CANNOT do both” (June 2021) or “We’re at war: Make them have to cheat so much it becomes comical, then ridicule them into oblivion” (September 2023), reflect distrust in institutions and a call for grassroots resistance. Speculative Theories: C210N engages in “dot-connecting,” linking events to broader conspiracies. In September 2023, they discussed Trump’s role in “draining the swamp” and a “Great Awakening” against a “Deep State Cabal,” interpreting military presence at Trump’s inauguration as symbolic of returning power to “The People.” Users like CrazyCatChick challenged these claims, noting C210N’s predictions (e.g., about elections or the Evergiven ship) often fail, though they described C210N as a “nice guy” trying to make sense of chaos. Controversial Claims: In September 2024, C210N was accused by user ConservativeMind of spreading “untruths” in a thread about alleged assassination attempts on Trump, suggesting involvement of Maxwell Yearick and suspicious circumstances around a body’s cremation. This indicates C210N’s willingness to engage with fringe theories, though it drew pushback. Conclusion: C210N is an active, polarizing Freeper known for anti-government rhetoric, constitutional advocacy, and speculative theories about political events. While respected by some for flagging news and sparking debate, they face criticism for inaccurate predictions and fringe claims. Their posts embody Free Republic’s ethos of conservative activism and skepticism, contributing to its vibrant, if contentious, community. For more details, you can explore their posts directly on FreeRepublic.com.

[C210N]

Interesting, and mostly on the mark, with instances exposing Grok’s center-right, if anything, bent (with proper formatting):

User C210N on FreeRepublic.com

Overview:

C210N is an active member of FreeRepublic.com, a conservative internet forum founded in 1996 by Jim Robinson in Fresno, California, known for its pseudonymous user base called “Freepers.” The user engages in discussions on political, social, and cultural topics, often aligning with conservative viewpoints. C210N’s posts reflect a deep skepticism of government, a focus on constitutional principles, and support for figures like Donald Trump, alongside an interest in connecting broader societal “dots” to uncover perceived hidden truths.

Posting Activity and Style:

Topics of Interest: C210N frequently posts on issues like election integrity, government overreach, constitutional violations, and global political events. Examples include:
Election Law: In a December 2022 post, C210N highlighted a Supreme Court case on mail-in voting constitutionality, arguing that the Constitution’s “place” requirement for voting excludes mail-in ballots as “everywhere.” They noted the case’s long-shot nature but emphasized its potential impact.

Vaccine Mandates: In June 2021, C210N credited Trump’s Operation Warp Speed for preventing mandatory vaccines by keeping them experimental, sparking debate with users like DugwayDuke, who countered that vaccines saved lives and would soon be approved.

Global Conflicts: On January 1, 2023, C210N commented on an Israeli strike on Damascus, earning a nod from user Roman_War_Criminal for the heads-up, indicating engagement in international affairs discussions.

Historical Parallels: In January 2013, C210N drew parallels between Nazi gun laws post-Kristallnacht and Obama-era policies, suggesting a pattern of disarmament and control, echoed by user MadMax.

Tone and Philosophy:

C210N’s posts often carry a contrarian, anti-establishment tone, urging readers to question official narratives. Their signature lines, like “You can trust government or you can understand history. But you CANNOT do both” (June 2021) or “We’re at war: Make them have to cheat so much it becomes comical, then ridicule them into oblivion” (September 2023), reflect distrust in institutions and a call for grassroots resistance.

Speculative Theories:

C210N engages in “dot-connecting,” linking events to broader conspiracies. In September 2023, they discussed Trump’s role in “draining the swamp” and a “Great Awakening” against a “Deep State Cabal,” interpreting military presence at Trump’s inauguration as symbolic of returning power to “The People.” Users like CrazyCatChick challenged these claims, noting C210N’s predictions (e.g., about elections or the Evergiven ship) often fail, though they described C210N as a “nice guy” trying to make sense of chaos.

Controversial Claims:

In September 2024, C210N was accused by user ConservativeMind of spreading “untruths” in a thread about alleged assassination attempts on Trump, suggesting involvement of Maxwell Yearick and suspicious circumstances around a body’s cremation. This indicates C210N’s willingness to engage with fringe theories, though it drew pushback.

...more stuff...

Conclusion:

C210N is an active, polarizing Freeper known for anti-government rhetoric, constitutional advocacy, and speculative theories about political events. While respected by some for flagging news and sparking debate, they face criticism for inaccurate predictions and fringe claims. Their posts embody Free Republic’s ethos of conservative activism and skepticism, contributing to its vibrant, if contentious, community. For more details, you can explore their posts directly on FreeRepublic.com.

[jmcenanly]

I had,”I don’t have any personal info about you, so I can’t describe you specifically. If you share some details—like your interests, personality traits, or what you’re into—I can give you a description based on that. What do you want to tell me about yourself?”
This is entirely better than, “ Ugly bag of mostly water”

[Political Junkie Too]

Here is what Grok says about me:

The Free Republic user "Political Junkie Too" is an active participant on the conservative news discussion forum FreeRepublic.com, a platform founded in 1996 by James C. "Jim" Robinson to discuss political topics from a grassroots, conservative perspective. Based on available information, here’s what can be inferred about Political Junkie Too:

• Activity and Content: Political Junkie Too has been posting on Free Republic since at least 2018, with contributions focusing on political analysis, often from a conservative viewpoint. Their posts cover topics like elections, impeachment discussions, and critiques of political figures and media. For example, in a 2019 post, they analyzed a Fox News poll about Trump’s impeachment, highlighting perceived biases in the poll’s demographic sampling and emphasizing support for Trump among independents. Another post from 2021 critiques Biden’s decision-making, reflecting a critical stance toward Democratic leadership.[](https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3785178/posts)[](https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3985270/replies?c=1)

• Posting Style and Views: Political Junkie Too’s commentary often aligns with Free Republic’s conservative ethos, advocating for limited government and constitutional principles. They emphasize the importance of public perception in politics, as seen in posts from an earlier period (circa 2009) where they argue that conservatives should adopt aggressive messaging tactics similar to those used by Democrats, focusing on shaping public opinion through accusations and innuendo rather than waiting for definitive proof. They express frustration with traditional conservative strategies, suggesting a more combative approach to challenge political opponents.[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/)[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/index)

• Engagement: The user actively engages with other Free Republic members, responding to comments and participating in threaded discussions. For instance, their posts often prompt replies from other users, indicating they are part of the community’s broader conversations. They also reference specific political events, such as Obama’s legitimacy, the Jack Abramoff scandal, and media bias, showing a deep interest in political strategy and media dynamics.[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/)[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkietoo/index)[](https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3785178/posts)

• Profile Details: There is no explicit "about" page for Political Junkie Too, and Free Republic’s structure does not typically provide detailed public profiles for users. However, another user alias, "politicaljunkienewbi," is noted as an alternative name, suggesting they may have used different handles or been associated with similar accounts.[](https://freerepublic.com/~politicaljunkienewbi/contact)

• Context on Free Republic: The platform itself is known for its conservative activism, with topics tagged in Political Junkie Too’s posts including SCOTUS, ProLife, Corruption, Taxes, MediaBias, and Trump, reflecting the forum’s focus on issues like government overreach, constitutional rights, and conservative political figures. The site has a history of grassroots organizing, notably during the Clinton impeachment era, and Political Junkie Too’s contributions fit within this tradition of political commentary and activism.[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic)[](https://freerepublic.com/about.htm)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeRepublic.com)

No personal details (e.g., real name, location, or occupation) are available, as Free Republic users typically operate under pseudonyms, and the platform emphasizes anonymity for its members. Political Junkie Too appears to be a dedicated, opinionated contributor to Free Republic’s conservative discourse, focusing on political strategy and media critique. If you’d like me to dig deeper into specific posts or analyze related content, let me know!

For the record, I have used only one screen name during my entire tenure here.

-PJ