Posted on 04/29/2025 8:31:37 AM PDT by Jonty30
Just ask this question for fun.
If you read username comments on free republic, how would you describe them?
Well that is a positive assessment, where did the negative assessment go?
Did it give you an option? We know there are always two sides to every story... lol
That’s surprising. I thought Grok would have tried to crawl FR (to use old school S.E. lingo) to get some info for it’s response, but it appears that (if nothing more than the sake of speed) it relies only on what information it has already indexed.
Perplexity’s take on moi:
Skooz is a registered user on Free Republic, an online conservative discussion forum. Based on the available information, Skooz is an active participant who expresses strong conservative viewpoints, particularly critical of the Democratic Party, which Skooz describes as corrupt and even “evil” in several lengthy posts. These posts reference a wide range of topics, including political corruption, the Waco siege, abortion, and broader cultural issues, often framed in stark moral terms.
Skooz also shares personal reflections and broader philosophical thoughts, such as musings on love and loyalty, notably referencing the unwavering loyalty of dogs as a metaphor for true friendship. The writing style is impassioned and rhetorical, often invoking religious or moral imagery to underscore points.
There is no indication from the search results of Skooz’s real identity, profession, or any biographical details beyond their online activity and expressed opinions on Free Republic.
Here’s a snippet of what I got:
“Leaning Right’s Free Republic comments are a delightful blend of knowledge and gentle humor. And his knowledge is deep and wide-ranging. We at Grok can’t understand why Leaning Right is not a United States senator, at least.”
(Yeah, I just made that up. It’s pretty accurate, anyway.)
🙂
For the record, I am not this "Brian Buckley" person.
Q: If you read User:"Political Junkie Too" comments on site:freerepublic.com, how would you describe this person?
Based on the available search results, User "Political Junkie Too" on FreeRepublic.com appears to be a well-informed, articulate, and opinionated conservative commentator with a strong interest in U.S. politics, economics, and legal issues.
Key Characteristics:
Background and Reputation:
- Conservative Perspective: The user consistently expresses views aligned with the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement and supports Donald Trump, emphasizing policies like tariffs for economic security and criticizing Wall Street's focus on inflation and short-term gains[1][2].
- Analytical and Detailed: Comments often analyze political and economic strategies, referencing factors like interest rates, inflation, and the broader impact of manufacturing policies on American communities[1].
- Direct and Persuasive: The tone is direct, sometimes challenging other conservatives to consider the historical significance of their actions, such as urging House Republicans not to "stop MAGA"[2].
- Engaged and Knowledgeable: The user is active in live political discussions, such as election night threads, and brings a depth of knowledge to debates about U.S. policy and global strategy (e.g., the strategic value of Greenland)[3][4].
- Signature Style: Posts are often signed with "-PJ," indicating a recognizable and consistent presence within the Free Republic community[1][2][4].
While the search results do not explicitly confirm the real identity of "Political Junkie Too," there is a profile in Dartmouth Alumni Magazine of Brian Buckley, a conservative Republican and self-described "political junkie" who became active on Free Republic under the handle "Clarity." Buckley is described as an L.A. attorney with a reputation for explaining legal and constitutional matters to other users, serving as a "house lawyer" and providing educational commentary on complex issues[5]. While it is not confirmed that Buckley is "Political Junkie Too," both share a similar approach: correcting misinformation, valuing integrity, and engaging deeply with political discourse.
Summary Table
Attribute: Description
Political Leaning: Conservative, pro-MAGA
Communication Style: Analytical, direct, sometimes humorous
Areas of Focus: U.S. politics, economics, legal/constitutional issues
Community Role: Regular, recognizable contributor; sometimes persuasive or corrective
Reputation: Knowledgeable, respected for depth and clarity of commentaryIn summary, "Political Junkie Too" is best described as a committed, knowledgeable, and persuasive conservative voice on Free Republic, known for thoughtful analysis and a willingness to engage in substantive debate on political and economic issues[1][2][4].
Citations
- https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4303776/posts
- https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4309593/posts?q=1&%3Bpage=30
- https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4275976/posts?page=23
- https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4286002/posts?q=1&%3Bpage=21
- https://archive.dartmouthalumnimagazine.com/article/2000/11/1/political-junkie
-PJ
That’s a very interesting experiment, but for now, I’d prefer to maintain the ‘illusion’ that online, I exist as a
Complete Unknown, give or take a few of my more shop worn Avatars.
“That’s surprising. I thought Grok would have tried to crawl FR (to use old school S.E. lingo) to get some info for it’s response, but it appears that (if nothing more than the sake of speed) it relies only on what information it has already indexed.”
And that doesn’t raise red flags? How can folks be so blind as to how much is already collected and archived about them in this new Matrix?
It’s why I maintain a practice of never putting pictures of myself on Facebook or any social media. It may have aggregated the text information I put on there, but it doesn’t have any pictures of me.
“I promise that Grok wrote that, which is why I thought it would be fun if others did the same.”
Actually I think it is a genius experiment. I think some may not be happy with the results it gives though. I don’t need a third party confirming I am an A-hole. I already know...
OK, so I don’t do AI... Want to do mine for me and see if I am right about myself? lol
Q: If you read User:"JoesBucks" comments on site:freerepublic.com, how would you describe this person?
Based on the available comments and posts by User:"JoesBucks" on Free Republic, this person can be described as a strongly conservative, pro-Trump commentator who is highly critical of illegal immigration and skeptical of mainstream media narratives.
Key Characteristics:
- Conservative and Pro-Trump: JoesBucks frequently supports Donald Trump’s policies and rhetoric, often defending Trump’s actions, such as in discussions about immigration enforcement and media controversies[5].
- Hardline on Immigration: The user expresses a strict stance on illegal immigration, arguing that deportation should occur regardless of gang affiliation and criticizing any perceived leniency or administrative mistakes in immigration enforcement[5].
- Distrust of Media and Political Opponents: JoesBucks shows skepticism toward media reporting, suggesting that media and political adversaries manipulate facts or distract from core issues. The user accuses others of being "Never Trumpers" if they question Trump’s narrative[5].
- Direct and Blunt Communication Style: The language used is blunt and sometimes abrasive, using strong terms to describe those they disagree with (e.g., "These people are f%#^ing idiots")[5].
- Engaged in Site Culture: The user participates in ongoing site activities, donation drives, and community discussions, indicating a regular and invested presence on Free Republic[2][3].
Overall, JoesBucks is a vocal, uncompromising conservative voice, especially on immigration and support for Trump, with a confrontational style toward opposing viewpoints[5].
Citations:
[1] https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:joesbucks/index?tab=comments%3Bbrevity%3Dfull%3Boptions%3Dno-change
[2] https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:joesbucks/index?more=133024436
[3] https://freerepublic.com/~joesbucks/
[4] https://www.freerepublic.com
[5] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4311959/posts
[6] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4228724/replies?c=1&q=1&%3Bpage=21
[7] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4303309/posts
[8] https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4308859/posts
Clearly, this is an imperfect science. It looks like it's mixing up comments made by a user with comments made to the user.
-PJ
Well you can hide so you’re lucky.
If you have an uncommon name you can’t.
I’m the only person in the United States with my name.
Was any of it true?
Yes, I have one pic out there that my kids posted without my permission. It was pulled the next day but I am sure it was archived...
But here is what folks do not realize. There is a “hidden” database of all this. Every time you let someone scan your ID they just collected your full information and photo from State and federal Databases... Private parties should not have immediate access to this info. It is a huge security and privacy issue for us personally.
Based on the limited information available from Free Republic and the provided search results, Openurmind appears to be a conservative-leaning user who engages thoughtfully on the platform. The only specific detail about Openurmind comes from a profile snippet featuring a quote: “The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children,” attributed to Dietrich Bonhoeffer. This choice of quote suggests a focus on moral and societal values, possibly emphasizing long-term consequences of political or cultural decisions, which aligns with Free Republic’s conservative ethos.
Inferred Characteristics:
Conservative Perspective: Given Free Republic’s focus on topics like pro-life issues, Second Amendment rights, and criticism of government overreach, Openurmind likely participates in discussions reflecting these priorities, such as elections, media bias, or traditional values.
Reflective Tone: The Bonhoeffer quote implies a philosophical or principled approach, suggesting Openurmind may frame their comments around moral or ethical considerations rather than purely reactionary takes.
Community Engagement: As a registered “Freeper,” Openurmind is part of a pseudonymous community known for robust debate. They likely contribute to threads on news or activism, possibly via “ping lists” for topics like corruption or elections, though no specific posts are available to confirm this.
Limitations:
No direct comments from Openurmind are accessible in the provided data or recent Free Republic threads (e.g., from October 2024), limiting the ability to analyze their style or specific views.
Free Republic’s closed nature and lack of public comment archives make it hard to verify their activity beyond the profile quote.
Unlike users like nopardons, who have drawn external commentary, Openurmind lacks documented controversy or detailed references, suggesting a less polarizing presence.
Summary:
Openurmind seems to be a conservative Free Republic member who values moral and societal principles, as evidenced by their profile quote. They likely engage in discussions on political or cultural issues with a reflective tone, but without specific comments, their exact style or focus remains unclear. They appear less controversial than some Freepers, blending into the platform’s broader conservative discourse. For a deeper profile, access to their recent posts would be needed, but these are not publicly available.
If you have specific threads or comments by Openurmind, I could provide a more detailed analysis!
Add the city and state. You’ll be there. Address, age, etc.
Mostly, except it apparently linked me with a bunch of people who I don’t know simply because my relatives are all linked on Facebook. I don’t have a FB account..............
LOLOLOL!................
Same here... :)
Grok says he has no details about me. Which I’m fine with. Same with Bing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.