Posted on 04/29/2025 8:31:37 AM PDT by Jonty30
Just ask this question for fun.
If you read username comments on free republic, how would you describe them?
Grok says I don’t exist.
Ping. A penny for your thoughts.
The Laz enters the chat..
.
Okay Laz break it to Us
This Could be Epic.
.
Metmom please chime in too.
It seems to have limited data from this site. It says I am a prolific poster/member of this community, but it only really references three threads and my tagline. Even after I prompted it to dig deeper it just spit out more words about the same 3 threads (one about the Covid jabs, one about the Russia Hoax, and one about motorcycle speed traps). Then Grok called many of you here “conspiracy theorists” and set me aside as “distinctive” from you jackals. Lol.
Here is an excerpt:
• Responsive to Others: They often reply to specific users or arguments, indicating active participation in the forum’s back-and-forth. For instance, in the VAERS thread, they directly addressed the thread’s premise about adverse event reporting.
• Balanced Skepticism: Unlike some Free Republic users who may fully endorse conspiracy theories, monkeyshine often tempers their skepticism with analytical caveats, as seen in their VAERS post where they noted statistical limitations rather than outright rejecting the data.
• Broad Topical Range: While rooted in conservative politics, they comment on diverse issues, from policy debates to cultural anecdotes, showing versatility in their engagement.
Summary
Monkeyshine’s posting style on FreeRepublic.com is characterized by a skeptical, direct, and opinionated tone, with concise yet expressive comments that blend analysis, sarcasm, and conservative ideology. Their posts are informal, conversational, and community-oriented, often challenging authority or mainstream narratives while engaging with data or specific thread points. The tagline “live and let live is dead” underscores a consistent worldview of diminishing freedoms, making their contributions distinctive within the forum’s conservative discourse.
Thank you! Will be back with a more comprehensive reply in a bit, starting a batch of Chili...
I thought I had a fairly unique name until I Googled it and there are dozens of guys with my name!................
I thought you were a girl.
I ran into a similar problem. I can only get Grok to find 1 post of mine here despite trying a couple different ways.
“Based on the available comments from EnderWiggin1970 on FreeRepublic.com, specifically from a thread discussing “The Nihilism of the Ruling Class” on December 19, 2022, this user appears to be an engaged and opinionated conservative commenter. Their posts suggest a strong alignment with the conservative ideology prevalent on the site, expressing agreement with the article’s critique of modern governance and oligarchic tendencies in American democracy. The user’s tone is concise and supportive of the discussion, indicating they value intellectual arguments that challenge perceived political dysfunction.
EnderWiggin1970’s choice of username, referencing the protagonist from Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game, might imply an affinity for strategic thinking or complex problem-solving, though this is speculative. Their participation in a politically charged thread alongside other “Freepers” (Free Republic users) suggests they are comfortable in a community known for its right-wing, grassroots conservative activism. However, with only limited comments available (e.g., a brief endorsement of the article’s perspective), it’s difficult to draw a detailed picture of their personality or broader views without further context.
Overall, EnderWiggin1970 comes across as a thoughtful, conservative-leaning individual who actively participates in online discussions critiquing political systems, but the depth of their character remains unclear from the sparse data.”
That’s fine as far as it goes, but it really shouldn’t make sweeping conclusions if it only has one data point.
By the way (grammar/diction police ON) the term “fairly unique” is incorrect. Unique means “one of a kind”, which is a binary condition. One cannot be “fairly unique” anymore than one can be “fairly pregnant”.
Uh, no.......................
All it said about me was that I am a thoughtful lover, a good person, that I like walks on the beach and my girls two at a time.
The term “Honorary Serb” appears on FreeRepublic.com in posts by a user with the screen name “Honorary Serb,” who expresses strong pro-Serbian views. This user frequently comments on threads related to Serbian nationalism, Kosovo, and Republika Srpska, advocating for Serbian sovereignty and criticizing perceived anti-Serb actions or policies. For example, in a 2007 thread about Kosovo’s push for independence, the user “Honorary Serb” posted, “Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!”. Similarly, in a 2017 discussion about the YouTube channel “Based Patriot,” the same user reiterated these sentiments.
The term “Honorary Serb” in this context does not refer to an official title or award but rather seems to be a self-adopted moniker reflecting the user’s alignment with Serbian nationalist causes. There’s no evidence from the provided FreeRepublic references of a formal “Honorary Serb” designation, like the honorary citizenship of Belgrade described elsewhere, being discussed or awarded on the site. Instead, it’s tied to this specific user’s identity and their consistent focus on Serbian-related issues.
My name mostly appears in obituaries of deceased relatives. That’s about it. It’s not a common surname in the US. In a way, that’s good, and in a way, not so much.
I’m just glad my name isn’t ‘John Smith’..................
Interesting, and mostly on the mark, with instances exposing Grok’s center-right, if anything, bent (with proper formatting):
User C210N on FreeRepublic.com
Overview:
C210N is an active member of FreeRepublic.com, a conservative internet forum founded in 1996 by Jim Robinson in Fresno, California, known for its pseudonymous user base called “Freepers.” The user engages in discussions on political, social, and cultural topics, often aligning with conservative viewpoints. C210N’s posts reflect a deep skepticism of government, a focus on constitutional principles, and support for figures like Donald Trump, alongside an interest in connecting broader societal “dots” to uncover perceived hidden truths.
Posting Activity and Style:
Topics of Interest: C210N frequently posts on issues like election integrity, government overreach, constitutional violations, and global political events. Examples include:
Election Law: In a December 2022 post, C210N highlighted a Supreme Court case on mail-in voting constitutionality, arguing that the Constitution’s “place” requirement for voting excludes mail-in ballots as “everywhere.” They noted the case’s long-shot nature but emphasized its potential impact.
Vaccine Mandates: In June 2021, C210N credited Trump’s Operation Warp Speed for preventing mandatory vaccines by keeping them experimental, sparking debate with users like DugwayDuke, who countered that vaccines saved lives and would soon be approved.
Global Conflicts: On January 1, 2023, C210N commented on an Israeli strike on Damascus, earning a nod from user Roman_War_Criminal for the heads-up, indicating engagement in international affairs discussions.
Historical Parallels: In January 2013, C210N drew parallels between Nazi gun laws post-Kristallnacht and Obama-era policies, suggesting a pattern of disarmament and control, echoed by user MadMax.
Tone and Philosophy:
C210N’s posts often carry a contrarian, anti-establishment tone, urging readers to question official narratives. Their signature lines, like “You can trust government or you can understand history. But you CANNOT do both” (June 2021) or “We’re at war: Make them have to cheat so much it becomes comical, then ridicule them into oblivion” (September 2023), reflect distrust in institutions and a call for grassroots resistance.
Speculative Theories:
C210N engages in “dot-connecting,” linking events to broader conspiracies. In September 2023, they discussed Trump’s role in “draining the swamp” and a “Great Awakening” against a “Deep State Cabal,” interpreting military presence at Trump’s inauguration as symbolic of returning power to “The People.” Users like CrazyCatChick challenged these claims, noting C210N’s predictions (e.g., about elections or the Evergiven ship) often fail, though they described C210N as a “nice guy” trying to make sense of chaos.
Controversial Claims:
In September 2024, C210N was accused by user ConservativeMind of spreading “untruths” in a thread about alleged assassination attempts on Trump, suggesting involvement of Maxwell Yearick and suspicious circumstances around a body’s cremation. This indicates C210N’s willingness to engage with fringe theories, though it drew pushback.
...more stuff...
Conclusion:
C210N is an active, polarizing Freeper known for anti-government rhetoric, constitutional advocacy, and speculative theories about political events. While respected by some for flagging news and sparking debate, they face criticism for inaccurate predictions and fringe claims. Their posts embody Free Republic’s ethos of conservative activism and skepticism, contributing to its vibrant, if contentious, community. For more details, you can explore their posts directly on FreeRepublic.com.
That’s pretty much what I said about the covid jabs :-).
Which AI did you use? I used Grok per thread request. I guess I could run it through ChatGPT and Perplexity
I had,”I don’t have any personal info about you, so I can’t describe you specifically. If you share some details—like your interests, personality traits, or what you’re into—I can give you a description based on that. What do you want to tell me about yourself?”
This is entirely better than, “ Ugly bag of mostly water”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.